Literature DB >> 16538430

Impaired myocardial SPECT imaging secondary to silicon- and saline-containing breast implants.

Curtiss T Stinis1, Paul E Lizotte, Mohammad-Reza Movahed.   

Abstract

Early detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in women has been challenging. Women are more likely to present with atypical symptoms, and non-invasive evaluation for CAD has been less accurate. Myocardial SPECT imaging is a well-established technique that provides important physiologic, anatomic, and prognostic information in women. Attenuation artifacts secondary to breast tissue are a common problem in women and can lead to decreased specificity of gated SPECT imaging. Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a foreign object overlying the anterior wall of the heart in addition to native breast tissue can significantly increase attenuation artifacts. There is only one report to date describing attenuation artifact due to silicon breast implants in comparison to control, and there are no reports regarding saline breast implants. Here we report three cases of impaired myocardial SPECT imaging in women with breast implants: one patient with silicone implants, and two with saline-containing implants. Clinicians should be aware of this problem and women should be educated regarding the potential future diagnostic problems that may occur with breast implants before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16538430     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-005-9068-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  12 in total

Review 1.  Breast implants and breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Stacy M Smalley
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Breast attenuation artifacts in Tl-201 scintigraphy.

Authors:  E H Botvinick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Appearance of breast attenuation artifacts with thallium myocardial SPECT imaging.

Authors:  P R Garver; R D Wasnich; A M Shibuya; F Yeh
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.794

4.  The prevalence of women with breast implants in the United States--1989.

Authors:  R R Cook; R R Delongchamp; M Woodbury; L L Perkins; M C Harrison
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Cardiac imaging impaired by a silicone breast implant.

Authors:  Trip J Meine; Manesh R Patel; John Heitner; Terry A Fortin; Robert A Pagnanelli; Thomas R Gehrig; Raymond Kim; Salvador Borges-Neto
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.794

6.  Effect of silicone breast implants on myocardial imaging.

Authors:  B Caner; F Ozgur; D Bor; N Ulutuncel; M Aydin; O Sari
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  A reverse perfusion pattern during Technetium-99m stress myocardial perfusion imaging does not predict flow limiting coronary artery disease.

Authors:  E J Smith; A Hussain; M Manoharan; H J Testa; N P Curzen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  High prevalence of (99m)tc-tetrofosmin reverse perfusion pattern in patients with myocardial infarction and angiographically smooth coronary arteries.

Authors:  Gabriele Fragasso; Sergio L Chierchia; Flaviano Dosio; Enrico Rossetti; Luigi Gianolli; Maria Picchio; Alberto Margonato; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Noninvasive diagnostic test choices for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in women: a multivariate comparison of cardiac fluoroscopy, exercise electrocardiography and exercise thallium myocardial perfusion scintigraphy.

Authors:  J Hung; B R Chaitman; J Lam; J Lesperance; G Dupras; P Fines; M G Bourassa
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Breast implants following mastectomy in women with early-stage breast cancer: prevalence and impact on survival.

Authors:  Gem M Le; Cynthia D O'Malley; Sally L Glaser; Charles F Lynch; Janet L Stanford; Theresa Hm Keegan; Dee W West
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gated myocardial SPECT imaging; true additional value in AMI?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; A J Scholte; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  CT perfusion angiography; beware of artifacts!

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J J Bax; J W Jukema; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 2.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.