| Literature DB >> 16533527 |
Marta Gomez-Nunez1, Javier Pinilla-Ibarz, Tao Dao, Rena J May, Mary Pao, Jaspreet S Jaggi, David A Scheinberg.
Abstract
The ability to reliably identify the peptides that can bind to MHC molecules is of practical importance for rapid vaccine development. Several computer-based prediction methods have been applied to study the interaction of MHC class I/peptide binding. Here we have compared the binding of peptides predicted by three algorithms (BIMAS, SYFPEITHI and Rankpep) to the binding of the peptides to HLA-A*0201 molecules in vitro, assessed using a MHC stabilization assay on live T2 cells. Fifty HLA-A*0201 peptides were selected from several target oncoproteins: Wilms' tumor protein (WT1), native and imatinib-mutated bcr-abl p210, JAK2 protein and Ewing's sarcoma fusion protein type 1. The sensitivity and specificity of BIMAS, SYFPEITHI and Rankpep respectively, were: 86%, and 82%; 75% and 73%; 64% and 82%. Combining two or more computer methods did not appear to significantly improve the predictive value.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16533527 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2006.02.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Res ISSN: 0145-2126 Impact factor: 3.156