Literature DB >> 16528506

[The model project "newborn auditory screening" in the Upper Palatinate: high process and result quality of an interdisciplinary concept].

U Nennstiel-Ratzel1, S Arenz, R von Kries, M Wildner, J Strutz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In May 2003, a newborn auditory screening program was initiated in the Upper Palatinate.
METHODS: Sequential OAE- and BERA-screening was conducted in all hospitals with obstetric facilities. The Screening Center at the Public Health Authority was responsible for the coordination of the screening process, completeness of participation, the follow-up of all subjects with a positive screening test and the quality of instrumental screening.
RESULTS: A total of 96% of 17,469 newborns were screened. The referral rate at discharge was 1.6% (0.4% for bilateral positive findings). For 97% of the positive screening results, a definite diagnosis to confirm or exclude hearing loss was achieved; for 43% only after intervention by the Screening Center. Fifteen children with profound bilateral hearing impairment were identified of whom eight were only detected by the intervention of the Screening Center.
CONCLUSION: The effective structures established in the Upper Palatinate provide a standard for the quality of neonatal auditory screening achievable in Germany.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16528506     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-006-1383-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  12 in total

Review 1.  Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice.

Authors:  C Kennedy; D McCann
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Universal newborn screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment: an 8-year follow-up of a controlled trial.

Authors:  Colin Kennedy; Donna McCann; Michael J Campbell; Lindsay Kimm; Roger Thornton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Aug 20-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence.

Authors:  D C Thompson; H McPhillips; R L Davis; T L Lieu; C J Homer; M Helfand
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 Oct 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  [Neonatal hearing screening with the Echosensor automated device for otoacoustic emissions. A comparative study].

Authors:  G Reuter; F Bördgen; F Dressler; S Schäfer; I Hemmanouil; R Schönweiler; T Lenarz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Comparison of costs and referral rates of 3 universal newborn hearing screening protocols.

Authors:  B R Vohr; W Oh; E J Stewart; J D Bentkover; S Gabbard; J Lemons; L A Papile; R Pye
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing.

Authors:  M P Moeller
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss.

Authors:  C Yoshinaga-Itano; A L Sedey; D K Coulter; A L Mehl
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  From Screening to Early Identification and Intervention: Discovering Predictors to Successful Outcomes for Children With Significant Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Christine Yoshinaga-Itano
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2003

9.  Effectiveness of a TEOAE-based screening program. Can a patient-tracking system effectively be organized using modern information technology and central data management?

Authors:  W Delb; D Merkel; K Pilorget; J Schmitt; P K Plinkert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  [New challenges to the Screening Center in the Bavarian State office for Health Care and Safe Quality of Foods].

Authors:  U Nennstiel-Ratzel; S Arenz; M Wildner; R V Kries; B Liebl
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2004-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project. Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (part II).

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Thomas Wiesner; Holger Drews; Frank Müller; Achim Breitfuss; Regina Schiller; Markus Hess
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  Universal newborn hearing screening, a revolutionary diagnosis of deafness: real benefits and limitations.

Authors:  George X Papacharalampous; Thomas P Nikolopoulos; Dimitrios I Davilis; Ioannis E Xenellis; Stavros G Korres
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  [Newborn hearing impairment. Epidemiology and therapeutic relevance].

Authors:  G Reuter; C Krauth; T Lenarz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Using an employee survey as a means of quality assurance in newborn hearing screening].

Authors:  A Depenbrock; P Matulat; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Early detection of hearing loss.

Authors:  Götz Schade
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.