Literature DB >> 16530384

Machine learning approaches for estimation of prediction interval for the model output.

Durga L Shrestha1, Dimitri P Solomatine.   

Abstract

A novel method for estimating prediction uncertainty using machine learning techniques is presented. Uncertainty is expressed in the form of the two quantiles (constituting the prediction interval) of the underlying distribution of prediction errors. The idea is to partition the input space into different zones or clusters having similar model errors using fuzzy c-means clustering. The prediction interval is constructed for each cluster on the basis of empirical distributions of the errors associated with all instances belonging to the cluster under consideration and propagated from each cluster to the examples according to their membership grades in each cluster. Then a regression model is built for in-sample data using computed prediction limits as targets, and finally, this model is applied to estimate the prediction intervals (limits) for out-of-sample data. The method was tested on artificial and real hydrologic data sets using various machine learning techniques. Preliminary results show that the method is superior to other methods estimating the prediction interval. A new method for evaluating performance for estimating prediction interval is proposed as well.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530384     DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Netw        ISSN: 0893-6080


  6 in total

1.  A fusion approach to improve accuracy and estimate uncertainty in cuffless blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Cederick Landry; Sean D Peterson; Arash Arami
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Forecasting influenza activity using self-adaptive AI model and multi-source data in Chongqing, China.

Authors:  Kun Su; Liang Xu; Guanqiao Li; Xiaowen Ruan; Xian Li; Pan Deng; Xinmi Li; Qin Li; Xianxian Chen; Yu Xiong; Shaofeng Lu; Li Qi; Chaobo Shen; Wenge Tang; Rong Rong; Boran Hong; Yi Ning; Dongyan Long; Jiaying Xu; Xuanling Shi; Zhihong Yang; Qi Zhang; Ziqi Zhuang; Linqi Zhang; Jing Xiao; Yafei Li
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 8.143

3.  Uncertainty quantification in the radiogenomics modeling of EGFR amplification in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Leland S Hu; Lujia Wang; Kristin R Swanson; Jing Li; Andrea Hawkins-Daarud; Jennifer M Eschbacher; Kyle W Singleton; Pamela R Jackson; Kamala Clark-Swanson; Christopher P Sereduk; Sen Peng; Panwen Wang; Junwen Wang; Leslie C Baxter; Kris A Smith; Gina L Mazza; Ashley M Stokes; Bernard R Bendok; Richard S Zimmerman; Chandan Krishna; Alyx B Porter; Maciej M Mrugala; Joseph M Hoxworth; Teresa Wu; Nhan L Tran
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Uncertainty Prediction for Machine Learning Models of Material Properties.

Authors:  Francesca Tavazza; Brian DeCost; Kamal Choudhary
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-11-23

5.  Taking account of uncertainties in digital land suitability assessment.

Authors:  Brendan P Malone; Darren B Kidd; Budiman Minasny; Alex B McBratney
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Contamination-controlled high-throughput whole genome sequencing for influenza A viruses using the MiSeq sequencer.

Authors:  Hong Kai Lee; Chun Kiat Lee; Julian Wei-Tze Tang; Tze Ping Loh; Evelyn Siew-Chuan Koay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.