Literature DB >> 16525054

Prefrontal cell activities related to monkeys' success and failure in adapting to rule changes in a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test analog.

Farshad A Mansouri1, Kenji Matsumoto, Keiji Tanaka.   

Abstract

The cognitive flexibility to select appropriate rules in a changing environment is essential for survival and is assumed to depend on the integrity of prefrontal cortex (PFC). To explore the contribution of the dorsolateral PFC to flexible rule-based behavior, we recorded the activity of cells in this region of monkeys performing a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) analog. The monkey had to match a sample to one of three test items by either color or shape. Liquid reward and a discrete visual signal (error signal) were given as feedback to correct and incorrect target selections, respectively. The relevant rule and its frequent changes were not cued, and the monkeys could find it only by interpreting the feedback. In one-third of cells, cellular activity was modulated by the relevant rule, both throughout the trial and between trials. The magnitude of the modulation correlated with the number of errors that the monkeys committed after each rule change in the course of reestablishing high performance. Activity of other cells differed between correct and error trials independently from the rule-related modulation. This difference appeared during actual responses and before the monkeys faced the problems. Many PFC cells responded to the error-signal presentation, and, in some of them, the magnitude of response depended on the relevant rule. These results suggest that the dorsolateral PFC contributes to WCST performance by maintaining the relevant rule across trials, assessing behavioral outcomes, and monitoring the processes that could lead to success and failure in individual trials.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16525054      PMCID: PMC6675148          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5238-05.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence of two different types of error in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

Authors:  F Barceló
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-04-26       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Association of storage and processing functions in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the nonhuman primate.

Authors:  R Levy; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Rule-dependent neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  I M White; S P Wise
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  K A Kiehl; P F Liddle; J B Hopfinger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring.

Authors:  W J Gehring; R T Knight
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control?

Authors:  J D Cohen; M Botvinick; C S Carter
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Neurons in monkey prefrontal cortex that track past or predict future performance.

Authors:  R P Hasegawa; A M Blitz; N L Geller; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Task-specific neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  W F Asaad; G Rainer; E K Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contribution of working memory to transient activation in human inferior prefrontal cortex during performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.

Authors:  S Konishi; M Kawazu; I Uchida; H Kikyo; I Asakura; Y Miyashita
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes.

Authors:  D T Stuss; B Levine; M P Alexander; J Hong; C Palumbo; L Hamer; K J Murphy; D Izukawa
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  69 in total

Review 1.  The orbitofrontal cortex and response selection.

Authors:  James J Young; Matthew L Shapiro
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Does dynamical synchronization among neurons facilitate learning and enhance task performance?

Authors:  David Chik
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  A neural representation of sequential states within an instructed task.

Authors:  Michael Campos; Boris Breznen; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Manipulating neural activity in physiologically classified neurons: triumphs and challenges.

Authors:  Felicity Gore; Edmund C Schwartz; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Abstract Context Representations in Primate Amygdala and Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  A Saez; M Rigotti; S Ostojic; S Fusi; C D Salzman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Simians in the Shape School: A comparative study of executive attention.

Authors:  Kristin French; Michael J Beran; Kimberly Andrews Espy; David A Washburn
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 7.  Emotion, cognition, and mental state representation in amygdala and prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  C Daniel Salzman; Stefano Fusi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Encoding problem-solving strategies in prefrontal cortex: activity during strategic errors.

Authors:  Aldo Genovesio; Satoshi Tsujimoto; Steven P Wise
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Stimulus similarity-contingent neural adaptation can be time and cortical area dependent.

Authors:  Bram-Ernst Verhoef; Greet Kayaert; Edit Franko; Joris Vangeneugden; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Identifying cognitive remediation change through computational modelling--effects on reinforcement learning in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Matteo Cella; Anthony J Bishara; Evelina Medin; Sarah Swan; Clare Reeder; Til Wykes
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.