Literature DB >> 16531175

Consistency between most important reasons for using contraception and current method used: the influence of health care providers.

Georgine Lamvu1, Markus J Steiner, Sean Condon, Katherine Hartmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors related to consistency between women's "most important" reason for using contraception and their current contraceptive method.
METHODS: A sample of 433 women completed a written questionnaire on demographics, contraceptive use history and the "most important" reason for using contraception. Women were grouped by whether their current contraceptive method "agreed" or "disagreed" with their "most important" reason for contracepting. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with consistency between stated "most important" reason and current method used ("agreed").
RESULTS: Current contraceptive method was inconsistent with the "most important" reason for using a method in 25% of women. Demographic characteristics and knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness did not differ between the "agreed" and "disagreed" groups. Women using a method consistent with their reason were more likely to have discussed contraception with a health care provider (RR=1.59, 95% CI 1.13-2.25) even after adjusting for source of contraceptive method or source of contraceptive information (RR=1.57, 95% CI 1.10-2.23).
CONCLUSION: Contact with a health care provider was the only factor associated with consistency between birth control method and reasons for initiating contraception. This association appears to be independent of knowledge about contraceptive effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16531175     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

1.  The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Gina M Secura; Robert F Nease; Mary C Politi; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Regulatory approval time for hormonal contraception in Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom, 2000-2015: a retrospective data analysis.

Authors:  Christine Troskie; Judith A Soon; Arianne Y Albert; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-11-03

3.  Hormonal contraceptive method choice among young, low-income women: how important is the provider?

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Beth A Brown; Anne Foster-Rosales; Tina R Raine
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-09-15

4.  Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.

Authors:  Rachel Paul; Bridget C Huysman; Ragini Maddipati; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Contraceptive practices and pregnancy intendedness among pregnant adolescents.

Authors:  Wakul Lanjakornsiripan; Siriruthai Amnatbuddee; Kanok Seejorn; Yuthapong Werawatakul; Pilaiwan Kleebkaow; Ratana Komwilaisak; Sanguanchoke Luanratanakorn
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-03-20

6.  Use of Contraception and Attitudes towards Contraceptive Use in Swedish Women--A Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Helena Kopp Kallner; Louise Thunell; Jan Brynhildsen; Mia Lindeberg; Kristina Gemzell Danielsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Introduction of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in Kenya through mobile outreach: review of service statistics and provider perspectives.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Vitalis Akora; Rose Masaba; Mario Chen; Valentine Veena
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2014-01-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.