OBJECTIVE: To identify optimal first-line therapies based on the rate of virologic success (VS) and the preservation of future treatment options in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive subjects. DESIGN: Systematic overview of genotypic resistance mutations from clinical trials of combination ART. METHODS: Various sources were searched for studies in ART-naive subjects providing virologic response rates and genotypes from subjects with virologic failure. The International AIDS Society-USA genotypic resistance guidelines were used to calculate regimen resistance cost (RCreg) and number of active drug (AD) scores for each regimen and to rank the regimens. RESULTS: Intra- and interstudy comparisons showed higher VS rates for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) regimens (range: 51%-76%) and boosted protease inhibitor (boosted PI) regimens (range: 55%-79%). Boosted PI failures had the lowest RCreg (range: 0.12-0.21) and the highest AD (range: 19.80-20.18) scores. NNRTI failures had higher RCreg (range: 0.00-1.22) and lower AD (range: 16.83-21) scores. CONCLUSIONS: NNRTI and boosted PI regimens provide the highest rates of VS in treatment-naive HIV-infected persons. Treatment option scores were higher in subjects who failed boosted PI- containing regimens versus NNRTI-containing regimens, however.
OBJECTIVE: To identify optimal first-line therapies based on the rate of virologic success (VS) and the preservation of future treatment options in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive subjects. DESIGN: Systematic overview of genotypic resistance mutations from clinical trials of combination ART. METHODS: Various sources were searched for studies in ART-naive subjects providing virologic response rates and genotypes from subjects with virologic failure. The International AIDS Society-USA genotypic resistance guidelines were used to calculate regimen resistance cost (RCreg) and number of active drug (AD) scores for each regimen and to rank the regimens. RESULTS: Intra- and interstudy comparisons showed higher VS rates for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) regimens (range: 51%-76%) and boosted protease inhibitor (boosted PI) regimens (range: 55%-79%). Boosted PI failures had the lowest RCreg (range: 0.12-0.21) and the highest AD (range: 19.80-20.18) scores. NNRTI failures had higher RCreg (range: 0.00-1.22) and lower AD (range: 16.83-21) scores. CONCLUSIONS: NNRTI and boosted PI regimens provide the highest rates of VS in treatment-naive HIV-infectedpersons. Treatment option scores were higher in subjects who failed boosted PI- containing regimens versus NNRTI-containing regimens, however.
Authors: Mary Albrecht; A Lisa Mukherjee; Camlin Tierney; Gene D Morse; Carrie Dykes; Karin L Klingman; Lisa M Demeter Journal: HIV Clin Trials Date: 2011 Jul-Aug
Authors: Lisa B Hightow-Weidman; Karen Jones; Gregory Phillips; Amy Wohl; Thomas P Giordano Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Lisa B Hightow-Weidman; Justin C Smith; Erik Valera; Derrick D Matthews; Patrick Lyons Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Monica Gandhi; Leslie Z Benet; Peter Bacchetti; Ann Kalinowski; Kathryn Anastos; Alan R Wolfe; Mary Young; Mardge Cohen; Howard Minkoff; Stephen J Gange; Ruth M Greenblatt Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Ingrid T Katz; Roger Shapiro; Daner Li; Usha Govindarajulu; Bruce Thompson; D Heather Watts; Michael D Hughes; Ruth Tuomala Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron; Richard D Moore; Steven G Deeks Journal: AIDS Date: 2008-10-18 Impact factor: 4.177