OBJECTIVE: To review the incidence, risk factors, and treatment options of intraoperative and postoperative complications of stone basketing in urology with emphasis on certain principles that must be upheld to prevent those complications. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database on stone basketing between 1970 and 2005. RESULTS: Iatrogenic trauma due to retrieval of a stone is well known but the exact incidence is difficult to ascertain. Rarely, stone basketing can cause major trauma to the ureter, such as avulsion or intussusception, requiring open or laparoscopic intervention for ureteral continuity restoration. Mucosal abrasion, ureteral perforation, and stricture formation have also been described as complications of stone basketing. Occasionally, the engaged or broken basket can provoke anxiety even for experienced urologists. Factors that increase the risk of complications, strategies for repair, and techniques for prevention are discussed extensively. CONCLUSION: Infrequent, surgical misadventures during stone basketing can occur and must be treated appropriately. Careful attention to instrument selection and surgical techniques and awareness of risk factors and type and site of potential injury are essential to reduce these complications.
OBJECTIVE: To review the incidence, risk factors, and treatment options of intraoperative and postoperative complications of stone basketing in urology with emphasis on certain principles that must be upheld to prevent those complications. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database on stone basketing between 1970 and 2005. RESULTS:Iatrogenic trauma due to retrieval of a stone is well known but the exact incidence is difficult to ascertain. Rarely, stone basketing can cause major trauma to the ureter, such as avulsion or intussusception, requiring open or laparoscopic intervention for ureteral continuity restoration. Mucosal abrasion, ureteral perforation, and stricture formation have also been described as complications of stone basketing. Occasionally, the engaged or broken basket can provoke anxiety even for experienced urologists. Factors that increase the risk of complications, strategies for repair, and techniques for prevention are discussed extensively. CONCLUSION: Infrequent, surgical misadventures during stone basketing can occur and must be treated appropriately. Careful attention to instrument selection and surgical techniques and awareness of risk factors and type and site of potential injury are essential to reduce these complications.
Authors: F Berardinelli; L Cindolo; P De Francesco; S Proietti; D Hennessey; O Dalpiaz; C M Cracco; F Pellegrini; C M Scoffone; L Schips; G Giusti Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Mathew D Sorensen; Anup R Shah; Michael S Canney; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Joel M H Teichman; Michael R Bailey Journal: J Endourol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: J Hogan Randall; Raphael V Carrera; Paul J Fletcher; David A Duchene; Kerri L Thurmon; Donald A Neff; Wilson R Molina Journal: World J Urol Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jorge F Lazo; Aldo Marzullo; Sara Moccia; Michele Catellani; Benoit Rosa; Michel de Mathelin; Elena De Momi Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 2.924