Literature DB >> 16536162

Predictors of dental implant survival.

Thomas B Dodson1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To summarize dental implant survival rates under a variety of clinical conditions and identify prognostic variables associated with implant survival. MATERIALS/
METHODS: The articles reviewed in this paper were designed as retrospective cohort studies and composed of three subject cohorts having implants placed between 1992 and 2003. The prognostic variables were categorized as demographic/health status, anatomic, implant-specific, prosthetic, and perioperative/operative. The primary outcome variable was duration of implant survival. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate implant survival rates. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic variables. RESULTS-During the study interval, 921 subjects had 2996 implants placed. Implant survival rates at one year ranged from 90.3 percent for immediate-load implants to 96.2 percent for implants inserted into grafted sinuses. The five-year survivals ranged from 87.9 percent (sinus graft cases) to 91.2 percent (all implants). Frequently cited prognostic variables included tobacco use and implant staging. Other prognostic variables identified included implant length, well size, implant coating, and timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction.
CONCLUSION: Using implants to replace missing teeth is a predictable procedure with five-year survival rates approximating 90 percent. Some of the prognostic variables identified in these studies are under the control, at least to some degree, of the clinician and may be manipulated to enhance implant survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16536162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mass Dent Soc        ISSN: 0025-4800


  4 in total

Review 1.  Applications of microscale technologies for regenerative dentistry.

Authors:  S A Hacking; A Khademhosseini
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction.

Authors:  Maria Victoria Olmedo-Gaya; Francisco Javier Manzano-Moreno; Jose Luis Muñoz-López; Manuel Francisco Vallecillo-Capilla; Candela Reyes-Botella
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Innovative Dental Stem Cell-Based Research Approaches: The Future of Dentistry.

Authors:  Shayee Miran; Thimios A Mitsiadis; Pierfrancesco Pagella
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.443

4.  Comparison of a high and a low intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dentistry setting in Sweden: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Eva Nohlert; Ake Tegelberg; Per Tillgren; Pia Johansson; Andreas Rosenblad; Asgeir R Helgason
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.