Literature DB >> 16536771

Determining the success of vasectomy.

Nivedita Bhatta Dhar1, Amit Bhatt, J Stephen Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine patient compliance, significance of rare nonmotile sperm (RNMS) and to determine the timing and number of semen analyses required to confirm sterility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2001 to November 2004, 436 consecutive primary vasectomies were performed by one surgeon. All patients were instructed to submit two initial semen specimens for analysis (2 and 3 months after vasectomy) and additional samples (at 1-month intervals) if sperm were identified on the initial and subsequent analyses.
RESULTS: A quarter of the patients submitted no semen specimens and only 21% followed the full instructions to provide two consecutive negative semen analyses. Three-quarters of the patients provided a semen specimen at 8 weeks after vasectomy; of these, 75% were azoospermic and 25% contained sperm. At 12 weeks after vasectomy half the patients provided a semen specimen; of these, 91% were azoospermic and 9% contained sperm. Of the 83 patients with semen containing sperm at 8 weeks, 80 had RNMS and three had rare motile sperm (one of whom subsequently proved to have vasectomy failure). Of the 80 patients with RNMS, at 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 11 months, 65, four, three, four, two, one and one, respectively were azoospermic.
CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate that many patients are not compliant with the protocol after vasectomy. Provided patients have been adequately counselled, we think that one negative semen analysis at 3 months or one with RNMS at 2 months may be adequate to determine the success of vasectomy. This should reduce the number of semen analyses, including reducing the number of men who must undergo repeat testing, without sacrificing the accuracy of determining paternity. Simplifying the follow-up after vasectomy is important; not only would it be cost-effective but it may also improve patient compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16536771     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06107.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  Compact and light-weight automated semen analysis platform using lensfree on-chip microscopy.

Authors:  Ting-Wei Su; Anthony Erlinger; Derek Tseng; Aydogan Ozcan
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Vasectomy by epithelial curettage without suture or cautery: a pilot study in humans.

Authors:  John K Amory; John W Jessen; Charles Muller; Richard E Berger
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Impact of the 2012 American Urological Association vasectomy guidelines on post-vasectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Robert M Coward; Niraj G Badhiwala; Jason R Kovac; Ryan P Smith; Dolores J Lamb; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Do I need to see a urologist for my vasectomy? A comparison of practice patterns between urologists and family medicine physicians.

Authors:  Natasza M Posielski; Daniel D Shapiro; Xing Wang; Brian V Le
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  The clinical impact of British guidelines on post-vasectomy semen analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Beder; Sudhanshu Chitale
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2020-09-26

6.  Vasectomy: A simple snip?

Authors:  Nivedita Bhatta Dhar; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-01

7.  Scheduling Appointments for Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Has No Impact on Compliance.

Authors:  Frederik M Jacobsen; Christian Fuglesang S Jensen; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sønksen; Dana A Ohl
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-11-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.