Literature DB >> 16535627

Sulfur production by obligately chemolithoautotrophic thiobacillus species.

J M Visser, L A Robertson, H W Van Verseveld, J G Kuenen.   

Abstract

Transient-state experiments with the obligately autotrophic Thiobacillus sp. strain W5 revealed that sulfide oxidation proceeds in two physiological phases, (i) the sulfate-producing phase and (ii) the sulfur- and sulfate-producing phase, after which sulfide toxicity occurs. Specific sulfur-producing characteristics were independent of the growth rate. Sulfur formation was shown to occur when the maximum oxidative capacity of the culture was approached. In order to be able to oxidize increasing amounts of sulfide, the organism has to convert part of the sulfide to sulfur (HS(sup-)(symbl)S(sup0) + H(sup+) + 2e(sup-)) instead of sulfate (HS(sup-) + 4H(inf2)O(symbl)SO(inf4)(sup2-) + 9 H(sup+) + 8e(sup-)), thereby keeping the electron flux constant. Measurements of the in vivo degree of reduction of the cytochrome pool as a function of increasing sulfide supply suggested a redox-related down-regulation of the sulfur oxidation rate. Comparison of the sulfur-producing properties of Thiobacillus sp. strain W5 and Thiobacillus neapolitanus showed that the former has twice the maximum specific sulfide-oxidizing capacity of the latter (3.6 versus 1.9 (mu)mol/mg of protein/min). Their maximum specific oxygen uptake rates were very similar. Significant mechanistic differences in sulfur production between the high-sulfur-producing Thiobacillus sp. strain W5 and the moderate-sulfur-producing species T. neapolitanus were not observed. The limited sulfide-oxidizing capacity of T. neapolitanus appears to be the reason that it can convert only 50% of the incoming sulfide to elemental sulfur.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 16535627      PMCID: PMC1389182          DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.6.2300-2305.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  4 in total

1.  SULPHUR METABOLISM IN THIORHODACEAE. I. QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENTS ON GROWING CELLS OF CHROMATIUM OKENII.

Authors:  H G TRUEPER; H G SCHLEGEL
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1964       Impact factor: 2.271

2.  Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  R K Thauer; K Jungermann; K Decker
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1977-03

3.  In situ determination of the reduction levels of cytochromes b and c in growing bacteria: a case study with N2-fixing Azorhizobium caulinodans.

Authors:  A F Pronk; F C Boogerd; C Stoof; L F Oltmann; A H Stouthamer; H W van Verseveld
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures.

Authors:  C Verduyn; E Postma; W A Scheffers; J P van Dijken
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1990-03
  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of strains CVO and FWKO B, two novel nitrate-reducing, sulfide-oxidizing bacteria isolated from oil field brine.

Authors:  D Gevertz; A J Telang; G Voordouw; G E Jenneman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Distribution, diversity, and activities of sulfur dioxygenases in heterotrophic bacteria.

Authors:  Honglei Liu; Yufeng Xin; Luying Xun
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Elemental sulfur and thiol accumulation in tomato and defense against a fungal vascular pathogen.

Authors:  Jane S Williams; Sharon A Hall; Malcolm J Hawkesford; Michael H Beale; Richard M Cooper
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Succession of internal sulfur cycles and sulfur-oxidizing bacterial communities in microaerophilic wastewater biofilms.

Authors:  Satoshi Okabe; Tsukasa Ito; Kenichi Sugita; Hisashi Satoh
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Rhodaneses minimize the accumulation of cellular sulfane sulfur to avoid disulfide stress during sulfide oxidation in bacteria.

Authors:  Mingxue Ran; Qingbin Li; Yufeng Xin; Shaohua Ma; Rui Zhao; Min Wang; Luying Xun; Yongzhen Xia
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 10.787

6.  The identification of sulfide oxidation as a potential metabolism driving primary production on late Noachian Mars.

Authors:  M C Macey; M Fox-Powell; N K Ramkissoon; B P Stephens; T Barton; S P Schwenzer; V K Pearson; C R Cousins; K Olsson-Francis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Increasing the Selectivity for Sulfur Formation in Biological Gas Desulfurization.

Authors:  Rieks de Rink; Johannes B M Klok; Gijs J van Heeringen; Dimitry Y Sorokin; Annemiek Ter Heijne; Remco Zeijlmaker; Yvonne M Mos; Vinnie de Wilde; Karel J Keesman; Cees J N Buisman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Sulfane Sulfur Posttranslationally Modifies the Global Regulator AdpA to Influence Actinorhodin Production and Morphological Differentiation of Streptomyces coelicolor.

Authors:  Ting Lu; Xiaohua Wu; Qun Cao; Yongzhen Xia; Luying Xun; Huaiwei Liu
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 7.786

9.  Persulfide Dioxygenase From Acidithiobacillus caldus: Variable Roles of Cysteine Residues and Hydrogen Bond Networks of the Active Site.

Authors:  Patrick Rühl; Patrick Haas; Dominik Seipel; Jan Becker; Arnulf Kletzin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Microbiological Sulfide Removal-From Microorganism Isolation to Treatment of Industrial Effluent.

Authors:  Zhendong Yang; Zhenghua Liu; Aleksandra Sklodowska; Marcin Musialowski; Tomasz Bajda; Huaqun Yin; Lukasz Drewniak
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-03-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.