Literature DB >> 16536194

Restorative treatment decision making with unaided visual examination, intraoral camera and operating microscope.

Hülya Erten1, Mine Betül Uçtasli, Zühre Zafersoy Akarslan, Ozgür Uzun, Mustafa Semiz.   

Abstract

This study assessed the restorative treatment options of the occlusal surfaces of teeth examined with unaided visual assistance, an intraoral camera and an operating microscope. Sixty-eight extracted human molars were mounted to perform mouth models with a premolar in contact on both sides. Four observers examined the models in a phantom head, which simulated clinical conditions, using three techniques: unaided visual examination, intraoral camera and operating microscope. The observers were asked to assess the occlusal surface of each tooth and make a treatment decision based on the following scale: 1) the occlusal surface being sound and "not needing a restoration," 2) the occlusal surface having a subsurface or enamel lesion. No operative treatment was needed at this visit, but special attention was given to this surface at recall visits: "preventive care-defer treatment" and 3) the surface had a carious lesion and "needed a restoration." The teeth were then sectioned in the mesio-distal direction and examined under a stereomicroscope with 10x magnification to determine the true extent of caries. Statistical analysis was conducted by calculating percentages and kappa values of the restorative treatment scores based on examinations by four observers. According to all the observers' treatment decisions, the kappa values were found to be 0.341 (p<0.001), 0.471 (p<0.001) and 0.345 (p<0.001) for unaided visual examination, intra-oral camera and operating microscope, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the intraoral camera and the other two methods (p<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the unaided visual examination and operating microscope (p>0.05). As a result of a comparison between the unaided visual examination and operating microscope, the use of an intraoral camera improved the restorative treatment decisions of the occlusal surfaces on posterior teeth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16536194     DOI: 10.2341/04-173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  14 in total

1.  A two-year evaluation of four different fissure sealants.

Authors:  Y Yilmaz; N Beldüz; O Eyüboglu
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-04

2.  In vitro visualization of human endodontic structures using different endoscope systems.

Authors:  Wilfried Engelke; Carolina Leiva; Gunar Wagner; Víctor Beltrán
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Minimal intervention dentistry II: part 1. Contribution of the operating microscope to dentistry.

Authors:  Y Sitbon; T Attathom; A J St-Georges
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Digital photography vs. clinical assessment of resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Cecília Vilela Vasconcelos Barros de Almeida; Karen Pintado-Palomino; João Henrique Parise Fortes; Raphael Jurca Gonçalves da Motta; Bruna Neves de Freitas; Wilson Matsumoto; Maria Tereza Moura de Oliveira Cavalcanti; Josué Alves; Camila Tirapelli
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Performance of a light fluorescence device for the detection of microbial plaque and gingival inflammation.

Authors:  Peter Rechmann; Shasan W Liou; Beate M T Rechmann; John D B Featherstone
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  The efficiency of operating microscope compared with unaided visual examination, conventional and digital intraoral radiography for proximal caries detection.

Authors:  Ilkay Peker; Meryem Toraman Alkurt; Oya Bala; Bulent Altunkaynak
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2009-01-29

7.  Impact of low level magnification on incipient occlusal caries diagnosis and treatment decision making.

Authors:  Neha Sisodia; M K Manjunath
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-08-20

8.  Optical magnification has no benefits on the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars using different visual scoring systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Sabrina Wilde; Priscila-Hernández Campos; Ana-Paula-Marçal Marcondes; Cacio Moura-Netto; Tatiane-Fernandes Novaes; Adrian Lussi; Michele-Baffi Diniz
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-05-01

9.  Comparison of caries detection methods using varying numbers of intra-oral digital photographs with visual examination for epidemiology in children.

Authors:  Uriana Boye; Ian A Pretty; Martin Tickle; Tanya Walsh
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Visual or visual-tactile examination to detect and inform the diagnosis of enamel caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Lucy O'Malley; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.