Literature DB >> 16533765

Kinetics of metastatic breast cancer cell trafficking in bone.

Pushkar A Phadke1, Robyn R Mercer, John F Harms, Yujiang Jia, Andra R Frost, Jennifer L Jewell, Karen M Bussard, Shakira Nelson, Cynthia Moore, John C Kappes, Carol V Gay, Andrea M Mastro, Danny R Welch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In vivo studies have focused on the latter stages of the bone metastatic process (osteolysis), whereas little is known about earlier events, e.g., arrival, localization, and initial colonization. Defining these initial steps may potentially identify the critical points susceptible to therapeutic intervention. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: MDA-MB-435 human breast cancer cells engineered with green fluorescent protein were injected into the cardiac left ventricle of athymic mice. Femurs were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy, immunohistochemistry, real-time PCR, flow cytometry, and histomorphometry at times ranging from 1 hour to 6 weeks.
RESULTS: Single cells were found in distal metaphyses at 1 hour postinjection and remained as single cells up to 72 hours. Diaphyseal arrest occurred rarely and few cells remained there after 24 hours. At 1 week, numerous foci (2-10 cells) were observed, mostly adjacent to osteoblast-like cells. By 2 weeks, fewer but larger foci (> or =50 cells) were seen. Most bones had a single large mass at 4 weeks (originating from a colony or coalescing foci) which extended into the diaphysis by 4 to 6 weeks. Little change (<20%) in osteoblast or osteoclast numbers was observed at 2 weeks, but at 4 to 6 weeks, osteoblasts were dramatically reduced (8% of control), whereas osteoclasts were reduced modestly (to approximately 60% of control).
CONCLUSIONS: Early arrest in metaphysis and minimal retention in diaphysis highlight the importance of the local milieu in determining metastatic potential. These results extend the Seed and Soil hypothesis by demonstrating both intertissue and intratissue differences governing metastatic location. Ours is the first in vivo evidence that tumor cells influence not only osteoclasts, as widely believed, but also eliminate functional osteoblasts, thereby restructuring the bone microenvironment to favor osteolysis. The data may also explain why patients receiving bisphosphonates fail to heal bone despite inhibiting resorption, implying that concurrent strategies that restore osteoblast function are needed to effectively treat osteolytic bone metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16533765      PMCID: PMC1523260          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  46 in total

1.  Whole-body optical imaging of green fluorescent protein-expressing tumors and metastases.

Authors:  M Yang; E Baranov; P Jiang; F X Sun; X M Li; L Li; S Hasegawa; M Bouvet; M Al-Tuwaijri; T Chishima; H Shimada; A R Moossa; S Penman; R M Hoffman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Maintaining GFP tissue fluorescence through bone decalcification and long-term storage.

Authors:  John F Harms; Lynn R Budgeon; Neil D Christensen; Danny R Welch
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 3.  Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Gregory R Mundy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Breast cancer metastasis to bone: evolving models and research challenges.

Authors:  D R Welch; J F Harms; A M Mastro; C V Gay; H J Donahue
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.041

5.  Prostate cancer cells promote osteoblastic bone metastases through Wnts.

Authors:  Christopher L Hall; Anna Bafico; Jinlu Dai; Stuart A Aaronson; Evan T Keller
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Molecular mechanisms of tumor-bone interactions in osteolytic metastases.

Authors:  J M Chirgwin; T A Guise
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.807

7.  Lentiviral vector transduction of hematopoietic stem cells that mediate long-term reconstitution of lethally irradiated mice.

Authors:  W Chen; X Wu; D N Levasseur; H Liu; L Lai; J C Kappes; T M Townes
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 8.  Skeletal complications of malignancy.

Authors:  R E Coleman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Osteolytic bone metastasis in breast cancer.

Authors:  T Yoneda; A Sasaki; G R Mundy
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  New bisphosphonates in the treatment of bone metastases.

Authors:  S D Averbuch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  59 in total

1.  Non-invasive assessment of failure torque in rat bones with simulated lytic lesions using computed tomography based structural rigidity analysis.

Authors:  Vahid Entezari; Pamela A Basto; Vartan Vartanians; David Zurakowski; Brian D Snyder; Ara Nazarian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Extracellular engagement of alpha6 integrin inhibited urokinase-type plasminogen activator-mediated cleavage and delayed human prostate bone metastasis.

Authors:  Michael O Ports; Ray B Nagle; Gerald D Pond; Anne E Cress
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Combined micro CT and histopathology for evaluation of skeletal metastasis in live animals.

Authors:  Christopher P Geffre; Erika Pond; Gerald D Pond; Isis C Sroka; Jaime M Gard; Bethany A Skovan; William E Meek; Terry H Landowski; Raymond B Nagle; Anne E Cress
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Ex-vivo analysis of the bone microenvironment in bone metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Karen M Bussard; Andrea M Mastro
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Localization of osteoblast inflammatory cytokines MCP-1 and VEGF to the matrix of the trabecula of the femur, a target area for metastatic breast cancer cell colonization.

Authors:  Karen M Bussard; Noriaki Okita; Neil Sharkey; Thomas Neuberger; Andrew Webb; Andrea M Mastro
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Inhibition of mammary tumor growth and metastases to bone and liver by dietary grape polyphenols.

Authors:  Linette Castillo-Pichardo; Michelle M Martínez-Montemayor; Joel E Martínez; Kristin M Wall; Luis A Cubano; Suranganie Dharmawardhane
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  ADAMTS1 and MMP1 proteolytically engage EGF-like ligands in an osteolytic signaling cascade for bone metastasis.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Qiongqing Wang; Guohong Hu; Catherine Van Poznak; Martin Fleisher; Michael Reiss; Joan Massagué; Yibin Kang
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Tumor-supportive and osteoclastogenic changes induced by breast cancer-derived factors are reversed by inhibition of {gamma}-secretase.

Authors:  Jenna E Fong; Damien Le Nihouannen; Svetlana V Komarova
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  The lysyl oxidase inhibitor, beta-aminopropionitrile, diminishes the metastatic colonization potential of circulating breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Alla Bondareva; Charlene M Downey; Fabio Ayres; Wei Liu; Steven K Boyd; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Frank R Jirik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The controversial clinicobiological role of breast cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Claudia Casarsa; Saro Oriana; Danila Coradini
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.