Literature DB >> 16534036

An intervention to overcome clinical inertia and improve diabetes mellitus control in a primary care setting: Improving Primary Care of African Americans with Diabetes (IPCAAD) 8.

David C Ziemer1, Joyce P Doyle, Catherine S Barnes, William T Branch, Curtiss B Cook, Imad M El-Kebbi, Daniel L Gallina, Paul Kolm, Mary K Rhee, Lawrence S Phillips.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although clinical trials have shown that proper management of diabetes can improve outcomes, and treatment guidelines are widespread, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in the United States are rising. Since process measures are improving, poor glycemic control may reflect the failure of health care providers to intensify diabetes therapy when indicated--clinical inertia. We asked whether interventions aimed at health care provider behavior could overcome this barrier and improve glycemic control.
METHODS: In a 3-year trial, 345 internal medicine residents were randomized to be controls or to receive computerized reminders providing patient-specific recommendations at each visit and/or feedback on performance every 2 weeks. When glucose levels exceeded 150 mg/dL (8.33 mmol/L) during visits of 4038 patients, health care provider behavior was characterized as did nothing, did anything (any intensification of therapy), or did enough (if intensification met recommendations).
RESULTS: At baseline, residents did anything for 35% of visits and did enough for 21% of visits when changes in therapy were indicated, and there were no differences among intervention groups. During the trial, intensification increased most during the first year and then declined. However, intensification increased more in the feedback alone and feedback plus reminders groups than for reminders alone and control groups (P<.001). After 3 years, health care provider behavior in the reminders alone and control groups returned to baseline, whereas improvement with feedback alone and feedback plus reminders groups was sustained: 52% did anything, and 30% did enough (P<.001 for both vs the reminders alone and control groups). Multivariable analysis showed that feedback on performance contributed independently to intensification and that intensification contributed independently to fall in HbA1c (P<.001 for both).
CONCLUSIONS: Feedback on performance given to medical resident primary care providers improved provider behavior and lowered HbA1c levels. Similar approaches may aid health care provider behavior and improve diabetes outcomes in other primary care settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16534036     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.5.507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  42 in total

1.  A novel approach to quality improvement in a safety-net practice: concurrent peer review visits.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Ellen Volpe; Paul Winters; Melissa Brown; Amna Idris; Tricia Harren
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  Quality of Diabetes Care in the USA.

Authors:  Ben Alencherry; Dennis Bruemmer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medical record based clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Todd P Gilmer; Patrick J O'Connor; JoAnn M Sperl-Hillen; William A Rush; Paul E Johnson; Gerald H Amundson; Stephen E Asche; Heidi L Ekstrom
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Sustained Reduction in Health Disparities Achieved through Targeted Quality Improvement: One-Year Follow-up on a Three-Year Intervention.

Authors:  Ran D Balicer; Moshe Hoshen; Chandra Cohen-Stavi; Sivan Shohat-Spitzer; Calanit Kay; Haim Bitterman; Nicky Lieberman; Orit Jacobson; Efrat Shadmi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  The use of quality improvement and health information technology approaches to improve diabetes outcomes in African American and Hispanic patients.

Authors:  Arshiya A Baig; Abigail E Wilkes; Andrew M Davis; Monica E Peek; Elbert S Huang; Douglas S Bell; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 6.  Clinical Decision Support Systems and Prevention: A Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gibril J Njie; Krista K Proia; Anilkrishna B Thota; Ramona K C Finnie; David P Hopkins; Starr M Banks; David B Callahan; Nicolaas P Pronk; Kimberly J Rask; Daniel T Lackland; Thomas E Kottke
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Utility of prompting physicians for brief alcohol consumption intervention.

Authors:  Gail L Rose; Dennis A Plante; Colleen S Thomas; Laura J Denton; John E Helzer
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 8.  Computerized prompting and feedback of diabetes care: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Suzanne Austin Boren; Aaron M Puchbauer; Faustine Williams
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

9.  Diabetes management in urban African Americans: review of a public hospital experience.

Authors:  David C Ziemer; Imad M El-Kebbi; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Mary K Rhee; Lawrence S Phillips; Curtiss B Cook
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.847

10.  Customized feedback to patients and providers failed to improve safety or quality of diabetes care: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Connor; JoAnn Sperl-Hillen; Paul E Johnson; William A Rush; A Lauren Crain
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 17.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.