Literature DB >> 16527711

Development and validation of a home-based, mirrored, gynecologic laparoscopy trainer.

James K Robinson1, David M Kushner.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the usefulness of a home-based laparoscopy practice tool in terms of skills acquisition and practice pattern.
DESIGN: Six mirrored laparoscopy trainers were designed and built. Participants were enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial and performed a series of skills with a video-endoscopic training tower and laparoscopic training box in timed pre- and post-tests over 5 weeks. Control and experimental cohorts practiced skills tests in different settings with different equipment. Data analysis used the t test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Analysis of variance/analysis of covariance models were used for independent variables. (Canadian Task Force classification I.)
SETTING: Midwestern tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Third-year medical students rotating through their obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.
INTERVENTIONS: Control cohort participants (n = 13) practiced the skills in the video-endoscopic laboratory while the experimental cohort (n = 13) received mirrored training boxes and practiced at home.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated significant improvement, with a trend favoring the control group (p = .08). Randomization group and number of practice sessions were significant variables favoring the control group and experimental group, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Home-based practice on a mirrored laparoscopy trainer improves hand-eye coordination in inexperienced surgeons and results in more frequent practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16527711     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  5 in total

Review 1.  Off-site training of laparoscopic skills, a scoping review using a thematic analysis.

Authors:  Ebbe Thinggaard; Jakob Kleif; Flemming Bjerrum; Jeanett Strandbygaard; Ismail Gögenur; E Matthew Ritter; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A laparoscopic simulator - maybe it is worth making it yourself.

Authors:  Dominik A Walczak; Piotr Piotrowski; Adam Jędrzejczyk; Dariusz Pawełczak; Zbigniew Pasieka
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 3.  A systematic review of low-cost laparoscopic simulators.

Authors:  Mimi M Li; Joseph George
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Simulation-based training in laparoscopic urology - Pros and cons.

Authors:  Abhishek Gajendra Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

5.  Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT).

Authors:  Domenico Soriero; Giulia Atzori; Fabio Barra; Davide Pertile; Andrea Massobrio; Luigi Conti; Dario Gusmini; Lorenzo Epis; Maurizio Gallo; Filippo Banchini; Patrizio Capelli; Veronica Penza; Stefano Scabini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.