Literature DB >> 16538235

Fine organic particulate matter dominates indoor-generated PM2.5 in RIOPA homes.

Andrea Polidori1, Barbara Turpin, Qing Yu Meng, Jong Hoon Lee, Clifford Weisel, Maria Morandi, Steven Colome, Thomas Stock, Arthur Winer, Jim Zhang, Jaymin Kwon, Shahnaz Alimokhtari, Derek Shendell, Jennifer Jones, Corice Farrar, Silvia Maberti.   

Abstract

Residential indoor and outdoor fine particle (PM(2.5)) organic (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) concentrations (48 h) were measured at 173 homes in Houston, TX, Los Angeles County, CA, and Elizabeth, NJ as part of the Relationship of Indoor, Outdoor and Personal Air (RIOPA) study. The adsorption of organic vapors on the quartz fiber sampling filter (a positive artifact) was substantial indoors and out, accounting for 36% and 37% of measured OC at the median indoor (8.2 microg C/m(3)) and outdoor (5.0 microg C/m(3)) OC concentrations, respectively. Uncorrected, adsorption artifacts would lead to substantial overestimation of particulate OC both indoors and outdoors. After artifact correction, the mean particulate organic matter (OM=1.4 OC) concentration indoors (9.8 microg/m(3)) was twice the mean outdoor concentration (4.9 microg/m(3)). The mean EC concentration was 1.1 microg/m(3) both indoors and outdoors. OM accounted for 29%, 30% and 29% of PM(2.5) mass outdoors and 48%, 55% and 61% of indoor PM(2.5) mass in Los Angeles Co., Elizabeth and Houston study homes, respectively. Indirect evidence provided by species mass balance results suggests that PM(2.5) nitrate (not measured) was largely lost during outdoor-to-indoor transport, as reported by Lunden et al. This results in dramatic changes with outdoor-to-indoor transport in the mass and composition of ambient-generated PM(2.5) at California homes. On average, 71% to 76% of indoor OM was emitted or formed indoors, calculated by (1) Random Component Superposition (RCS) model and (2) non-linear fit of OC and air exchange rate data to the mass balance model. Assuming that all particles penetrate indoors (P=1) and there is no particle loss indoors (k=0), a lower bound estimate of 41% of indoor OM was indoor-generated (mean). OM appears to be the predominant species in indoor-generated PM(2.5), based on species mass balance results. Particulate OM emitted or formed indoors is substantial enough to alter the concentration, composition and behavior of indoor PM(2.5). One interesting effect of increased indoor OM concentrations is a shift in the gas-particle partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from the gas to the particle phase with outdoor-to-indoor transport.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16538235     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  13 in total

1.  Determinants of Indoor and Personal Exposure to PM(2.5) of Indoor and Outdoor Origin during the RIOPA Study.

Authors:  Qing Yu Meng; Dalia Spector; Steven Colome; Barbara Turpin
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  PM2.5 of ambient origin: estimates and exposure errors relevant to PM epidemiology.

Authors:  Qing Yu Meng; Barbara J Turpin; Andrea Polidori; Jong Hoon Lee; Clifford Weisel; Maria Morandi; Steven Colome; Thomas Stock; Arthur Winer; Jenfeng Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Sources of indoor air pollution in New York City residences of asthmatic children.

Authors:  Rima Habre; Brent Coull; Erin Moshier; James Godbold; Avi Grunin; Amit Nath; William Castro; Neil Schachter; Annette Rohr; Meyer Kattan; John Spengler; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Personal exposure to mixtures of volatile organic compounds: modeling and further analysis of the RIOPA data.

Authors:  Stuart Batterman; Feng-Chiao Su; Shi Li; Bhramar Mukherjee; Chunrong Jia
Journal:  Res Rep Health Eff Inst       Date:  2014-06

5.  Source proximity and meteorological effects on residential outdoor VOCs in urban areas: Results from the Houston and Los Angeles RIOPA studies.

Authors:  Jaymin Kwon; Clifford P Weisel; Maria T Morandi; Thomas H Stock
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Toward refined estimates of ambient PM2.5 exposure: Evaluation of a physical outdoor-to-indoor transport model.

Authors:  Natasha Hodas; Qingyu Meng; Melissa M Lunden; Barbara J Turpin
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Airborne Particulate Matter (PM2.0) Emitted During Floor Waxing: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jiaqi Zhou; Karsten Baumann; Naomi Chang; Glenn Morrison; Wanda Bodnar; Zhenfa Zhang; Joanna M Atkin; Jason D Surratt; Barbara J Turpin
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Source proximity and residential outdoor concentrations of PM(2.5), OC, EC, and PAHs.

Authors:  A Polidori; J Kwon; B J Turpin; C Weisel
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  Determinants of personal, indoor and outdoor VOC concentrations: an analysis of the RIOPA data.

Authors:  Feng-Chiao Su; Bhramar Mukherjee; Stuart Batterman
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Chemical characterization and source apportionment of indoor and outdoor fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) in retirement communities of the Los Angeles Basin.

Authors:  Sina Hasheminassab; Nancy Daher; Martin M Shafer; James J Schauer; Ralph J Delfino; Constantinos Sioutas
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.