Literature DB >> 16536772

A vacuum device for penile elongation: fact or fiction?

Mohammad Kazem Aghamir1, Reza Hosseini, Farshid Alizadeh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a vacuum device as a noninvasive method for penile elongation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2003 and November 2004, 37 sexually active men with a stretched penis length of <10 cm were given vacuum treatment three times a week, for 20 min on each occasion, for 6 months.
RESULTS: After 6 months, the mean penile length had increased from 7.6 cm to 7.9 cm (no significant difference). The efficacy of vacuum treatment was approximately 10%, and the patient satisfaction rate was 30%. There was one case of haematoma of the penis and one of glans numbness, both resolved spontaneously without any intervention.
CONCLUSION: Vacuum treatment of the penis is not an effective method for penile elongation, but provides psychological satisfaction for some men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16536772     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05992.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic strategies for patients with micropenis or penile dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  Oliver Kayes; Majid Shabbir; David Ralph; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Necrotizing Epididymo-Orchitis: A Rare Manifestation of COVID-19.

Authors:  Ali Tavoosian; Sana Ahmadi; Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Penile traction therapy and Peyronie's disease: a state of art review of the current literature.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Gerald Brock
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-02

Review 4.  Multidisciplinary approach and management of patients who seek medical advice for penile size concerns: a narrative review.

Authors:  Nicolò Schifano; Omer Onur Cakir; Fabio Castiglione; Francesco Montorsi; Giulio Garaffa
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 5.  Male esthetic genital surgery: recommendations and gaps to be filled.

Authors:  Carlo Bettocchi; Andrea Alberto Checchia; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Anna Ricapito; Gian Maria Busetto; Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Carrieri
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Genital reconstruction in exstrophy patients.

Authors:  R B Nerli; S S Shirol; Ajay Guntaka; Shivagouda Patil; Murigendra B Hiremath
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.