Literature DB >> 16527679

Lions Clubs International Foundation Core Four Photoscreening: results from 17 programs and 400,000 preschool children.

Sean P Donahue1, John D Baker, William E Scott, Paul Rychwalski, Daniel E Neely, Patrick Tong, Donald Bergsma, Deborah Lenahan, Dawn Rush, Ken Heinlein, Ron Walkenbach, Tammy M Johnson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Photoscreening programs for preschool vision screening have been promoted by Lions Clubs International Foundation (LCIF) via their 17 Core Four grant project awards since 1999. Results from 15 Core Four grant programs in the United States and one in Taiwan are presented here.
METHODS: Photoscreening was modeled after the Tennessee program and instituted statewide in each area. Programs were given latitude with respect to screening instrument and referral criteria, but a partnering academic institution and medical director were expected. Preschool children were screened by volunteers; referred children were examined by community optometrists and ophthalmologists who returned results to each program's coordinating center. Outcome data included number of children screened, referral rate, follow-up rate, and positive predictive value, which was generally determined using AAPOS-defined vision screening criteria.
RESULTS: All but one program used the MTI photoscreener (it chose not to participate); photoscreening referral criteria were standard for 13 programs. Through December 2004, more than 400,000 preschool children had been screened. The referral rate for programs using the MTI photoscreener averaged 5.2% (range, 3.7-12.6%). The predictive value of a positive photoscreen was 80%. Overall, 54% of referred children received follow-up examinations. Follow-up rate was the largest variable: 4 programs, screening nearly 250,000 children, had follow-up rates 70% or greater; 10 programs had follow-up data from fewer than 40% of referred children.
CONCLUSIONS: Volunteer-led photoscreening programs can be instituted in other locations, including overseas, with high levels of effectiveness. Limitations include the possibility of poor success and variable attention to follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16527679     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  12 in total

1.  Vision screening in infants, children and youth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  The prevalence of amblyopia in Germany: data from the prospective, population-based Gutenberg Health Study.

Authors:  Heike M Elflein; Susanne Fresenius; Julia Lamparter; Susanne Pitz; Norbert Pfeiffer; Harald Binder; Philipp Wild; Alireza Mirshahi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Early Childhood Vision Screening in Hawai'i Utilizing a Hand-Held Screener.

Authors:  Duane A Chang; Roger C Ede; Dominic C Chow; Ryan D Souza; Louie Mar A Gangcuangco; Nancy Hanks; Beau K Nakamoto; Brooks Mitchell; Alison T Masutani; Sam Fisk; Cecilia M Shikuma; Jan E Dill
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2015-09

4.  The accuracy of photoscreening at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Tammy Yanovitch; David K Wallace; Sharon F Freedman; Laura B Enyedi; Priya Kishnani; Gordon Worley; Blythe Crissman; Erica Burner; Terri L Young
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Receding and disparity cues aid relaxation of accommodation.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Testability of the Retinomax autorefractor and IOLMaster in preschool children: the Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  Mark Borchert; Ying Wang; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Susan Cotter; Jennifer Deneen; Stanley Azen; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review.

Authors:  Irene Sanchez; Sara Ortiz-Toquero; Raul Martin; Victoria de Juan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-22

8.  Refractive error of Saudi children enrolled in primary school and kindergarten measured with a spot screener.

Authors:  Ziaul Haq Yasir; Nada Almadhi; Salma Tarabzouni; Abdulrahman Alhommadi; Rajiv Khandekar
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 May-Aug

9.  Evaluation of 'vision screening' program for three to six-year-old children in the Republic of Iran.

Authors:  Rajiv Khandekar; Noa Parast; Ashraf Arabi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Implementation of a vision-screening program in rural northeastern United States.

Authors:  Edmund Tsui; Andrew N Siedlecki; Jie Deng; Margaret C Pollard; Sandolsam Cha; Susan M Pepin; Erin M Salcone
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.