Literature DB >> 16527715

The value of virtual reality-simulator training in the development of laparoscopic surgical skills.

Roger Hart1, Dorota A Doherty, Krishnan Karthigasu, Raymond Garry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) training in improving the surgical skills of medical students and gynecologic trainees.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study to assess the changes observed in objectively measured surgical performance after VR training. SETTING AND POPULATION: University teaching hospital and the laboratories of the University of Western Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen 5th-year medical students, six junior-doctor trainees (years 1-3), and eight senior trainees (years 4-6).
INTERVENTIONS: Standard gynecologic procedures before and after VR training were undertaken on sheep. The procedures were video-recorded and edited to blind the scorer as to identity and seniority of the operator. The procedures were scored using a combination of operative time and penalties for surgical errors. The surgical scores were correlated with the VR scores.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Operative skills were assessed using a combination score compiled from scores obtained while undertaking salpingectomy, salpingotomy, and tubal clipping. Virtual reality scores were also a combination score derived from summation of various computer-calculated measures of time and accuracy in undertaking two standardized exercises. RESULTS: The baseline VR scores were significantly related to the overall pre-training scores (salpingectomy p = .032). A better initial VR score was also predictive of better surgical performance. The initial VR score was also predictive of improvement observed between baseline and post-training (p = .004).
CONCLUSION: Virtual reality training is of value in improving surgical skills in the clinical environment. It appears to be of most value in the earliest stages of training. These data suggest that serious consideration should be given to incorporating VR training into the training program of obstetricians and gynecologists at an early stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16527715     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  7 in total

Review 1.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Evaluation of a new virtual-reality training simulator for hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Michael Bajka; Stefan Tuchschmid; Matthias Streich; Daniel Fink; Gábor Székely; Matthias Harders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A surgical virtual reality simulator distinguishes between expert gynecologic laparoscopic surgeons and perinatologists.

Authors:  Fariba Mohtashami; Peter von Dadelszen; Catherine Allaire
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Effect of structural training on surgical outcomes of residents' first operative laparoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ewa Jokinen; Tomi S Mikkola; Päivi Härkki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  How, for Whom, and in Which Contexts or Conditions Augmented and Virtual Reality Training Works in Upskilling Health Care Workers: Realist Synthesis.

Authors:  Norina Gasteiger; Sabine N van der Veer; Paul Wilson; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.143

7.  Realhand high dexterity instruments for the treatment of stage I uterine malignancy.

Authors:  Mark A Rettenmaier; Katrina Lopez; Cheri L Graham; John V Brown; Cameron R John; John P Micha; Bram H Goldstein
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.