Literature DB >> 16534705

Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider ring: an EBRA analysis of 40 cup revisions.

Thomas Ilchmann1, Jan Philipp Gelzer, Eugen Winter, Kuno Weise.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the bone stock and fixation of the implant remain challenging problems in revision surgery. In this retrospective study, we wanted to gain information on initial stability and wear after revision with the Burch-Schneider ring. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1994 and 1998, we performed 70 reconstructions of the acetabulum with a Burch-Schneider ring in revision arthroplasty. 63 patients could be followed up clinically and radiographically. 40 cups were suitable for EBRA measurements whereas migration and wear could not be assessed by this method in 23 cases due to lack of comparability of pelvic radiographs. The mean follow-up time was 4.7 years.
RESULTS: 2 cups were re-revised and 14 cups had breakage or changes of position of the screws. 30 cups showed detectable migration and 18 cups detectable wear. The mean migration was 2.8 mm and the mean wear rate was 0.12 mm/year. 16 cups had detectable migration after 1 year; 11 of these 16 continued to migrate and 9 of them had screw breakage. Both re-revisions showed early migration. Early migration correlated with later screw breakage and the overall migration correlated with wear. The only risk factor found for early migration was the wear rate.
INTERPRETATION: The Burch-Schneider ring is an established and reliable implant for cup revision with good clinical results, but it seems to be difficult to maintain intraoperative stability. The implants with continuous migration may lead to late clinical failure and require further observation. Wear may contribute to migration and resorption of the bone graft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16534705     DOI: 10.1080/17453670610045722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  8 in total

1.  Outcome of cages in revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Matteo Olivero; Luigi Branca Vergano; Alessandro Massè
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-01-10

2.  One-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty: outcome of 39 consecutive hips.

Authors:  Thomas Ilchmann; Werner Zimmerli; Peter Emil Ochsner; Bernhard Kessler; Lukas Zwicky; Peter Graber; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases].

Authors:  U J Schlegel; R G Bitsch; M Pritsch; P R Aldinger; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Infectiological, functional, and radiographic outcome after revision for prosthetic hip infection according to a strict algorithm.

Authors:  F Harald R De Man; Parham Sendi; Werner Zimmerli; Thomas B Maurer; Peter E Ochsner; Thomas Ilchmann
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Migration pattern of cementless press fit cups in the presence of stabilizing screws in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Zilkens; S Djalali; B Bittersohl; T Kälicke; C N Kraft; R Krauspe; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  Excellent long-term results of the Müller acetabular reinforcement ring in primary cup revision.

Authors:  Pascal Mueller Greber; Isabella Manzoni; Peter E Ochsner; Thomas Ilchmann; Lukas Zwicky; Martin Clauss
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Ingrid Bonetti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Acetabular defect classification and management : Revision arthroplasty of the acetabular cup based on 3-point fixation.

Authors:  Mohamed Ghanem; Dirk Zajonz; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde; Andreas Roth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.