BACKGROUND: Adherence to antiretroviral medications is critical to achieving HIV viral suppression. Studies have been limited to cross-sectional analyses using measures that reflect only the percentage of prescribed doses taken (percent adherence), however. The contribution of dose timing and other factors to achieving virologic suppression has received less scrutiny. METHODS: In a longitudinal study, we collected detailed adherence information using multiple tools along with demographic, clinical, social-behavioral, and virologic measures. Subjects were followed for 48 weeks. Percent adherence, dose-timing, genotypic sensitivity, and virologic outcomes were collected every 4 weeks. Repeated measures mixed effects models (RMMEMs) were used to model the relation between virologic outcomes and adherence as well as genotypic sensitivity and others. RESULTS: Of the 141 subjects, mean percent adherence was 73% with a downward trend. Viral load (VL) dropped significantly (P = 0.01) over time. RMMEMs revealed that higher genotypic sensitivity, higher percent adherence, lower baseline VL, longer inclusion in the study, earlier HIV stage, and smaller dose-timing error were significantly associated with lower VL. In multivariate modeling, a 0.50 increase in the genotypic sensitivity score, a 10% increase in adherence, and a decrease of 3 hours of dose-timing error were associated with a decrease in log10 HIV RNA at 48 weeks of 0.69, 0.54, and 0.48, respectively (P < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term viral suppression requires consistent and high percent adherence accompanied by optimal interdose intervals. Efforts to improve viral outcomes should address not only missed doses but excessive variation in dose timing and prevention of adherence decline over time. Preventing the development and transmission of resistant variants is also critically important.
BACKGROUND: Adherence to antiretroviral medications is critical to achieving HIV viral suppression. Studies have been limited to cross-sectional analyses using measures that reflect only the percentage of prescribed doses taken (percent adherence), however. The contribution of dose timing and other factors to achieving virologic suppression has received less scrutiny. METHODS: In a longitudinal study, we collected detailed adherence information using multiple tools along with demographic, clinical, social-behavioral, and virologic measures. Subjects were followed for 48 weeks. Percent adherence, dose-timing, genotypic sensitivity, and virologic outcomes were collected every 4 weeks. Repeated measures mixed effects models (RMMEMs) were used to model the relation between virologic outcomes and adherence as well as genotypic sensitivity and others. RESULTS: Of the 141 subjects, mean percent adherence was 73% with a downward trend. Viral load (VL) dropped significantly (P = 0.01) over time. RMMEMs revealed that higher genotypic sensitivity, higher percent adherence, lower baseline VL, longer inclusion in the study, earlier HIV stage, and smaller dose-timing error were significantly associated with lower VL. In multivariate modeling, a 0.50 increase in the genotypic sensitivity score, a 10% increase in adherence, and a decrease of 3 hours of dose-timing error were associated with a decrease in log10 HIV RNA at 48 weeks of 0.69, 0.54, and 0.48, respectively (P < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term viral suppression requires consistent and high percent adherence accompanied by optimal interdose intervals. Efforts to improve viral outcomes should address not only missed doses but excessive variation in dose timing and prevention of adherence decline over time. Preventing the development and transmission of resistant variants is also critically important.
Authors: Susannah M Allison; Linda J Koenig; Stephanie L Marhefka; Rosalind J Carter; Elaine J Abrams; Marc Bulterys; Vicki Tepper; Paul E Palumbo; Pamela J Bachanas; John J Farley Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: Andrea Sankar; Carol Golin; Jane M Simoni; Mark Luborsky; Cynthia Pearson Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Duncan Smith-Rohrberg Maru; R Douglas Bruce; Mary Walton; Jo Anne Mezger; Sandra A Springer; David Shield; Frederick L Altice Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2007-12-18
Authors: Brent A Moore; Marc I Rosen; Yan Wang; Jie Shen; Karen Ablondi; Anna Sullivan; Mario Guerrero; Lisa Siqueiros; Eric S Daar; Honghu Liu Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2015-06
Authors: Conall O'Cleirigh; Sarah E Valentine; Megan Pinkston; Debra Herman; C Andres Bedoya; Janna R Gordon; Steven A Safren Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2015-01
Authors: Laura M Bogart; Matt G Mutchler; Bryce McDavitt; David J Klein; William E Cunningham; Kathy J Goggin; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Nikki Rachal; Kelsey A Nogg; Glenn J Wagner Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2017-12
Authors: Steven A Safren; Conall O'Cleirigh; Judy Y Tan; Sudha R Raminani; Laura C Reilly; Michael W Otto; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Richard T Lester; Edward J Mills; Antony Kariri; Paul Ritvo; Michael Chung; William Jack; James Habyarimana; Sarah Karanja; Samson Barasa; Rosemary Nguti; Benson Estambale; Elizabeth Ngugi; T Blake Ball; Lehana Thabane; Joshua Kimani; Lawrence Gelmon; Marta Ackers; Francis A Plummer Journal: Trials Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 2.279