M H Ali1, P Kalima, S R J Maxwell. 1. Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rational antimicrobial therapy should provide maximum benefit to patients while minimizing the development of resistant microorganisms. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate (i) which antimicrobial drugs were chosen by hospital doctors faced with two common infections [community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and urinary tract infection (UTI)], (ii) whether these choices were compliant with local guidance and (iii) the factors that influenced antimicrobial choice. METHODS: A questionnaire based on two hypothetical clinical scenarios was distributed to 316 hospital doctors across four UK NHS hospitals in two cities (Newcastle and Edinburgh). RESULTS: Doctors in Newcastle were significantly more aggressive in their management: more patients were admitted (CAP: 78.9% versus 48.4%, P < 0.05) and given antimicrobials intravenously (CAP: 53.4% versus 21.2%, P < 0.05). Adherence to the local hospital guideline for CAP was significantly higher in Newcastle (83.3% versus 38.0%; P < 0.05). Fewer than half of the doctors surveyed used the local hospital guideline when choosing an antimicrobial, and the British National Formulary was the most frequently used resource (>90%). Junior doctors also identified medical school teaching and opinions of senior doctors as important influences. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights inadequacies in the implementation and promotion of local guidelines, and demonstrates the potential for widely varying antimicrobial practices in two comparable UK cities.
BACKGROUND: Rational antimicrobial therapy should provide maximum benefit to patients while minimizing the development of resistant microorganisms. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate (i) which antimicrobial drugs were chosen by hospital doctors faced with two common infections [community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and urinary tract infection (UTI)], (ii) whether these choices were compliant with local guidance and (iii) the factors that influenced antimicrobial choice. METHODS: A questionnaire based on two hypothetical clinical scenarios was distributed to 316 hospital doctors across four UK NHS hospitals in two cities (Newcastle and Edinburgh). RESULTS: Doctors in Newcastle were significantly more aggressive in their management: more patients were admitted (CAP: 78.9% versus 48.4%, P < 0.05) and given antimicrobials intravenously (CAP: 53.4% versus 21.2%, P < 0.05). Adherence to the local hospital guideline for CAP was significantly higher in Newcastle (83.3% versus 38.0%; P < 0.05). Fewer than half of the doctors surveyed used the local hospital guideline when choosing an antimicrobial, and the British National Formulary was the most frequently used resource (>90%). Junior doctors also identified medical school teaching and opinions of senior doctors as important influences. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights inadequacies in the implementation and promotion of local guidelines, and demonstrates the potential for widely varying antimicrobial practices in two comparable UK cities.
Authors: Veronika Tchesnokova; Hovhannes Avagyan; Elena Rechkina; Diana Chan; Mariya Muradova; Helen Ghirmai Haile; Matthew Radey; Scott Weissman; Kim Riddell; Delia Scholes; James R Johnson; Evgeni V Sokurenko Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michelle T Hecker; Clinton J Fox; Andrea H Son; Rita K Cydulka; Jonathan E Siff; Charles L Emerman; Ajay K Sethi; Christine P Muganda; Curtis J Donskey Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: L A Coyne; S M Latham; N J Williams; S Dawson; I J Donald; R B Pearson; R F Smith; G L Pinchbeck Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 5.790