Literature DB >> 16530638

MR imaging of the spine at 3T.

Marc D Shapiro1.   

Abstract

There are many advantages and challenges associated with 3T imaging of the spine. The increase in SNR allows for optimization of diagnostic quality and improved clinical efficiency. PI techniques merge well with high-field technology, which minimizes many of the challenges that are associated with 3T systems. The increase in chemical shift, pulsatile flow, and susceptibility artifact can be mediated with manipulation of imaging parameters. One major challenge that plagued 3T imaging of the spine was the decrease in fluid contrast that was associated with the lengthened T1 relaxation times. This has been resolved essentially for non-contrast spine imaging by using T1 FLAIR, which delineates soft tissue, CSF, disc, and bone interfaces exquisitely well. The optimal postcontrast T1 sequence may not exist yet. Clinical experience dictates that with a combination of T1 FLAIR with or without fat saturation (in one plane) and T1 FSE(in the other plane) no significant enhancing pathology will be missed. Despite the challenges, 3T imaging of the spine provides many improvements over 1.5T systems. These advances can be maximized by use of still evolving technologies and pulse sequence designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530638     DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2006.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am        ISSN: 1064-9689            Impact factor:   2.266


  11 in total

1.  Symptomatic nerve root changes on contrast-enhanced MR imaging after surgery for lumbar disk herniation.

Authors:  Y S Lee; E S Choi; C J Song
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  3 T magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; N Biccari; F Mangano; R Toffanin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Response assessment in medulloblastoma and leptomeningeal seeding tumors: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology committee.

Authors:  Katherine E Warren; Gilbert Vezina; Tina Y Poussaint; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger J Packer; Alba A Brandes; Moshe Reiss; Stewart Goldman; Michael J Fisher; Ian F Pollack; Michael D Prados; Patrick Y Wen; Susan M Chang; Christelle Dufour; David Zurakowski; Rolf D Kortmann; Mark W Kieran
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Advances in imaging of vertebral and spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Andrew L Goldberg; Sharif M Kershah
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  A prospective comparison study of fast T1 weighted fluid attenuation inversion recovery and T1 weighted turbo spin echo sequence at 3 T in degenerative disease of the cervical spine.

Authors:  K Ganesan; G M Bydder
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comment on "Response assessment in medulloblastoma and leptomeningeal seeding tumors: recommendations from the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Committee".

Authors:  Julie H Harreld
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  [Spinal tumors].

Authors:  F J Ahlhelm; P Fries; A Nabhan; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  A radiofrequency coil configuration for imaging the human vertebral column at 7 T.

Authors:  M Vossen; W Teeuwisse; M Reijnierse; C M Collins; N B Smith; A G Webb
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  A 7T spine array based on electric dipole transmitters.

Authors:  Qi Duan; Govind Nair; Natalia Gudino; Jacco A de Zwart; Peter van Gelderen; Joe Murphy-Boesch; Daniel S Reich; Jeff H Duyn; Hellmut Merkle
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Incidence of initial spinal metastasis in glioblastoma patients and the importance of spinal screening using MRI.

Authors:  Ichiyo Shibahara; Ryuta Saito; Yoshinari Osada; Masayuki Kanamori; Yukihiko Sonoda; Toshihiro Kumabe; Shunji Mugikura; Mika Watanabe; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.