Literature DB >> 16536779

Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for treating primary varicocele in children.

Paola Zaupa1, Johannes Mayr, Michael E Höllwarth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of antegrade sclerotherapy (AS) for the treatment of primary varicocele in childhood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 1996 to December 2004, 88 patients (mean age 13.3 years, range 9-18) with primary varicocele underwent AS (91 varicocele ablations in all). The indications for surgery were testicular pain (16 boys, 18%), a large varicocele with cosmetic implications, testicular hypotrophy (one) and in 71 (81%) the varicocele was detected incidentally during a routine physical examination; all were left-sided. According to the classification used by Tauber, 46 (52%) varicoceles were grade II and 42 (48%) grade III. The clinical and ultrasonography (US) results were evaluated over a median (range) follow-up of 11 (3-60) months, and the operative duration, X-ray exposure time, persistence rate of varicoceles and complications were compared with those using other techniques.
RESULTS: In 11 patients there was a palpable difference in size between the testicles, but in only five (6%) was testicular hypotrophy (testicular volume (<75% testicular volume vs the normal side) confirmed by US. The mean (sem) operative duration for AS was 33.2 (2.14) min. In 16 (18%) patients it was necessary to expose a second or third vein because the first vein chosen was unsuitable for sclerotherapy. The mean operative radiation exposure was 2.18 (0.21) s. One patient (1%) was treated with a high ligature of the testicular vein (Palomo procedure) after initial unsuccessful AS, and was excluded from the analysis. Eighty-four (97%) patients were eligible for follow-up: six (7%) had a persistent varicocele (four grade II, two grade III), four of whom had repeat sclerotherapy successfully (no recurrence at follow-up). Fourteen (15%) patients had enlarged testicular veins only on US (varicocele grade 0). No patient developed a hydrocele after AS, There were complications after surgery in three (3%) patients (two superficial wound infections, one scrotal haematoma together with focal testicular necrosis).
CONCLUSIONS: AS is an efficient minimally invasive surgical method for correcting varicoceles in older children, although the operative duration is sometimes longer than in adults, and surgery can be more difficult because of the smaller veins. Partial testicular necrosis, despite correct AS, is a very rare but serious complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16536779     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06033.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

Review 1.  Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility.

Authors:  Natalya A Lopushnyan; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  Management of hydrocele in adolescent patients.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Marco Castagnetti; Enrico De Grazia
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Large bowel infarct following antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for varicocele: A case report.

Authors:  Patrizio Vicini; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Pietro Grande; Giuseppe Voria; Gabriele Antonini; Ferdinando De Marco; Stefano Di Nicola; Vincenzo Gentile
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  The hemodynamic approach to evaluating adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Marco Castagnetti; Ignazio Gattuccio; Marco Pensabene; Maria Sergio; Enrico De Grazia
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Scrotal antegradesclerotherapy demonstrates anatomical variations on venous drainage in paediatric, adolescent and young adult varicoceles.

Authors:  Y S Wong; K L Y Chung; K W Y Lo; C S W Liu; T W Fan; S K S Tse; P M Y Tang; N S Y Chao; K K W Liu; M W Y Leung
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Management options of varicoceles.

Authors:  Peter Chan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

Review 7.  The evolution and refinements of varicocele surgery.

Authors:  Joel L Marmar
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Adolescent varicocele: limited indications for treatment during puberty and adolescence.

Authors:  Guy A Bogaert
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-12

9.  Retroperitoneal Varix ligation with sclerotherapy: a prospective randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Yaser M Abdelsalam; Waleed M Saeed; Ahmed M Moeen; Ehab O Elganainy; Abdelfatah I Ahmed
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2017-08-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.