Literature DB >> 16530819

Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration.

Mi-Ra Lee1, Byeong-Hoon Cho, Ho-Hyun Son, Chung-Moon Um, In-Bog Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to measure the cusp deflection by polymerization shrinkage during composite restoration for mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities in premolars, and to examine the influence of cavity dimension, C-factor and restoration method on the cusp deflection.
METHODS: Thirty extracted maxillary premolars of similar size were prepared with four different sizes of MOD cavity, and divided into six groups. The width and depth of the pulpal wall of the cavity were as follows: group 1: 1.5x1 mm, group 2: 1.5x2 mm, group 3: 3x1 mm, and groups 4-6: 3x2 mm. Groups 1-4 were restored using a bulk filling with a composite. Group 5 was restored incrementally, and group 6 was restored with an indirect composite inlay. Cusp deflections were measured using LVDT transducers. The cusp deflections were compared between groups using ANOVA and Scheffe tests, and a correlation analysis was done.
RESULTS: The cusp deflections of groups 1-4 were 12.1 (2.2), 17.2 (1.9), 16.2 (0.8) and 26.4 (4.2) microm, respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between the length cubed divided by the thickness cubed of the remaining cusp (L3/T3) and cusp deflection. The C-factor was related to the % flexure (100xcusp deflection/cavity width). The cusp deflections of groups 5 and 6 were 17.4 (2.0) and 17.9 (1.4) microm, respectively, which were much lower values than those of group 4. SIGNIFICANCE: The cusp deflection increased with increasing cavity dimension and C-factor. Use of an incremental filling technique or an indirect composite inlay restoration could reduce the cuspal strain.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530819     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  21 in total

1.  Shrinkage of dental composite in simulated cavity measured with digital image correlation.

Authors:  Jianying Li; Preetanjali Thakur; Alex S L Fok
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Polymerization shrinkage assessment of dental resin composites: a literature review.

Authors:  Dalia Kaisarly; Moataz El Gezawi
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Emel Karaman; Busra Keskin; Ugur Inan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effect of Different Composite Restorations on the Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored with Different Insertion Techniques- An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Sakshi Singhal; Anuraag Gurtu; Anurag Singhal; Rashmi Bansal; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

5.  Degree of conversion of nano-hybrid resin-based composites with novel and conventional matrix formulation.

Authors:  Karina E Frauscher; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Reduced shrinkage stress via photo-initiated copper(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition polymerizations of azide-alkyne resins.

Authors:  Han Byul Song; Nancy Sowan; Parag K Shah; Austin Baranek; Alexander Flores; Jeffrey W Stansbury; Christopher N Bowman
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Shrinkage Stresses Generated during Resin-Composite Applications: A Review.

Authors:  Luis Felipe J Schneider; Larissa Maria Cavalcante; Nick Silikas
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2009-09-30

8.  Fracture Strength and Marginal Adaptation of Conservative and Extended MOD Cavities Restored with Cention N.

Authors:  Maryam Firouzmandi; Ali Asghar Alavi; Dana Jafarpour; Soroush Sadatsharifee
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-07-06

9.  Posterior composite restoration update: focus on factors influencing form and function.

Authors:  Brenda S Bohaty; Qiang Ye; Anil Misra; Fabio Sene; Paulette Spencer
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2013-05-15

10.  Bond strengths of silorane- and methacrylate-based composites to various underlying materials.

Authors:  Sezin Ozer; Emine Sen Tunc; Nihan Gonulol
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.