AIMS: This work studied how prefabricated intraradicular post material affects the mechanical performance of restored teeth. The effect of using two different materials (glass fiber and stainless steel) with significantly different elastic moduli was studied. METHODS: A combined theoretical and experimental method was used: first, an experimental fracture strength test was performed on 60 extracted human maxillary central incisors. The teeth were decoronated, treated endodontically and restored, 30 with glass fiber posts and 30 with stainless steel posts. The data were recorded and the results compared using an ANOVA test. Then, the finite element technique was used to develop a model of the restored tooth. For both post systems, the model allowed for the study of stress distribution patterns on the restored tooth under external loads. RESULTS: For teeth restored with stainless steel posts, a significantly lower failure load was found, as compared with those teeth restored with glass fiber posts (520 N versus 803 N). The estimated distributions confirmed a worse mechanical performance on teeth restored using stainless steel posts, with a high stress concentration due to the significant difference between the elastic moduli of the steel and the surrounding materials. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, post systems, where the elastic modulus of the post is similar to that of dentin and core, have a better biomechanical performance.
AIMS: This work studied how prefabricated intraradicular post material affects the mechanical performance of restored teeth. The effect of using two different materials (glass fiber and stainless steel) with significantly different elastic moduli was studied. METHODS: A combined theoretical and experimental method was used: first, an experimental fracture strength test was performed on 60 extracted human maxillary central incisors. The teeth were decoronated, treated endodontically and restored, 30 with glass fiber posts and 30 with stainless steel posts. The data were recorded and the results compared using an ANOVA test. Then, the finite element technique was used to develop a model of the restored tooth. For both post systems, the model allowed for the study of stress distribution patterns on the restored tooth under external loads. RESULTS: For teeth restored with stainless steel posts, a significantly lower failure load was found, as compared with those teeth restored with glass fiber posts (520 N versus 803 N). The estimated distributions confirmed a worse mechanical performance on teeth restored using stainless steel posts, with a high stress concentration due to the significant difference between the elastic moduli of the steel and the surrounding materials. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, post systems, where the elastic modulus of the post is similar to that of dentin and core, have a better biomechanical performance.
Authors: Gabriel Krastl; Andres Izquierdo; Leonard Büttel; Nicola U Zitzmann; Marc Schmitter; Roland Weiger Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2013-03-16 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Satheesh B Haralur; Anas Abdullah Lahig; Yahya Ahmed Al Hudiry; Abdullah Hassan Al-Shehri; Ahmed Abdullah Al-Malwi Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2017-08-01
Authors: Felice R Grassi; Carmine Pappalettere; Mariasevera Di Comite; Massimo Corsalini; Giorgio Mori; Andrea Ballini; Vito Crincoli; Francesco Pettini; Biagio Rapone; Antonio Boccaccio Journal: Int J Med Sci Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 3.738