Literature DB >> 16525681

Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Yosuke Tanaka1, Hironori Maeda, Yasuhiro Ogawa, Akihito Nishioka, Satoshi Itoh, Kei Kubota, Hironobu Ue, Kimiko Nakatani, Shiro Sasaguri.   

Abstract

A sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proved to be an accurate method to estimate the axillary lymph node status as a replacement for axillary lymph node dissection (AxLND) in patients with early breast cancer who have not been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We examined the feasibility and accuracy of performing SNB after NAC. Seventy breast cancer patients treated with NAC were enrolled in the current study during the period between March 2001 and June 2005. NAC performed preoperatively consisted of three to four times of CAF chemotherapy. Moreover, intra-arterial (subclavian artery and internal mammary artery) infusion of epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil was performed in addition to systemic CAF chemotherapy once to three times in patients with large breast tumors or bulky axillary lymph node metastases. The sentinel nodes were successfully identified in 63 out of 70 patients (identification rate: 90%). The mean number of sentinel nodes removed per patient was 1.5 (range 1-6). Of the 43 patients in whom AxLND was performed after the sentinel nodes were identified, 19 (44.2%) had positive sentinel nodes. In 8 of those 19 patients, the sentinel node was the only cancer positive lymph node. Among the 24 patients who had negative sentinel nodes it was found that one patient had a confirmed false negative result, thus yielding a false negative rate of 5%, and a sensitivity of 95%. There was no false negative patient who had a clinically negative lymph node status (N0) before NAC (17 patients), whereas the false negative rate was 6.3% in the subgroup of patients with a clinically positive lymph node status (N1, N2) before NAC (26 patients). As a result, SNB after NAC is thus considered to be able to effectively predict the axillary lymph node status in patients with a clinically negative lymph node status before NAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16525681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1021-335X            Impact factor:   3.906


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a work in progress.

Authors:  Abhishek Chatterjee; Nicholas Serniak; Brian J Czerniecki
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Outcomes of Sentinel Node Biopsy for Women with Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data.

Authors:  Shi-Qian Lin; Nguyen-Phong Vo; Yu-Chun Yen; Ka-Wai Tam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis about head to head comparison of cN0 and cN + patients.

Authors:  Leili Zarifmahmoudi; Atena Aghaee; Giorgio Treglia; Ramin Sadeghi
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 4.  The Feasibility and Accuracy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Initially Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chong Geng; Xiao Chen; Xiaohua Pan; Jiyu Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Assessment of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in two subgroups: Initially node negative and node positive converted to node negative - A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alireza Shirzadi; Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh; Mostafa Qorbani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 1.852

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.