Literature DB >> 16526928

Outcomes in pharyngoplasty: a 10-year experience.

Landon S Pryor1, James Lehman, Michael G Parker, Anna Schmidt, Lynn Fox, Ananth S Murthy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The outcomes of 61 patients who underwent a pharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency were reviewed to determine potential risk factors for reoperation.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review of 61 consecutive patients over approximately 10 years (1993 to 2003). Variables analyzed included gender, cleft type, age at the time of pharyngoplasty, length of time between palate repair and pharyngoplasty, and associated syndromes. PARTICIPANTS: Of the 61 patients, 20 (34%) had a unilateral cleft lip and palate, 5 (8%) had a bilateral cleft lip and palate, 13 (21%) had an isolated cleft palate, 7 (11%) had a submucous cleft palate, and 16 (26%) were diagnosed with noncleft velopharyngeal insufficiency.
RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 10 (16%) required surgical revision. No statistically significant difference was found among gender, cleft type, age at the time of pharyngoplasty, the length of time between palate repair and pharyngoplasty, and associated congenital syndromes, with respect to the need for surgical revision (p > .05). Of the surgical revisions, 50% (5) were performed for a pharyngoplasty that was placed too low.
CONCLUSIONS: Because 50% of the pharyngoplasty revisions had evidence of poor velopharyngeal closure and associated hypernasality resulting from low placement of the sphincter, the pharyngoplasty needs to be placed at a high level to reduce the risk for revisional surgery. The pharyngoplasty is a good operation for velopharyngeal insufficiency with an overall success rate of 84% (51 of 61) after one operation and greater than 98% (60 of 61) after two operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16526928     DOI: 10.1597/04-115.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  4 in total

Review 1.  In search of the optimal surgical treatment for velopharyngeal dysfunction in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole E Spruijt; Judith Reijmanhinze; Greet Hens; Vincent Vander Poorten; Aebele B Mink van der Molen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Inspiration After Posterior Pharyngeal Flap Palatoplasty: A Preliminary Study Using Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis.

Authors:  Chao Yang; Jiang Li; Huo Li; Nan Chen; Xing Yin; Bing Shi; Jingtao Li; Hanyao Huang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 3.  Speech-Language Disorders in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: Best Practices for Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Cynthia B Solot; Debbie Sell; Anne Mayne; Adriane L Baylis; Christina Persson; Oksana Jackson; Donna M McDonald-McGinn
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Treatment of VPI with Customized Pharyngeal Flaps: One Size Does Not Fit All.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Boudiab; Emanuela C Peshel; Yousef Ibrahim; Rohun Gupta; Kongkrit Chaiyasate; Kenneth Shaheen; Matthew Rontal; Prasad Thottam; Pablo Antonio Ysunza
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-04-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.