Literature DB >> 16537713

Genetic variation in the nucleotide excision repair pathway and bladder cancer risk.

Montserrat García-Closas1, Núria Malats, Francisco X Real, Robert Welch, Manolis Kogevinas, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Ruth Pfeiffer, Debra Silverman, Mustafa Dosemeci, Adonina Tardón, Consol Serra, Alfredo Carrato, Reina García-Closas, Gemma Castaño-Vinyals, Stephen Chanock, Meredith Yeager, Nathaniel Rothman.   

Abstract

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is critical for protecting against damage from carcinogens in tobacco smoke. We evaluated the influence of common genetic variation in the NER pathway on bladder cancer risk by analyzing 22 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in seven NER genes (XPC, RAD23B, ERCC1, ERCC2, ERCC4, ERCC5, and ERCC6). Our study population included 1,150 patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder and 1,149 control subjects from Spain. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were adjusted for age, gender, region, and smoking status. Subjects with the variant genotypes for SNPs in four of the seven genes evaluated had small increases in bladder cancer risk compared to subjects with the homozygous wild-type genotypes: RAD23B IVS5-15A>G (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P = 0.01), ERCC2 R156R (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; P = 0.006), ERCC1 IVS5+33A>C (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5; P = 0.06; P(trend) = 0.04), and ERCC5 M254V (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-2.0; P = 0.04). A global test for pathway effects indicated that genetic variation in NER characterized by the 22 SNPs analyzed in this study significantly predicts bladder cancer risk (P = 0.04). Pairwise comparisons suggested that carrying variants in two genes could result in substantial increases in risk. Classification tree analyses suggested the presence of subgroups of individuals defined by smoking and NER genotypes that could have substantial increases in risk. In conclusion, these findings provide support for the influence of genetic variation in NER on bladder cancer risk. A detailed characterization of genetic variation in key NER genes is warranted and might ultimately help identify multiple susceptibility variants that could be responsible for substantial joint increases in risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16537713     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  68 in total

1.  Genetic variation in the base excision repair pathway and bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  Jonine D Figueroa; Núria Malats; Francisco X Real; Debra Silverman; Manolis Kogevinas; Stephen Chanock; Robert Welch; Mustafa Dosemeci; Adonina Tardón; Consol Serra; Alfredo Carrato; Reina García-Closas; Gemma Castaño-Vinyals; Nathaniel Rothman; Montserrat García-Closas
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  DNA repair polymorphisms modify bladder cancer risk: a multi-factor analytic strategy.

Authors:  Angeline S Andrew; Margaret R Karagas; Heather H Nelson; Simonetta Guarrera; Silvia Polidoro; Sara Gamberini; Carlotta Sacerdote; Jason H Moore; Karl T Kelsey; Eugene Demidenko; Paolo Vineis; Giuseppe Matullo
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 3.  Quantitative assessment of the association between XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  Chuan Liu; Qinghua Yin; Jianbing Hu; Jie Weng; Yajie Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-09-06

4.  Modulation of DNA damage/DNA repair capacity by XPC polymorphisms.

Authors:  Yimin Zhu; Hushan Yang; Qin Chen; Jie Lin; H Barton Grossman; Colin P Dinney; Xifeng Wu; Jian Gu
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-10-17

5.  Time course analysis of gene expression identifies multiple genes with differential expression in patients with in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Santhi K Ganesh; Jungnam Joo; Kimberly Skelding; Laxmi Mehta; Gang Zheng; Kathleen O'Neill; Eric M Billings; Anna Helgadottir; Karl Andersen; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Thorarinn Gudnason; Nancy L Geller; Robert D Simari; David R Holmes; William W O'Neill; Elizabeth G Nabel
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.063

6.  Genetic variation affects congenital heart defect susceptibility in offspring exposed to maternal tobacco use.

Authors:  Xinyu Tang; Charlotte A Hobbs; Mario A Cleves; Stephen W Erickson; Stewart L MacLeod; Sadia Malik
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-06-02

7.  Genetic polymorphisms in key DNA repair genes and risk of head and neck cancer in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Hua Yuan; Huizhang Li; Hongxia Ma; Yuming Niu; Yunong Wu; Shangyue Zhang; Zhibin Hu; Hongbing Shen; Ning Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Immunoscreening of the extracellular proteome of colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Susanne Klein-Scory; Salwa Kübler; Hanna Diehl; Christina Eilert-Micus; Anke Reinacher-Schick; Kai Stühler; Bettina Warscheid; Helmut E Meyer; Wolff Schmiegel; Irmgard Schwarte-Waldhoff
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Sample size requirements to detect the effect of a group of genetic variants in case-control studies.

Authors:  Ramal Moonesinghe; Quanhe Yang; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-03

10.  Evaluation of a candidate breast cancer associated SNP in ERCC4 as a risk modifier in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/BRCA2 (CIMBA).

Authors:  A Osorio; R L Milne; G Pita; P Peterlongo; T Heikkinen; J Simard; G Chenevix-Trench; A B Spurdle; J Beesley; X Chen; S Healey; S L Neuhausen; Y C Ding; F J Couch; X Wang; N Lindor; S Manoukian; M Barile; A Viel; L Tizzoni; C I Szabo; L Foretova; M Zikan; K Claes; M H Greene; P Mai; G Rennert; F Lejbkowicz; O Barnett-Griness; I L Andrulis; H Ozcelik; N Weerasooriya; A-M Gerdes; M Thomassen; D G Cruger; M A Caligo; E Friedman; B Kaufman; Y Laitman; S Cohen; T Kontorovich; R Gershoni-Baruch; E Dagan; H Jernström; M S Askmalm; B Arver; B Malmer; S M Domchek; K L Nathanson; J Brunet; T Ramón Y Cajal; D Yannoukakos; U Hamann; F B L Hogervorst; S Verhoef; E B Gómez García; J T Wijnen; A van den Ouweland; D F Easton; S Peock; M Cook; C T Oliver; D Frost; C Luccarini; D G Evans; F Lalloo; R Eeles; G Pichert; J Cook; S Hodgson; P J Morrison; F Douglas; A K Godwin; O M Sinilnikova; L Barjhoux; D Stoppa-Lyonnet; V Moncoutier; S Giraud; C Cassini; L Olivier-Faivre; F Révillion; J-P Peyrat; D Muller; J-P Fricker; H T Lynch; E M John; S Buys; M Daly; J L Hopper; M B Terry; A Miron; Y Yassin; D Goldgar; C F Singer; D Gschwantler-Kaulich; G Pfeiler; A-C Spiess; Thomas V O Hansen; O T Johannsson; T Kirchhoff; K Offit; K Kosarin; M Piedmonte; G C Rodriguez; K Wakeley; J F Boggess; J Basil; P E Schwartz; S V Blank; A E Toland; M Montagna; C Casella; E N Imyanitov; A Allavena; R K Schmutzler; B Versmold; C Engel; A Meindl; N Ditsch; N Arnold; D Niederacher; H Deissler; B Fiebig; R Varon-Mateeva; D Schaefer; U G Froster; T Caldes; M de la Hoya; L McGuffog; A C Antoniou; H Nevanlinna; P Radice; J Benítez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.