OBJECTIVE: A prospective space-time scan statistic was applied to Chicago's 2002 shigellosis surveillance data to evaluate its utility in objectively describing clusters and assisting in the prioritization of investigations. METHODS: The prospective space-time module of SaTScan, a free software available online, was used to identify "live" clusters of disease, meaning cases that were current as of the date of the analysis and strongly associated in place and time. Fifty-two separate space-time analyses were run; one simulation for each week of 2002. Identified clusters were described in terms of space, time, risk factors reported by involved case-patients, and cases' links to venue-associated outbreaks. RESULTS: Twelve live clusters were detected at the p < 0.05 significance level: two single-household clusters and 10 community clusters. The community clusters ranged in size from 194 to 367 census tracts (median = 294), and in disease burden from 21 to 41 cases (median = 29). Geographically, all of the community clusters were located in the west-central part of the city and had a temporal span of 28 days. Within the 10 community clusters, 15 different day care centers were identified as potential exposure settings for case-patients or their close contacts. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective space-time scan statistic offers local health departments an objective way of describing clusters of shigellosis cases. The method used in this study could help prioritize the assignment and investigation of cases, particularly when overall shigellosis incidence exceeds expected numbers or when an agency's resources are stressed by other events, such as outbreaks.
OBJECTIVE: A prospective space-time scan statistic was applied to Chicago's 2002 shigellosis surveillance data to evaluate its utility in objectively describing clusters and assisting in the prioritization of investigations. METHODS: The prospective space-time module of SaTScan, a free software available online, was used to identify "live" clusters of disease, meaning cases that were current as of the date of the analysis and strongly associated in place and time. Fifty-two separate space-time analyses were run; one simulation for each week of 2002. Identified clusters were described in terms of space, time, risk factors reported by involved case-patients, and cases' links to venue-associated outbreaks. RESULTS: Twelve live clusters were detected at the p < 0.05 significance level: two single-household clusters and 10 community clusters. The community clusters ranged in size from 194 to 367 census tracts (median = 294), and in disease burden from 21 to 41 cases (median = 29). Geographically, all of the community clusters were located in the west-central part of the city and had a temporal span of 28 days. Within the 10 community clusters, 15 different day care centers were identified as potential exposure settings for case-patients or their close contacts. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective space-time scan statistic offers local health departments an objective way of describing clusters of shigellosis cases. The method used in this study could help prioritize the assignment and investigation of cases, particularly when overall shigellosis incidence exceeds expected numbers or when an agency's resources are stressed by other events, such as outbreaks.
Authors: J Sobel; D N Cameron; J Ismail; N Strockbine; M Williams; P S Diaz; B Westley; M Rittmann; J DiCristina; H Ragazzoni; R V Tauxe; E D Mintz Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Daniel R O'Leary; Anthony A Marfin; Susan P Montgomery; Aaron M Kipp; Jennifer A Lehman; Brad J Biggerstaff; Veronica L Elko; Peggy D Collins; John E Jones; Grant L Campbell Journal: Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis Date: 2004 Impact factor: 2.133
Authors: P S Mead; L Slutsker; V Dietz; L F McCaig; J S Bresee; C Shapiro; P M Griffin; R V Tauxe Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 1999 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Sharon K Greene; Jie Huang; Allyson M Abrams; Debra Gilliss; Mary Reed; Richard Platt; Susan S Huang; Martin Kulldorff Journal: Foodborne Pathog Dis Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 3.171
Authors: R Pijnacker; L Mughini-Gras; H Vennema; R Enserink; C C VAN DEN Wijngaard; T Kortbeek; W VAN Pelt Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Boris Kauhl; Jeanne Heil; Christian J P A Hoebe; Jürgen Schweikart; Thomas Krafft; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 3.240