Literature DB >> 16538116

Review in depth and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screening by faecal occult blood test.

Denis Heresbach1, Sylvain Manfredi, Pierre N D'halluin, Jean-François Bretagne, Bernard Branger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several randomized studies have shown that colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by faecal occult blood test (FOBT) reduces CRC mortality. These trials have different designs, especially concerning FOBT frequency and duration, as well as the length of follow-up after stopping FOBT campaigns. AIMS: To review the effectiveness of screening for CRC with FOBT, to consider the reduction in mortality during or after screening or to identify factors associated with a significant mortality reduction.
METHODS: A systematic review of trials of FOBT screening with a meta-analysis of four controlled trials selected for their biennial and population-based design. The main outcome measurements were mortality relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of biennial FOBT during short (10 years, i.e. five or six rounds) or long-term (six or more rounds) screening periods, as well as after stopping screening and follow-up during 5-7 years. The meta-analysis used the Mantel-Haenszel method with fixed effects when the heterogeneity test was not significant, and used 'intent to screen' results.
RESULTS: Although the quality of the four trials was high, only three were randomized, and one used rehydrated biennial FOBT associated with a high colonoscopy rate (28%). A meta-analysis of mortality results showed that subjects allocated to screening had a reduction of CRC mortality during a 10-year period (RR 0.86; CI 0.79-0.94) although CRC mortality was not decreased during the 5-7 years after the 10-year (six rounds) screening period, nor in the last phase (8-16 years after the onset of screening) of a long-term (16 years or nine rounds) biennial screening. Whatever the design of the period of ongoing FOBT, CRC incidence neither decreased nor increased, although it was reduced for 5-7 years after the 10-year screening period. Neither the design nor the clinical or demographic parameters of these trials were independently associated with CRC mortality reduction.
CONCLUSION: Biennial FOBT decreased CRC mortality by 14% when performed over 10 years, without evidence-based benefit on CRC mortality when performed over a longer period. No independent predictors of CRC mortality reduction have been identified in order to allow a CRC screening programme in any subgroups of subjects at risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16538116     DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200604000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  35 in total

Review 1.  Effect of verification bias on the sensitivity of fecal occult blood testing: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alan S Rosman; Mark A Korsten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist; Hongzhi Zou; Michael Domanico; Douglas W Mahoney; Tracy C Yab; William R Taylor; Malinda L Butz; Stephen N Thibodeau; Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Niels Chr Bjerregaard; Søren Laurberg; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Barry M Berger; Graham P Lidgard
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Fecal occult blood test and colorectal cancer: validation study with special reference to false-negative patients.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Kawada
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Using the Cancer Risk Management Model to evaluate colorectal cancer screening options for Canada.

Authors:  A J Coldman; N Phillips; J Brisson; W Flanagan; M Wolfson; C Nadeau; N Fitzgerald; A B Miller
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Patient perceptions of stool DNA testing for pan-digestive cancer screening: a survey questionnaire.

Authors:  Dennis Yang; Shauna L Hillman; Ann M Harris; Pamela S Sinicrope; Mary E Devens; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Margriet C de Haan; Esther M Stoop; Marije Deutekom; Paul Fockens; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Maarten Thomeer; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Monique E van Leerdam; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 7.  Do deficits in cardiac care influence high mortality rates in schizophrenia? A systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; Oliver Lord
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer: screening.

Authors:  Carmen Lynn Lewis
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2007-06-01

9.  Implementation of population screening for colorectal cancer by repeated fecal occult blood test in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Maaike J Denters; Marije Deutekom; Paul Fockens; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  M H Liedenbaum; A F van Rijn; A H de Vries; H M Dekker; M Thomeer; C J van Marrewijk; L Hol; M G W Dijkgraaf; P Fockens; P M M Bossuyt; E Dekker; J Stoker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.