Literature DB >> 16532782

Magnetic resonance compatibility of multichannel silicon microelectrode systems for neural recording and stimulation: design criteria, tests, and recommendations.

Francisco M Martínez Santiesteban1, Scott D Swanson, Douglas C Noll, David J Anderson.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) compatibility of biomedical implants and devices represents a challenge for designers and potential risks for users. This paper addresses these problems and presents the first MR-compatible multichannel silicon chronic microelectrode system, used for recording and electrical stimulation of the central nervous system for animal models. A standard chronic assembly, from the Center for Neural Communication Technology at the University of Michigan, was tested on a 2 Tesla magnet to detect forces, heating, and image distortions, and modified to minimize or eliminate susceptibility artifacts, tissue damage, and electrode displacement, maintaining good image quality and safety to the animals. Multiple commercial connectors were tested for MR compatibility and several options for the reference electrode were also tested to minimize image artifacts and provide a stable biocompatible reference for shortand long-term neural recordings. Different holding screws were tested to anchor the microelectrode assembly on the top of the skull. The final selection of this part was based on MR-compatibility, biocompatibility, durability, and mechanical and chemical stability. The required adaptor to interconnect the MR-compatible microelectrode with standard data acquisition systems was also designed and fabricated. The final design is fully MR-compatible and has been successfully tested on guinea pigs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16532782     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2005.864497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  6 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided vascular interventions.

Authors:  Cengizhan Ozturk; Michael Guttman; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-10

Review 2.  Microfabricated implants for applications in therapeutic delivery, tissue engineering, and biosensing.

Authors:  Kristy M Ainslie; Tejal A Desai
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  Reference-Free Adaptive Filtering of Extracellular Neural Signals Recording in Ultra-High Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners: Removal of Periodic Interferences.

Authors:  Corey E Cruttenden; Jennifer M Taylor; Mahdi Ahmadi; Yi Zhang; Xiao-Hong Zhu; Wei Chen; Rajesh Rajamani
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.880

4.  Hemocompatibility of silicon-based substrates for biomedical implant applications.

Authors:  Lalitha Muthusubramaniam; Rachel Lowe; William H Fissell; Lingyan Li; Roger E Marchant; Tejal A Desai; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Hydrogel-Based Organic Subdural Electrode with High Conformability to Brain Surface.

Authors:  Shuntaro Oribe; Shotaro Yoshida; Shinya Kusama; Shin-Ichiro Osawa; Atsuhiro Nakagawa; Masaki Iwasaki; Teiji Tominaga; Matsuhiko Nishizawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Glassy carbon microelectrodes minimize induced voltages, mechanical vibrations, and artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Surabhi Nimbalkar; Erwin Fuhrer; Pedro Silva; Tri Nguyen; Martin Sereno; Sam Kassegne; Jan Korvink
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 7.127

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.