Literature DB >> 16530302

An intranasal vaccine targeting both the Bacillus anthracis toxin and bacterium provides protection against aerosol spore challenge in rabbits.

S Wimer-Mackin1, M Hinchcliffe, C R Petrie, S J Warwood, W T Tino, M S Williams, J P Stenz, A Cheff, C Richardson.   

Abstract

An intranasal vaccine targeting the Bacillus anthracis toxin and vegetative bacterium was tested for the ability to protect immunized rabbits against aerosol B. anthracis spore exposure. Rabbits were vaccinated intranasally with PA-based vaccines formulated as dry powders with or without chitosan (ChiSys, Archimedes Development Limited), a compound that exhibits muco-adhesive properties, or as a liquid. Formulations also contained MPL adjuvant and PA. Some vaccines contained PA conjugated to a 10-mer peptide of the poly-d-glutamic acid capsule of B. anthracis. Rabbits were immunized on days 0 and 28 and aerosol challenged with an average 250LD50 Ames spores on day 85. Serum antibody was measured before and after challenge. Significant anti-PA serum IgG levels were obtained, particularly with use of ChiSys based formulations. PA-Conj induced significant anti-capsule responses, although a formulation containing free capsule peptide did not. All immunized rabbits survived the challenge, but differences in morbidity, as evidenced by anorexia, between vaccine groups were observed. Only rabbits immunized with PA+PA-Conj appeared normal throughout the post-challenge observation period (14 days), while all that received PA with the free capsule peptide appeared ill at times as evidenced by a failure to eat normally. One negative control rabbit received a lower inhaled spore dose (183LD50) and survived the challenge, although it was anorexic post-challenge. It also had a high level of anti-LF antibodies in its convalescent serum (5400 U/ml), indicating an extensive infection. In contrast, 75% of the immunized rabbits had no LF-specific antibody in their post-challenge sera, and the rest had low levels (< or = 138 U/ml), indicating that infections resulting in toxin production were avoided or greatly reduced. Thus, intranasal immunization with a chitosan-based powder vaccine combining PA and capsule epitopes provided superior protection against B. anthracis infection compared to a single antigen (PA) vaccine, as evidenced by a reduction in morbidity and prevention of death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16530302     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  12 in total

1.  Effective induction of protective systemic immunity with nasally administered vaccines adjuvanted with IL-1.

Authors:  William M Gwinn; Shaun M Kirwan; Sheena H Wang; Kathleen A Ashcraft; Neil L Sparks; Catherine R Doil; Tom G Tlusty; Leslie S Casey; Susan K Hollingshead; David E Briles; Richard S Dondero; Anthony J Hickey; W Michael Foster; Herman F Staats
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  Intranasal immunization with dry powder vaccines.

Authors:  Tania F Bahamondez-Canas; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.571

3.  Intranasal delivery of Norwalk virus-like particles formulated in an in situ gelling, dry powder vaccine.

Authors:  Lissette S Velasquez; Samantha Shira; Alice N Berta; Jacquelyn Kilbourne; Babu M Medi; Ian Tizard; Yawei Ni; Charles J Arntzen; Melissa M Herbst-Kralovetz
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Identification of novel and cross-species seroreactive proteins from Bacillus anthracis using a ligation-independent cloning-based, SOS-inducible expression system.

Authors:  Brian D McWilliams; Timothy Palzkill; George M Weinstock; Joseph F Petrosino
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Intranasal P particle vaccine provided partial cross-variant protection against human GII.4 norovirus diarrhea in gnotobiotic pigs.

Authors:  Jacob Kocher; Tammy Bui; Ernawati Giri-Rachman; Ke Wen; Guohua Li; Xingdong Yang; Fangning Liu; Ming Tan; Ming Xia; Weiming Zhong; Xi Jiang; Lijuan Yuan
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  A single immunization with a dry powder anthrax vaccine protects rabbits against lethal aerosol challenge.

Authors:  S D Klas; C R Petrie; S J Warwood; M S Williams; C L Olds; J P Stenz; A M Cheff; M Hinchcliffe; C Richardson; S Wimer
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  In vitro and in vivo characterization of anthrax anti-protective antigen and anti-lethal factor monoclonal antibodies after passive transfer in a mouse lethal toxin challenge model to define correlates of immunity.

Authors:  Herman F Staats; S Munir Alam; Richard M Scearce; Shaun M Kirwan; Julia Xianzhi Zhang; William M Gwinn; Barton F Haynes
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Intranasal immunization with aluminum salt-adjuvanted dry powder vaccine.

Authors:  Sachin G Thakkar; Zachary N Warnken; Riyad F Alzhrani; Solange A Valdes; Abdulaziz M Aldayel; Haiyue Xu; Robert O Williams; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Mucosal immunization with a novel nanoemulsion-based recombinant anthrax protective antigen vaccine protects against Bacillus anthracis spore challenge.

Authors:  Anna U Bielinska; Katarzyna W Janczak; Jeffrey J Landers; Paul Makidon; Laurie E Sower; Johnny W Peterson; James R Baker
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Killed but metabolically active Bacillus anthracis vaccines induce broad and protective immunity against anthrax.

Authors:  Justin Skoble; John W Beaber; Yi Gao; Julie A Lovchik; Laurie E Sower; Weiqun Liu; William Luckett; Johnny W Peterson; Richard Calendar; Daniel A Portnoy; C Rick Lyons; Thomas W Dubensky
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.