Literature DB >> 16530916

Specialist nurse supported discharge in gynaecology: a randomised comparison and economic evaluation.

Heather A Dawes1, Teresa Docherty, Isabel Traynor, David H Gilmore, Alan G Jardine, Robin Knill-Jones.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the effect on quality of life and cost effectiveness of specialist nurse early supported discharge for women undergoing major abdominal and/or pelvic surgery for benign gynaecological disease compared with routine care. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial comparing specialist nurse supported discharge with routine hospital care in gynaecology. The SF-36, a generic health status questionnaire, was used to measure women's evaluation of their health state before surgery and at 6 weeks after surgery. A further questionnaire scoring patient symptoms, milestones of recovery, information given and satisfaction, was administered prior to discharge from hospital and at 6 weeks thereafter.
SETTING: Gynaecology service at the Western Infirmary Glasgow, part of North Glasgow University, NHS Trust. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and eleven women scheduled for major abdominal or pelvic surgery for benign gynaecological disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SF-36 health survey questionnaire baseline scores were reported before surgery and at 6 weeks follow-up. Complications, length of hospital stay, readmission, information on discharge support and satisfaction of women were recorded at discharge from hospital and at 6 weeks follow-up. A cost consequence analysis was conducted based on the perspective of the NHS.
RESULTS: The addition of a specialist nurse to routine hospital care in gynaecology significantly reduced the post-operative length of hospital stay p = 0.001, improved information delivery and satisfaction of women. The specialist nurse supported discharge group was associated with significantly lower total costs to the NHS than routine care resulting principally from the difference in the cost of the post-operative length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing major abdominal and pelvic surgery were discharged home earlier with provision of support from a specialist gynaecology nurse. The results of this study suggest that duration of hospital stay can be shortened by the introduction of a specialist nurse without introducing any adverse physical and psychological effects. This process of care is associated with receipt of information on health and lifestyle issues and maintenance of high levels of patient satisfaction and demonstrates the effectiveness of the specialist nurse role in the provision of health information for women. Earlier hospital discharge at 48 h after major abdominal and pelvic surgery is an acceptable, cost effective alternative to current routine practice in the absence of further randomised evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530916     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

Review 1.  Postoperative management and restrictions for female pelvic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Miles Murphy; Cedric Olivera; Thomas Wheeler; Elizabeth Casiano; Nazema Siddiqui; Rajiv Gala; Tondalaya Gamble; Ethan M Balk; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes.

Authors:  Michelle Butler; Timothy J Schultz; Phil Halligan; Ann Sheridan; Leigh Kinsman; Thomas Rotter; Jonathan Beaumier; Robyn Gail Kelly; Jonathan Drennan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-23

3.  Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields-a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sarah Louise Elin Roberts; Andy Healey; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Interventions to Promote Early Discharge and Avoid Inappropriate Hospital (Re)Admission: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alice Coffey; Patricia Leahy-Warren; Eileen Savage; Josephine Hegarty; Nicola Cornally; Mary Rose Day; Laura Sahm; Kieran O'Connor; Jane O'Doherty; Aaron Liew; Duygu Sezgin; Rónán O'Caoimh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Reporting and Analysis of Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Authors:  Mohamed El Alili; Johanna M van Dongen; Judith A F Huirne; Maurits W van Tulder; Judith E Bosmans
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  An economic evaluation of a specialist preventive care clinician in a community mental health service: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Caitlin Fehily; Rod Ling; Andrew Searles; Kate Bartlem; John Wiggers; Rebecca Hodder; Andrew Wilson; Kim Colyvas; Jenny Bowman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.