Literature DB >> 16525843

Risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of patients treated with sulfonylureas and metformin.

J M M Evans1, S A Ogston, A Emslie-Smith, A D Morris.   

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes newly treated with sulfonylureas and metformin. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) diabetes information system and the Medicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO) dispensed prescribing database for the population of Tayside, Scotland (400,000 people) were employed. Patients newly prescribed with oral hypoglycaemic agents between 1994 and 2001 were classified into five study cohorts according to the treatment received: metformin only, sulfonylureas only, sulfonylureas added to metformin, metformin added to sulfonylureas, and both drugs simultaneously. In Cox regression analyses, we estimated relative risks for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular hospital admission for patients in the five study cohorts, with metformin monotherapy as the reference group.
RESULTS: Of the 5,730 study patients, 1,000 died during a maximum of 8 years follow-up. Patients in the sulfonylureas only cohort had increased risks of mortality and cardiovascular mortality, with unadjusted relative risks of 3.12 (95% CI 2.54-3.84) and 3.71 (95% CI 2.64-5.22), respectively. After adjusting for differences between groups (age, sex, duration of diabetes, blood pressure, cholesterol, HbA(1c), smoking, previous hospital admission, treatment with cardiovascular medication), these relative risks were 1.43 (95% CI 1.15-1.77) and 1.70 (95% CI 1.18-2.45), respectively. Patients in the combination cohorts had significantly increased risks of cardiovascular hospital admission, as well as increased risks of mortality and cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSIONS/
INTERPRETATION: In this cohort study of patients newly treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents, those treated with sulfonylureas only, or combinations of sulfonylureas and metformin, were at higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes than those treated with metformin alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16525843     DOI: 10.1007/s00125-006-0176-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


  13 in total

Review 1.  Is metformin cardioprotective?

Authors:  Afshin Sasali; Jack L Leahy
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register. DARTS/MEMO Collaboration.

Authors:  A D Morris; D I Boyle; R MacAlpine; A Emslie-Smith; R T Jung; R W Newton; T M MacDonald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-08-30

3.  Deprivation and health in Scotland.

Authors:  V Carstairs; R Morris
Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)       Date:  1990-07

4.  Some answers, more controversy, from UKPDS. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study.

Authors:  D M Nathan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Increased mortality in Type II diabetic patients using sulphonylurea and metformin in combination: a population-based observational study.

Authors:  J Olsson; G Lindberg; M Gottsäter; K Lindwall; A Sjöstrand; A Tisell; A Melander
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Decreased mortality associated with the use of metformin compared with sulfonylurea monotherapy in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Johnson; Sumit R Majumdar; Scot H Simpson; Ellen L Toth
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Sulphonylurea treatment of NIDDM patients with cardiovascular disease: a mixed blessing?

Authors:  G Leibowitz; E Cerasi
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S M Haffner; S Lehto; T Rönnemaa; K Pyörälä; M Laakso
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  83 in total

1.  Multiple outcomes associated with the use of metformin and sulphonylureas in type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study in Italy.

Authors:  Giovanni Corrao; Silvana Antonietta Romio; Antonella Zambon; Luca Merlino; Emanuele Bosi; Marina Scavini
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Short-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion combined with insulin sensitizers rosiglitazone, metformin, or antioxidant α-lipoic acid in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Zhimin Huang; Xuesi Wan; Juan Liu; Wanping Deng; Ailing Chen; Liehua Liu; Jianbin Liu; Guohong Wei; Hai Li; Donghong Fang; Yanbing Li
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Sulfonylurea use and incident cardiovascular disease among patients with type 2 diabetes: prospective cohort study among women.

Authors:  Yanping Li; Yang Hu; Sylvia H Ley; Swapnil Rajpathak; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Comment on: Evans JM, Ogston SA, Emslie-Smith A, Morris A (2006) risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of patients treated with sulfonylureas and metformin. Diabetologia 49:930-936.

Authors:  J A Johnson; S H Simpson; D T Eurich; S R Majumdar
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Comment on: Evans JMM, Ogston SA, Emslie-Smith A, Morris AD (2006) risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of patients treated with sulfonylureas and metformin. Diabetologia 49:930-936.

Authors:  J A Tayek
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Comment on: Evans JMM, Ogston SA, Emslie-Smith A, Morris AD (2006) Risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of patients treated with sulfonylureas and metformin. Diabetologia 49:930-936.

Authors:  D Raccah
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Effects of metformin plus gliclazide compared with metformin alone on circulating endothelial progenitor cell in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Lu-lu Chen; Yun-fei Liao; Tian-shu Zeng; Fan Yu; Hui-qing Li; Yong Feng
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  A review of cardiovascular risks associated with medications used to treat type-2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Erin L St Onge; Carol Anne Motycka; Shannon A Miller
Journal:  P T       Date:  2009-07

Review 9.  Cardiovascular effects of anti-diabetic medications in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Samar Singh; Jyoti Bhat; Ping H Wang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  New users of metformin are at low risk of incident cancer: a cohort study among people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Gillian Libby; Louise A Donnelly; Peter T Donnan; Dario R Alessi; Andrew D Morris; Josie M M Evans
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.