Literature DB >> 16540129

Semi-empirical power-law scaling of new infection rate to model epidemic dynamics with inhomogeneous mixing.

Phillip D Stroud1, Stephen J Sydoriak, Jane M Riese, James P Smith, Susan M Mniszewski, Phillip R Romero.   

Abstract

The expected number of new infections per day per infectious person during an epidemic has been found to exhibit power-law scaling with respect to the susceptible fraction of the population. This is in contrast to the linear scaling assumed in traditional epidemiologic modeling. Based on simulated epidemic dynamics in synthetic populations representing Los Angeles, Chicago, and Portland, we find city-dependent scaling exponents in the range of 1.7-2.06. This scaling arises from variations in the strength, duration, and number of contacts per person. Implementation of power-law scaling of the new infection rate is quite simple for SIR, SEIR, and histogram-based epidemic models. Treatment of the effects of the social contact structure through this power-law formulation leads to significantly lower predictions of final epidemic size than the traditional linear formulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16540129     DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Math Biosci        ISSN: 0025-5564            Impact factor:   2.144


  14 in total

1.  When individual behaviour matters: homogeneous and network models in epidemiology.

Authors:  Shweta Bansal; Bryan T Grenfell; Lauren Ancel Meyers
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Do fatal infectious diseases eradicate host species?

Authors:  Alex P Farrell; James P Collins; Amy L Greer; Horst R Thieme
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  On the spread of epidemics in a closed heterogeneous population.

Authors:  Artem S Novozhilov
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Mathematical models of contact patterns between age groups for predicting the spread of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Sara Y Del Valle; J M Hyman; Nakul Chitnis
Journal:  Math Biosci Eng       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.080

5.  Comparing large-scale computational approaches to epidemic modeling: agent-based versus structured metapopulation models.

Authors:  Marco Ajelli; Bruno Gonçalves; Duygu Balcan; Vittoria Colizza; Hao Hu; José J Ramasco; Stefano Merler; Alessandro Vespignani
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.090

6.  Forecasting the 2013-2014 influenza season using Wikipedia.

Authors:  Kyle S Hickmann; Geoffrey Fairchild; Reid Priedhorsky; Nicholas Generous; James M Hyman; Alina Deshpande; Sara Y Del Valle
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Modeling Heterogeneity in Direct Infectious Disease Transmission in a Compartmental Model.

Authors:  Lingcai Kong; Jinfeng Wang; Weiguo Han; Zhidong Cao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Web-based infectious disease surveillance systems and public health perspectives: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jihye Choi; Youngtae Cho; Eunyoung Shim; Hyekyung Woo
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Modelling community-control strategies to protect hospital resources during an influenza pandemic in Ottawa, Canada.

Authors:  Patrick Saunders-Hastings; Bryson Quinn Hayes; Robert Smith; Daniel Krewski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal aggregation impacts on epidemiological simulations employing microcontact data.

Authors:  Mohammad Hashemian; Weicheng Qian; Kevin G Stanley; Nathaniel D Osgood
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.