BACKGROUND: A total of 10 455 new dermatology patients were seen in the dermatology clinics of King Fahad Hospital of the University (KFHU), Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, between January 1990 and December 1995. We identified 71 patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of specific forms of primary hereditary ichthyoses (PHI). We have reviewed the epidemiological and clinical features of these patients. OBJECTIVE: To document the epidemiological and clinical features of patients with PHI in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We used the dermatology out-patient department (OPD) logbooks to identify cases of PHI from new patients presenting with different dermatological problems over a 6-year period. We used specifically designed protocol forms to extract epidemiological and clinical data from the study patients' medical records. These were entered into a computer database and analyzed using standard statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients, 44 males and 27 females (male : female sex ratio of 1.63 : 1), were identified from a total of 10 455 new patients seen in our dermatology clinics between January 1990 and December 1995. The occurrence rate of PHI, in our clinics, was 0.67% or 7 per 1000 new dermatology cases. The clinical pattern of PHI showed that Icthyosis Vulgaris was the most common form seen, followed by Nonbullous Ichthyosiform Erythroderma. Thirty-one patients (44.7%) with Ichthyosis Vulgaris (IV) were seen: 12 patients (16.9%) with X-linked Recessive Ichthyosis (XLRI), four patients (5.6%) with Lamellar Ichthyosis (LI), three patients (4.2%) with Bullous Ichthyosiform Erythroderma (BIE) and 21 patients (29.6%) with Nonbullous Ichthyosiform Erythroderma (NBIE). There was a significantly high consanguinity rate in our patients (85%), and the family history was positive in 53 cases out of the 71 (75%). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study is the first report of its kind from Saudi Arabia and documents the clinico-epidemiological features of PHI patients in the Eastern Province. The high rate of parental consanguinity among our Saudi patients may account for the high proportion of patients with a positive family history. Consanguinity also probably explains why the most severe forms of PHI were seen in a significant number of new patients' siblings. These severe forms of PHI (Nonbullous Ichthyosiform Erythroderma, Bullous Ichthyosiform Erythroderma and Lamellar Ichthyosis) together constituted nearly 40% of all cases.
BACKGROUND: A total of 10 455 new dermatology patients were seen in the dermatology clinics of King Fahad Hospital of the University (KFHU), Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, between January 1990 and December 1995. We identified 71 patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of specific forms of primary hereditary ichthyoses (PHI). We have reviewed the epidemiological and clinical features of these patients. OBJECTIVE: To document the epidemiological and clinical features of patients with PHI in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. METHODS: We used the dermatology out-patient department (OPD) logbooks to identify cases of PHI from new patients presenting with different dermatological problems over a 6-year period. We used specifically designed protocol forms to extract epidemiological and clinical data from the study patients' medical records. These were entered into a computer database and analyzed using standard statistical software. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients, 44 males and 27 females (male : female sex ratio of 1.63 : 1), were identified from a total of 10 455 new patients seen in our dermatology clinics between January 1990 and December 1995. The occurrence rate of PHI, in our clinics, was 0.67% or 7 per 1000 new dermatology cases. The clinical pattern of PHI showed that Icthyosis Vulgaris was the most common form seen, followed by Nonbullous Ichthyosiform Erythroderma. Thirty-one patients (44.7%) with Ichthyosis Vulgaris (IV) were seen: 12 patients (16.9%) with X-linked Recessive Ichthyosis (XLRI), four patients (5.6%) with Lamellar Ichthyosis (LI), three patients (4.2%) with Bullous Ichthyosiform Erythroderma (BIE) and 21 patients (29.6%) with Nonbullous Ichthyosiform Erythroderma (NBIE). There was a significantly high consanguinity rate in our patients (85%), and the family history was positive in 53 cases out of the 71 (75%). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study is the first report of its kind from Saudi Arabia and documents the clinico-epidemiological features of PHI patients in the Eastern Province. The high rate of parental consanguinity among our Saudi patients may account for the high proportion of patients with a positive family history. Consanguinity also probably explains why the most severe forms of PHI were seen in a significant number of new patients' siblings. These severe forms of PHI (Nonbullous Ichthyosiform Erythroderma, Bullous Ichthyosiform Erythroderma and Lamellar Ichthyosis) together constituted nearly 40% of all cases.