OBJECTIVE: Measurement of urinary free tetrahydrocortisol and tetrahydrocortisone ratio (allo-THF+THF)/THE is clinically important in the diagnosis of hypertension caused by congenital absence of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (apparent mineralocorticoid excess, AME) or inhibition of the enzyme after licorice ingestion. Although gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) provides reliable results, it requires derivatization and is lengthy and time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that detection by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is a potentially superior method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis utilizes 1 mL urine. The samples were extracted with solid-phase extraction (SPE) using ethyl acetate as eluent. The extract was evaporated to dryness, and allo-tetrahydrocortisol (allo-THF), THF and THE concentrations were analyzed by LC-MS/MS operating in the negative mode after separation on a reversed-phase column. The calibration curves exhibited consistent linearity and reproducibility in the range of 7.5-120 nmol/L. Interassay CVs were 7.0-10 % at mean ratios of (allo-THF+THF)/THE of 0.54-1.9. The detection limit of the analytes was 0.4-0.8 nmol/L (signal-to-noise ratio = 3). The mean recovery of the three analytes ranged from 88 to 95 %. The regression equation for the free ratio using the LC-MS/MS (x) method and the total ratio using the GC-MS (y) method was: y = 0.30x+0.91 (r = 0.61; n = 25). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of the LC-MS/MS method offer an advantage over GC-MS by eliminating derivatization. The high costs of equipment are balanced by higher through-put, owing also to shorter chromatographic run times.
OBJECTIVE: Measurement of urinary free tetrahydrocortisol and tetrahydrocortisone ratio (allo-THF+THF)/THE is clinically important in the diagnosis of hypertension caused by congenital absence of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (apparent mineralocorticoid excess, AME) or inhibition of the enzyme after licorice ingestion. Although gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) provides reliable results, it requires derivatization and is lengthy and time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that detection by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is a potentially superior method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis utilizes 1 mL urine. The samples were extracted with solid-phase extraction (SPE) using ethyl acetate as eluent. The extract was evaporated to dryness, and allo-tetrahydrocortisol (allo-THF), THF and THE concentrations were analyzed by LC-MS/MS operating in the negative mode after separation on a reversed-phase column. The calibration curves exhibited consistent linearity and reproducibility in the range of 7.5-120 nmol/L. Interassay CVs were 7.0-10 % at mean ratios of (allo-THF+THF)/THE of 0.54-1.9. The detection limit of the analytes was 0.4-0.8 nmol/L (signal-to-noise ratio = 3). The mean recovery of the three analytes ranged from 88 to 95 %. The regression equation for the free ratio using the LC-MS/MS (x) method and the total ratio using the GC-MS (y) method was: y = 0.30x+0.91 (r = 0.61; n = 25). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity and specificity of the LC-MS/MS method offer an advantage over GC-MS by eliminating derivatization. The high costs of equipment are balanced by higher through-put, owing also to shorter chromatographic run times.
Authors: Fidel Allende; Sandra Solari; Carmen Campino; Cristian A Carvajal; Carlos F Lagos; Andrea Vecchiola; Carolina Valdivia; René Baudrand; Gareth I Owen; Carlos E Fardella Journal: Chromatographia Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 2.044
Authors: Carmen Campino; Cristian A Carvajal; Javiera Cornejo; Betty San Martín; Oliviero Olivieri; Giancesare Guidi; Giovanni Faccini; Francesco Pasini; Javiera Sateler; Rene Baudrand; Lorena Mosso; Gareth I Owen; Alexis M Kalergis; Oslando Padilla; Carlos E Fardella Journal: Endocrine Date: 2009-10-31 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Elina J Hautaniemi; Antti J Tikkakoski; Arttu Eräranta; Mika Kähönen; Esa Hämäläinen; Ursula Turpeinen; Heini Huhtala; Jukka Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 3.240