Literature DB >> 16527017

Fat graft myringoplasty: results of a long-term follow-up.

Roee Landsberg1, Gadi Fishman, Ari DeRowe, Eli Berco, Gilead Berger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term results of fat graft myringoplasty in adult and pediatric populations.
DESIGN: Prospective case series study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients with chronic tympanic membrane perforations were considered candidates for fat graft myringoplasty. Excluded were patients with purulent discharge, suspected ossicular disease, suspected cholesteatoma, or a perforation diameter greater than 6.5 mm. Fat was harvested from the ear lobule or subcutaneous tissue just posterior-inferior to the lobule.
RESULTS: The study population comprised 27 adults and 11 children. Twenty-eight perforations were small (73.7%) and 10 were large (26.3%). Altogether, 31 of 38 perforations were successfully repaired (81.6%), including 22 of 28 small perforations (78.6%) and 9 of 10 large perforations (90%). Assessment by age showed that 23 of 27 perforations of the adults (85.2%) and 8 of 11 perforations of the children (72.7%) successfully closed (p = .648). Follow-up ranged from 25 to 53 months (mean 40.6 +/- 8.3 months). No recurrence of the perforation during the follow-up period was recorded if the initial results were successful. The speech reception threshold improved significantly (18.5 +/- 7.7 dB vs 23.5 +/- 8 dB; p = .043). No significant sensorineural hearing loss occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Fat graft myringoplasty is a reliable technique for the closure of small- and medium-sized perforations. The grafting results showed excellent long-term durability. Given the simplicity of the technique, its short duration, and the favourable hearing results, fat graft myringoplasty should be considered the procedure of choice in patients with suitable perforations and when not otherwise contraindicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16527017     DOI: 10.2310/7070.2005.4124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0381-6605


  8 in total

1.  In response to: Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty vs. fat patch fat graft myringoplasty.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A Comparative Study of Various Office Procedures for the Management of Small to Medium Size Tympanic Membrane Perforations.

Authors:  Ashish Mourya; Leena Jain; Shalini Jadia; Sadat Qureshi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-04-19

3.  Minimyringoplasty: repair of small central perforation of tympanic membrane by fat graft: a prospective study.

Authors:  Monoj Mukherjee; Ranjan Paul
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-02-25

4.  The Long-Term Stability of Fat-Graft Myringoplasty in the Closure of Tympanic Membrane Perforations and Hearing Restoration.

Authors:  Jae Sang Han; Jung Ju Han; Jung Mee Park; Jae-Hyun Seo; Kyoung Ho Park
Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Novel Use of Platelet Rich Fibrin Membrane in Transcanal Myringoplasty: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Anirudh Shukla; Yogesh Singh Kaurav; Richa Vatsyayan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-08

6.  Fat graft myringoplasty after unsuccessful tympanic membrane repair.

Authors:  Francesco Fiorino; Franco Barbieri
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 3.236

7.  Comparison of Grafting Success Rate and Hearing Outcomes between Primary and Revision Tympanoplasties.

Authors:  Mohammad Faramarzi; Mahmood Shishegar; Saeed Reza Tofighi; Hadi Sharouny; Raman Rajagopalan
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-01

8.  Hyaluronic acid fat graft myringoplasty: how we do it.

Authors:  I Saliba
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.597

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.