Literature DB >> 16529156

Effects of Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 as probiotic supplement on intestinal transport and barrier function of piglets.

Ulrike Lodemann1, Katrin Hübener, Nicole Jansen, Holger Martens.   

Abstract

Many studies report positive effects of probiotic supplementation on the performance and health of piglets. The intention of this study was to describe the effects of Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 on the transport and barrier functions of pig small intestine to improve our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of this probiotic. Ussing chamber studies were conducted with isolated jejunal epithelia of piglets at the age of 14, 28, 35 and 56 days. Jejunal tissues of the control group were compared with epithelia of piglets that had received a diet supplemented with the probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415. Transport properties (absorption and secretion) of the epithelia were examined by mucosal addition of glucose or L-glutamine or by serosal addition of PGE2. Electrophysiology of the epithelia was continuously recorded and the change in short circuit current (Isc) was determined. Paracellular permeability was measured by measuring the flux rates of mannitol. The increase of Isc caused by mucosal addition of glucose was, at all glucose concentrations, higher in the probiotic group compared with the control group. However, the difference (up to 100% of the control) was not significant. The increase of Isc after the mucosal addition of L-glutamine (12mmol/l) was higher in the tissues of the probiotic group but did not reach significance. Serosal PGE2 induced a significantly higher increase of Isc in tissues of the probiotic group at the age of 28 days. No consistent differences were observed in mannitol transport rates between the feeding groups. Significant age-dependent alterations of absorptive and secretory properties of the jejunal epithelium were observed; these were independent of the treatment. A probiotic supplementation seems to influence transport properties of small intestine epithelium. The increased absorption of glucose could be interpreted as a positive effect for the animal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16529156     DOI: 10.1080/17450390500468099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr        ISSN: 1477-2817            Impact factor:   2.242


  12 in total

1.  Antimicrobial peptides targeting Gram-negative pathogens, produced and delivered by lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Katherine Volzing; Juan Borrero; Michael J Sadowsky; Yiannis N Kaznessis
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.110

2.  Whole genome sequence analyses-based assessment of virulence potential and antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from commercial swine and cattle probiotic products.

Authors:  Pragathi B Shridhar; Raghavendra G Amachawadi; Mike Tokach; Isha Patel; Jayanthi Gangiredla; Mark Mammel; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Influence of a probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecium on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 infection in a porcine animal infection model.

Authors:  István Szabó; Lothar H Wieler; Karsten Tedin; Lydia Scharek-Tedin; David Taras; Andreas Hensel; Bernd Appel; Karsten Nöckler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Influence of differently processed yeast (Kluyveromyces fragilis) on feed intake and gut physiology in weaned pigs.

Authors:  B Keimer; S Kröger; I Röhe; R Pieper; A Simon; J Zentek
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Measures Matter-Determining the True Nutri-Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine.

Authors:  Gerald C Shurson; Yuan-Tai Hung; Jae Cheol Jang; Pedro E Urriola
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Effects of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecium and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains in a Pig and Human Epithelial Intestinal Cell Model.

Authors:  Ulrike Lodemann; Julia Strahlendorf; Peter Schierack; Shanti Klingspor; Jörg R Aschenbach; Holger Martens
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2015-03-26

Review 7.  Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and probiotics in swine: what the bleep do we know?

Authors:  Jean Daniel Dubreuil
Journal:  Biosci Microbiota Food Health       Date:  2017-04-29

8.  Pretreatment with probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 11181 ameliorates necrotic enteritis-induced intestinal barrier injury in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wu; Wenrui Zhen; Yanqiang Geng; Zhong Wang; Yuming Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Metabolites produced by probiotic Lactobacilli rapidly increase glucose uptake by Caco-2 cells.

Authors:  Arun K Rooj; Yasuhiro Kimura; Randal K Buddington
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on diets supplemented with a synbiotic containing Enterococcus faecium and oligosaccharides.

Authors:  Wageha Awad; Khaled Ghareeb; Josef Böhm
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.