Literature DB >> 16539383

In silico human and rat Vss quantitative structure-activity relationship models.

M Paul Gleeson1, Nigel J Waters, Stuart W Paine, Andrew M Davis.   

Abstract

We present herein a QSAR tool enabling an entirely in silico prediction of human and rat steady-state volume of distribution (Vss), to be made prior to chemical synthesis, preceding detailed allometric or mechanistic assessment of Vss. Three different statistical methodologies, Bayesian neural networks (BNN), classification and regression trees (CART), and partial least squares (PLS) were employed to model human (N=199) and rat (N=2086) data sets. The results in prediction of an independent test set show the human model has an r2 of 0.60 and an rms error in prediction of 0.48. The corresponding rat model has an r2 of 0.53 and an rms error in prediction of 0.37, indicating both models could be very useful in the early stages of the drug discovery process. This is the first reported entirely in silico approach to the prediction of rat and human steady-state volume of distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16539383     DOI: 10.1021/jm0510070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  6 in total

1.  Generation of in-silico cytochrome P450 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 inhibition QSAR models.

Authors:  M Paul Gleeson; Andrew M Davis; Kamaldeep K Chohan; Stuart W Paine; Scott Boyer; Claire L Gavaghan; Catrin Hasselgren Arnby; Cecilia Kankkonen; Nan Albertson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Modeling kinetics of subcellular disposition of chemicals.

Authors:  Stefan Balaz
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Data Sets Representative of the Structures and Experimental Properties of FDA-Approved Drugs.

Authors:  Dominique Douguet
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 4.  The significance of acid/base properties in drug discovery.

Authors:  David T Manallack; Richard J Prankerd; Elizabeth Yuriev; Tudor I Oprea; David K Chalmers
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 54.564

5.  Designing safer oral drugs.

Authors:  M C Wenlock
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.597

6.  Applying linear and non-linear methods for parallel prediction of volume of distribution and fraction of unbound drug.

Authors:  Eva M del Amo; Leo Ghemtio; Henri Xhaard; Marjo Yliperttula; Arto Urtti; Heidi Kidron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.