Literature DB >> 16532913

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor does not always improve maternal satisfaction.

Eeva Nikkola1, Arja Läärä, Susanna Hinkka, Ulla Ekblad, Pentti Kero, Markku Salonen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor with bupivacaine and fentanyl provides more satisfaction to mothers than intermittent bolus epidural analgesia or patient-controlled epidural analgesia with plain bupivacaine.
METHODS: Ninety mothers with term, uncomplicated pregnancies were randomized to receive intermittent bolus epidural analgesia (bupivacaine + fentanyl), patient-controlled epidural analgesia (bupivacaine + fentanyl), or patient-controlled epidural analgesia (bupivacaine). Pain during labor was evaluated with a visual analog scale. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were recorded. After delivery, the mothers were given a questionnaire covering the following themes: experience of labor pain, feeling of control, fears and expectations associated with pregnancy/with delivery/with becoming a mother, as well as pain, physical condition and emotions after delivery. To elaborate on these answers, 30 mothers were further randomized to a semistructured interview, in which the same topics were discussed. The main outcome measure was maternal satisfaction.
RESULTS: The intermittent bolus epidural analgesia group felt they could influence labor most (p = 0.03), and in the interview they expressed most satisfaction. In this group, the total drug utilization was smallest (bupivacaine: p <0.0001 comparing all groups, fentanyl: p = 0.03 comparing the two fentanyl-receiving groups). No differences in pain occurred. Vomiting (p = 0.04) and pruritus (p <0.0001) were more common or more severe in the groups receiving fentanyl.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no advantages for patient-controlled epidural analgesia over intermittent bolus epidural analgesia in terms of maternal satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16532913     DOI: 10.1080/00016340500409935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  4 in total

1.  A Meta-Analysis of Comparing Intermittent Epidural Boluses and Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia.

Authors:  I-Shiang Tzeng; Ming-Chang Kao; Po-Ting Pan; Chu-Ting Chen; Han-Yu Lin; Po-Chun Hsieh; Chan-Yen Kuo; Tsung-Han Hsieh; Woon-Man Kung; Chu-Hsuan Cheng; Kuo-Hu Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  A double-blind study on analgesic effects of fentanyl combined with bupivacaine for extradural labor analgesia.

Authors:  Gaurav S Tomar; Rajan B Godwin; Neeraj Gaur; Ashish Sethi; Neeraj Narang; Veena Kachhwaha; T C Kriplani; Akhilesh Tiwari
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jul-Dec

3.  Women's experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Gill Thomson; Claire Feeley; Victoria Hall Moran; Soo Downe; Olufemi T Oladapo
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Qualitative exploration of women's experiences of intramuscular pethidine or remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia for labour pain.

Authors:  Victoria Hall Moran; Gillian Thomson; Julie Cook; Hannah Storey; Leanne Beeson; Christine MacArthur; Matthew Wilson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.