Literature DB >> 16539553

Porcelain surface roughness, color and gloss changes after orthodontic bonding.

Jacob Jarvis1, Spiros Zinelis, Theodore Eliades, Thomas Gerard Bradley.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the alteration in surface characteristics after orthodontic debonding of two types of porcelain systems commonly used in prosthetic dentistry. For this purpose, porcelain specimens were fabricated from low-fusing (n = 20) and high-fusing (n = 20) porcelain. The baseline surface roughness, color, and gloss were evaluated using profilometry, color shade index, and gloss study. All specimens were bonded with brackets and debonded using a testing machine at a rate of 0.1 mm/minute crosshead speed. The porcelain surfaces were polished using a 12-fluted carbide composite removal bur (low-fusing, n = 20; high-fusing, n = 20). In addition, half of each porcelain group was further polished using a series of Sof-Lex discs (low-fusing, n = 10; high-fusing, n = 10). The postdebond porcelain surface characteristics roughness, color, and gloss were reevaluated and compared with baseline measurements. The results were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons test, with porcelain type (low-fusing or high-fusing) and polishing protocol (carbide bur or carbide bur and discs) serving as discriminate variables at alpha = 0.05 level of significance. Bonding and debonding increased all roughness parameters tested; however, no change was revealed between the two polishing protocols. Similarly, gloss and color index changes were significantly altered after resin grinding, regardless of the polishing method used. No difference was identified between the two porcelain types with respect to roughness, color index, or gloss. Orthodontic bonding alters the porcelain surfaces, and postdebond polishing does not restore the surface to the prebond state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16539553     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0274:PSRCAG]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the effect of four surface conditioning methods on the shear bond strength of metal bracket to porcelain surface.

Authors:  Hooman Zarif Najafi; Morteza Oshagh; Sepideh Torkan; Bahareh Yousefipour; Raha Salehi
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  CO2 laser conditioning of porcelain surfaces for bonding metal orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Farzin Heravi; Mohsen Hosseini
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gursimrit K Grewal Bach; Ysidora Torrealba; Manuel O Lagravère
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Porcelain color alteration after orthodontic bonding using three different surface preparation methods.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Moradinezhad; Mina Moradi; Milad Shamohammadi; Elham Hormozi; Amir Ghorani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 May-Jun

5.  Porcelain surface alterations and refinishing after use of two orthodontic bonding methods.

Authors:  Drew T Herion; Jack L Ferracane; David A Covell
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  The effect of remin pro and MI paste plus on bleached enamel surface roughness.

Authors:  Mohammad Sadegh Ahmad Akhoundi; Farzaneh Aghajani; Javad Chalipa; Amir Hooman Sadrhaghighi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-03-31

7.  Effect of two different finishing systems on surface roughness of feldspathic and fluorapatite porcelains in ceramo-metal restorations: Comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Cherry Anmol; Sumeet Soni
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.