| Literature DB >> 16524475 |
Suzan Sacar1, Huseyin Turgut, Semra Toprak, Bayram Cirak, Erdal Coskun, Ozlem Yilmaz, Koray Tekin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts are used for intracranial pressure management and temporary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage. Infection of the central nervous system (CNS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with CSF shunts. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical features, pathogens, and outcomes of 22 patients with CSF shunt infections collected over 4 years.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16524475 PMCID: PMC1421408 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-43
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Etiological profile of CNS shunt placement operations of 124 patients
| Etiology of hydrocephalus | No. of Patients (%) |
| Congenital hydrocephalus-myelomeningocele | 18 (14.6) |
| Meningitis- hydrocephalus | 22 (17.8) |
| Intracranial mass | 28 (22.5) |
| Intracranial hemorrhage | 16 (12.9) |
| Trauma | 11 (8.8) |
| Intracranial abscess | 8 (6.5) |
| Other | 21 (16.9) |
| Total | 124 (100) |
Clinical data of the patients
| Age-sex | Etiology of hydrocephalus | Interval between surgery and development of infection | Attack number | Outcome | |
| 1 | 12 month – F | Post meningitic hydrocephalus | 5 day | 2 | Exitus |
| 2 | 14 month – F | Intracranial mass | 4 month | 1 | Good |
| 3 | 4 month – M | Congenital hydrocephalus-myelomeningocele | 16 day | 1 | Good |
| 4 | 2 month – M | Congenital hydrocephalus-myelomeningocele | 3 day | 2 | Exitus |
| 5 | 7 month – M | Congenital hydrocephalus-myelomeningocele | 3 month | 2 | Good |
| 6 | 3 month – F | Congenital hydrocephalus-myelomeningocele | 4 day | 1 | Good |
| 7 | 1 month – F | Congenital hydrocephalus-myelomeningocele | 38 day | 1 | Good |
| 8 | 10 month – F | Congenital hydrocephalus-myelomeningocele | 4 month | 1 | Good |
| 9 | 18 month -M | Congenital hydrocephalus-myelomeningocele | 45 day | 2 | Good |
| 10 | 5 month – M | Post meningitic hydrocephalus | 8 day | 2 | Good |
| 11 | 24 y – M | Trauma | 7 day | 2 | Good |
| 12 | 36 y – F | Trauma | 3 day | 1 | Good |
| 13 | 65 y – M | Intracranial hemorrhage | 12 day | 1 | Good |
| 14 | 56 y – F | Intracranial hemorrhage | 2 month | 1 | Good |
| 15 | 15 y – M | Post meningitic hydrocephalus | 21 day | 1 | Good |
| 16 | 33 y – F | Post meningitic hydrocephalus | 5 day | 1 | Good |
| 17 | 7 y – M | Post meningitic hydrocephalus | 11 day | 1 | Good |
| 18 | 72 y – M | Intracranial abscess | 13 day | 2 | Good |
| 19 | 45 y – M | Intracranial mass | 17 day | 1 | Good |
| 20 | 59 y – M | Intracranial mass | 15 day | 2 | Exitus |
| 21 | 51 y – F | Intracranial mass | 5 month | 1 | Good |
| 22 | 69 y – F | Intracranial mass | 3 month | 1 | Good |
M: Male, F: Female. y: year
Microbiologic profile of CSF shunt infections attacks
| Organism | Incidence (%) |
| 6 (30) | |
| 4 (20) | |
| 3 (15) | |
| 2 (10) | |
| 1 (5) | |
| 1 (5) | |
| 1 (5) | |
| 1 (5) | |
| 1 (5) | |
| Total | 20 (100) |
Previously published microbiologic profile of CSF shunt infectionsa
| Organism | Incidence (%) |
| 32–70 | |
| 12–48 | |
| 6–10 | |
| Enteric Gram- negative bacilli | 6–20 |
| Anaerobes | 6 |
a Pooled data 3,11,15,16