Literature DB >> 16537709

Genetic mechanisms of TP53 loss of heterozygosity in Barrett's esophagus: implications for biomarker validation.

V Jon Wongsurawat1, Jennifer C Finley, Patricia C Galipeau, Carissa A Sanchez, Carlo C Maley, Xiaohong Li, Patricia L Blount, Robert D Odze, Peter S Rabinovitch, Brian J Reid.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: 17p (TP53) loss of heterozygosity (LOH) has been reported to be predictive of progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma, but the mechanism by which TP53 LOH develops is unknown. It could be (a) DNA deletion, (b) LOH without copy number change, or (c) tetraploidy followed by genetic loss. If an alternative biomarker assay, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), provided equivalent results, then translation to the clinic might be accelerated, because LOH genotyping is presently limited to research centers.
METHODS: We evaluated mechanisms of TP53 LOH to determine if FISH and TP53 LOH provided equivalent results on the same flow-sorted samples (n = 43) representing established stages of clonal progression (diploid, diploid with TP53 LOH, aneuploid) in 19 esophagectomy specimens.
RESULTS: LOH developed by all three mechanisms: 32% had DNA deletions, 32% had no copy number change, and 37% had FISH patterns consistent with a tetraploid intermediate followed by genetic loss. Thus, FISH and LOH are not equivalent (P < 0.000001).
CONCLUSIONS: LOH develops by multiple chromosome mechanisms in Barrett's esophagus, all of which can be detected by genotyping. FISH cannot detect LOH without copy number change, and dual-probe FISH is required to detect the complex genetic changes associated with a tetraploid intermediate. Alternative biomarker assay development should be guided by appreciation and evaluation of the biological mechanisms generating the biomarker abnormality to detect potential sources of discordance. FISH will require validation in adequately powered longitudinal studies before implementation as a clinical diagnostic for esophageal adenocarcinoma risk prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16537709     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  17 in total

1.  Medical and endoscopic management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  K K Wang; J M Tian; E Gorospe; J Penfield; G Prasad; T Goddard; M Wongkeesong; N S Buttar; L Lutzke; S Krishnadath
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 2.  Early events during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

3.  Utility of biomarkers in prediction of response to ablative therapy in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Ganapathy A Prasad; Kenneth K Wang; Kevin C Halling; Navtej S Buttar; Louis-Michel Wongkeesong; Alan R Zinsmeister; Shannon M Brankley; Emily G Barr Fritcher; Wytske M Westra; Kausilia K Krishnadath; Lori S Lutzke; Lynn S Borkenhagen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler; Prateek Sharma; Rhonda F Souza; John M Inadomi; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Benefit of baseline cytometry for surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Nicole Vogt; René Schönegg; Jürgen M Gschossmann; Jan Borovicka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Derivation of genetic biomarkers for cancer risk stratification in Barrett's oesophagus: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Margriet R Timmer; Pierre Martinez; Chiu T Lau; Wytske M Westra; Silvia Calpe; Agnieszka M Rygiel; Wilda D Rosmolen; Sybren L Meijer; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Rosalie C Mallant-Hent; Anton H J Naber; Arnoud H A M van Oijen; Lubbertus C Baak; Pieter Scholten; Clarisse J M Böhmer; Paul Fockens; Carlo C Maley; Trevor A Graham; Jacques J G H M Bergman; Kausilia K Krishnadath
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Biomarkers in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Rhonda F Souza
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-04

8.  Cell proliferation, cell cycle abnormalities, and cancer outcome in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a long-term prospective study.

Authors:  Dennis L Chao; Carissa A Sanchez; Patricia C Galipeau; Patricia L Blount; Thomas G Paulson; David S Cowan; Kamran Ayub; Robert D Odze; Peter S Rabinovitch; Brian J Reid
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  The molecular basis of carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Rhonda F Souza
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Single nucleotide polymorphism-based genome-wide chromosome copy change, loss of heterozygosity, and aneuploidy in Barrett's esophagus neoplastic progression.

Authors:  Xiaohong Li; Patricia C Galipeau; Carissa A Sanchez; Patricia L Blount; Carlo C Maley; Jessica Arnaudo; Daniel A Peiffer; Dmitry Pokholok; Kevin L Gunderson; Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.