PURPOSE: We determined the effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) supplementation during resistance training. METHODS:Seventy-six subjects were randomized to receive CLA (5 g.d(-1)) or placebo (PLA) for 7 wk while resistance training 3 d.wk(-1). Seventeen subjects crossed over to the opposite group for an additional 7 wk. Measurements at baseline, 7 wk, and 14 wk (for subjects in the crossover study) included body composition, muscle thickness of the elbow flexors and knee extensors, resting metabolic rate (RMR), bench and leg press strength, knee extension torque, and urinary markers of myofibrillar degradation (3-methylhistidine (3MH) and bone resorption (cross-linked N-telopeptides (Ntx)). RESULTS: After 7 wk the CLA group had greater increases in lean tissue mass (LTM) (+1.4 vs +0.2 kg; P < 0.05), greater losses of fat mass (-0.8 vs +0.4 kg; P < 0.05), and a smaller increase in 3MH (-0.1 vs + 1.3 micromol.kg LTM.d(-1); P < 0.05) compared with PLA. Changes between groups were similar for all other measurements, except for a greater increase in bench press strength for males on CLA (P < 0.05). In the crossover study subjects had minimal changes in body composition, but smaller increases in 3MH (-1.2 vs +2.2 micromol.kg LTM.d(-1); P < 0.01) and NTx (-4.8 vs +7.3 nmol.kg(-1) LTM.d(-1); P < 0.01) while on CLA versus PLA. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with CLA during resistance training results in relatively small changes in body composition accompanied by a lessening of the catabolic effect of training on muscle protein.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: We determined the effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) supplementation during resistance training. METHODS: Seventy-six subjects were randomized to receive CLA (5 g.d(-1)) or placebo (PLA) for 7 wk while resistance training 3 d.wk(-1). Seventeen subjects crossed over to the opposite group for an additional 7 wk. Measurements at baseline, 7 wk, and 14 wk (for subjects in the crossover study) included body composition, muscle thickness of the elbow flexors and knee extensors, resting metabolic rate (RMR), bench and leg press strength, knee extension torque, and urinary markers of myofibrillar degradation (3-methylhistidine (3MH) and bone resorption (cross-linked N-telopeptides (Ntx)). RESULTS: After 7 wk the CLA group had greater increases in lean tissue mass (LTM) (+1.4 vs +0.2 kg; P < 0.05), greater losses of fat mass (-0.8 vs +0.4 kg; P < 0.05), and a smaller increase in 3MH (-0.1 vs + 1.3 micromol.kg LTM.d(-1); P < 0.05) compared with PLA. Changes between groups were similar for all other measurements, except for a greater increase in bench press strength for males on CLA (P < 0.05). In the crossover study subjects had minimal changes in body composition, but smaller increases in 3MH (-1.2 vs +2.2 micromol.kg LTM.d(-1); P < 0.01) and NTx (-4.8 vs +7.3 nmol.kg(-1) LTM.d(-1); P < 0.01) while on CLA versus PLA. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with CLA during resistance training results in relatively small changes in body composition accompanied by a lessening of the catabolic effect of training on muscle protein.
Authors: Darren G Candow; Philip D Chilibeck; Marina Facci; Saman Abeysekara; Gordon A Zello Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2006-06-10 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Chad M Kerksick; Colin D Wilborn; Michael D Roberts; Abbie Smith-Ryan; Susan M Kleiner; Ralf Jäger; Rick Collins; Mathew Cooke; Jaci N Davis; Elfego Galvan; Mike Greenwood; Lonnie M Lowery; Robert Wildman; Jose Antonio; Richard B Kreider Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Darren G Candow; Philip D Chilibeck; Krissy Weisgarber; Emelie Vogt; Adam D G Baxter-Jones Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 12.910