Literature DB >> 16526498

Warning displays in spiny animals: one (more) evolutionary route to aposematism.

Michael P Speed1, Graeme D Ruxton.   

Abstract

To date, theoretical or laboratory simulations of aposematic evolution in prey animals have focused narrowly on internally stored chemical defense as the source of unprofitability and ignore aposematic advertisement of physical defenses such as spines (and defensive hairs, claws, etc.). This has occurred even though aposematism in spiny animals has been recognized since the 19th century. In this paper we present the first detailed theoretical consideration of aposematism in spiny animals, focusing on questions of initial evolution, costs of display, and coevolution of displays with defenses. Using an individual-based evolutionary model, we found that spines (or similar physical defenses) can easily evolve without aposematism, but when spines do evolve, aposematic displays can also easily evolve if they help to make the prey animal distinctive and if they draw attention to the physical threat. When aposematic displays evolve, they cause reduced investment in costly spines, so that, in addition to signaling unprofitability, aposematic display may enhance the cost-effectiveness of antipredator defenses (one exception to this conclusion is if the display is itself as costly as the defense). For animals with stinging spines, combining physical and chemical defense, the evolution of aposematic display may lead to reduced investment in the toxin compared to the spine. This occurs because spines act as both secondary (repellent) defenses and as primary defenses (their own visible, honest advertisement), whereas internally stored toxins only (generally) act as repellent secondary defenses. We argue that conspicuous aposematism in spines functions as an attention-getting mechanism, whereas conspicuous aposematic display in purely toxic animals may be explained by signal reliability arguments. Finally, one (more) route by which aposematism may initially evolve is by spiny rather than purely chemically defended species, spreading to species with other forms of secondary defense as the signal becomes common.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16526498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

1.  A mechanism for diversity in warning signals: conspicuousness versus toxicity in poison frogs.

Authors:  Catherine R Darst; Molly E Cummings; David C Cannatella
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Contrasting coloration in terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Tim Caro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The potential anti-herbivory role of microorganisms on plant thorns.

Authors:  Malka Halpern; Dina Raats; Simcha Lev-Yadun
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2007-11

4.  Müllerian mimicry in aposematic spiny plants.

Authors:  Simcha Lev-Yadun
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-06-24

5.  Unripe red fruits may be aposematic.

Authors:  Simcha Lev-Yadun; Gidi Ne'eman; Ido Izhaki
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-09-21

6.  Costs and benefits of plant allelochemicals in herbivore diet in a multi enemy world.

Authors:  J H Reudler; C Lindstedt; H Pakkanen; I Lehtinen; J Mappes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Aposematic coloration from Mid-Cretaceous Kachin amber.

Authors:  Chunpeng Xu; Cihang Luo; Edmund A Jarzembowski; Yan Fang; Bo Wang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Structure and possible functions of constant-frequency calls in Ariopsis seemanni (Osteichthyes, Ariidae).

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Jochen Schulz; Jörg Hartung; Karl-Heinz Esser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Warning displays may function as honest signals of toxicity.

Authors:  Jonathan D Blount; Michael P Speed; Graeme D Ruxton; Philip A Stephens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Explaining the evolution of warning coloration: secreted secondary defence chemicals may facilitate the evolution of visual aposematic signals.

Authors:  Jostein Gohli; Göran Högstedt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.