Literature DB >> 16536913

Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for serum creatinine and comparison with enzymatic and Jaffe methods.

Laura J Owen1, Joanne E Wear, Brian G Keevil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can be estimated using creatinine clearance or calculated formulae, methods which rely on creatinine quantification in serum. Creatinine is most frequently measured using the Jaffe method, but this is prone to interference by, for example, bilirubin, protein and ketones. Recent amendments to this assay have been made by manufacturers in an attempt to compensate for the protein interference.
METHODS: We developed a novel liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the analysis of creatinine in serum, using a strong cation exchange column to give a short run time of 1.5 min and minimal ion suppression. The method had a lower limit of quantification of 5 micromol/L and the intra- and inter-assay imprecision was <5% and <7%, respectively. Serum samples (n = 182) were subsequently analysed by enzymatic, compensated Jaffe and LC-MS/MS methods and results compared.
RESULTS: The compensated Jaffe and enzymatic methods gave similar results to the LC-MS/MS method at concentrations below 150 micromol/L. At concentrations above this value, creatinine was underestimated by both the compensated Jaffe and enzymatic methods compared with the LC-MS/MS method.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a novel, simple, sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for use in comparative studies or when the results of either Jaffe or enzymatic assays are in question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16536913     DOI: 10.1258/000456306776021544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  6 in total

1.  Serum creatinine determined by Jaffe, enzymatic method, and isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in patients under hemodialysis.

Authors:  Wen-Sheng Liu; Yu-Ting Chung; Chih-Yu Yang; Chih-Ching Lin; Kun-Hung Tsai; Wu-Chang Yang; Tzen-Wen Chen; Yen-Ting Lai; Szu-Yuan Li; Tsung-Yun Liu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Measurement of serum creatinine--current status and future goals.

Authors:  Michael Peake; Malcolm Whiting
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-11

3.  Comparison of methods, storage conditions, and time to analysis of serum and urine creatinine measured from microsamples by liquid chromatography mass spectrometery (LC/MS) vs. Jaffe.

Authors:  David J Askenazi; John F Moore; Naomi Fineberg; Rajesh Koralkar; Stephanie Clevenger; Jon Daniel Sharer
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  LC-MS/MS Method for Serum Creatinine: Comparison with Enzymatic Method and Jaffe Method.

Authors:  Meixian Ou; Yunxiao Song; Shuijun Li; Gangyi Liu; Jingying Jia; Menqi Zhang; Haichen Zhang; Chen Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  GC-MS Studies on Derivatization of Creatinine and Creatine by BSTFA and Their Measurement in Human Urine.

Authors:  Olga Begou; Kathrin Weber; Bibiana Beckmann; Dimitrios Tsikas
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Analytical performance evaluation of different test systems on serum creatinine assay.

Authors:  Lina He; Jinqi Yu; Guang Han; Di Huang; Liqiao Han; Qiaoxuan Zhang; Yunxiu Wang; Zemin Wan; Xian-Zhang Huang; Yujuan Xiong; Xiaobin Wu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 2.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.