Literature DB >> 16527432

Measuring social structure: a comparison of eight dominance indices.

Karen L Bayly1, Christopher S Evans, Alan Taylor.   

Abstract

Measurement of social status is an important component of many behavioural studies. A variety of techniques have been developed and adopted, but while there have been some analyses of index properties using simulated data, the rationale for selecting a method remains poorly documented. As a first step in exploring the implications of index choice, we compared the characteristics of eight popular indices by applying each to the same data set from interactions between male fowl Gallus gallus, the system in which social hierarchies were first described. Data from eight social groups, observed over four successive breeding seasons, were analysed to determine whether different indices produced consistent dominance scores. These scores were then used in tests of the relation between social status and crowing to explore whether index choice affected the results obtained. We also examined the pattern of dominance index use over the last decade to infer whether this has likely been influenced by tradition, or by taxa of study animal. Overall agreement among methods was good when groups of birds had perfectly linear hierarchies, but results diverged when social structure was more complex, with either intransitive triads or reversals. While all regression analyses revealed a positive relationship between dominance and vocal behaviour, there were substantial differences in the amount of variance accounted for, even though the original data were identical in every case. Index selection can hence perturb estimates of the importance of dominance, relative to other factors. We also found that several methods have been adopted only by particular research teams, while the use of others has been taxonomically constrained, patterns implying that indices have not always been chosen solely upon their merits. Taken together, our results read as a cautionary tale. We suggest that selection of a dominance index requires careful consideration both of algorithm properties and of the factors affecting social status in the system of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16527432     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  10 in total

1.  Context-dependent hierarchies in pigeons.

Authors:  Máté Nagy; Gábor Vásárhelyi; Benjamin Pettit; Isabella Roberts-Mariani; Tamás Vicsek; Dora Biro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Concede or clash? Solitary sharks competing for food assess rivals to decide.

Authors:  Pierpaolo F Brena; Johann Mourier; Serge Planes; Eric E Clua
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Aggression, rank and power: why hens (and other animals) do not always peck according to their strength.

Authors:  Rebecca J Lewis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Early play may predict later dominance relationships in yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris).

Authors:  Daniel T Blumstein; Lawrance K Chung; Jennifer E Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The highest-ranking rooster has priority to announce the break of dawn.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Shimmura; Shosei Ohashi; Takashi Yoshimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Whom to groom and for what? Patterns of grooming in female Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus).

Authors:  Veronika Roubová; Martina Konečná; Petr Šmilauer; Bernard Wallner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Chimpanzee females queue but males compete for social status.

Authors:  Steffen Foerster; Mathias Franz; Carson M Murray; Ian C Gilby; Joseph T Feldblum; Kara K Walker; Anne E Pusey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Measuring dominance certainty and assessing its impact on individual and societal health in a nonhuman primate model: a network approach.

Authors:  Brenda McCowan; Jessica Vandeleest; Krishna Balasubramaniam; Fushing Hsieh; Amy Nathman; Brianne Beisner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  The prospect of rising in rank is key to long-term stability in Tibetan macaque society.

Authors:  Lixing Sun; Dong-Po Xia; Shine Sun; Lori K Sheeran; Jin-Hua Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparative Investigations of Social Context-Dependent Dominance in Captive Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and Wild Tibetan Macaques (Macaca thibetana).

Authors:  Jake A Funkhouser; Jessica A Mayhew; Lori K Sheeran; John B Mulcahy; Jin-Hua Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.