Literature DB >> 16524466

Cognitive dysfunction in NF1 knock-out mice may result from altered vesicular trafficking of APP/DRD3 complex.

Elizabeth A Donarum1, Rebecca F Halperin, Dietrich A Stephan, Vinodh Narayanan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that more than 50% of patients with Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have neurobehavioral impairments which include attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, visual/spatial learning disabilities, and a myriad of other cognitive developmental problems. The biological mechanisms by which NF1 gene mutations lead to such cognitive deficits are not well understood, although excessive Ras signaling and increased GABA mediated inhibition have been implicated. It is proposed that the cognitive deficits in NF1 are the result of dysfunctional cellular trafficking and localization of molecules downstream of the primary gene defect.
RESULTS: To elucidate genes involved in the pathogenic process, gene expression analysis was performed comparing the expression profiles in various brain regions for control and Nf1+/- heterozygous mice. Gene expression analysis was performed for hippocampal samples dissected from postnatal day 10, 15, and 20 mice utilizing the Affymetrix Mouse Genome chip (Murine 430 2.0). Analysis of expression profiles between Nf1+/- and wild-type animals was focused on the hippocampus because of previous studies demonstrating alterations in hippocampal LTP in the Nf1+/- mice, and the region's importance in visual/spatial learning. Network analysis identified links between neurofibromin and kinesin genes, which were down regulated in the Nf1+/- mice at postnatal days 15 and 20.
CONCLUSION: Through this analysis, it is proposed that neurofibromin forms a binding complex with amyloid precursor protein (APP) and through filamin proteins interacts with a dopamine receptor (Drd3). Though the effects of these interactions are not yet known, this information may provide novel ideas about the pathogenesis of cognitive defects in NF1 and may facilitate the development of novel targeted therapeutic interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16524466      PMCID: PMC1434756          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Neurosci        ISSN: 1471-2202            Impact factor:   3.288


Background

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (also known as von Recklinghausen disease) is an autosomal dominant disorder with a prevalence of 1 in 3500, and is characterized by hyperpigmented skin macules (café au lait spots), iris tumors (Lisch nodules), and benign tumors of nerve cells (neurofibromas) [1]. Other physical complications observed in NF1 patients include optic pathway gliomas, scoliosis, macrocephaly, epilepsy, chronic headaches, bending of the long bones (pseudoarthrosis), and sphenoid wing dysplasia [2]. Cognitive deficits in spatial learning and memory also accompany these more physical manifestations of NF1 [3]. Though mental retardation is not commonly seen in NF1 patients, a high proportion of children afflicted with NF1 show learning disabilities (30 – 65%) [3]. These children perform poorly on tasks requiring developed spatial memory and visual-spatial functioning. Though the cognitive manifestations of NF1 have been characterized, no substantial link between the genetic and cognitive deficits has been formed. In addition, no link has been shown between specific mutations within the causative gene and the degree of physical and mental impairment. NF1 is caused by a heterozygous loss of function mutation within the NF1 gene located on chromosome 17q11.2. The NF1 gene encodes a ubiquitously expressed cytoplasmic protein called neurofibromin. The suspected function of neurofibromin is based on sequence homology to known GTPase Activating Proteins (GAPs) as well as through cell biological and functional studies of mutant neurofibromin [4]. Neurofibromin inactivates Ras (Ras-GTP) by converting it to Ras-GDP. Loss of neurofibromin within a cell would thus result in constitutive activation of the Ras signaling pathway, ultimately resulting in cell growth. Ras signaling has also been implicated in neuronal activity and synaptic plasticity [5]. It has been hypothesized that neurofibromin may also act as a modulator of adenylyl cyclase or may facilitate microtubule binding [5]. Studies in drosophila, cultured murine neurons, and Nf1-/- mouse embryos (E12.5) have shown that neurofibromin is necessary for the activation of adenylyl cyclase by pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) [6-9]. Drosophila models deficient for neurofibromin have also been used to determine if the learning deficits seen within mammalian samples are caused by the developmental abnormalities seen in NF1 or if the cognitive defects are due directly to decreased neurofibromin activity. Heat-shock induced neurofibromin was expressed in adult NF1-/- fruit flies, rescuing the learning deficits, indicating that developmental factors are not causing the cognitive deficits [10]. Heat-shock induced cAMP dependent protein kinase (PKA) expression also rescued the learning deficits in adult NF1-/- fruit flies, indicating that the cellular defect must be upstream of PKA within the adenylate cyclase signaling pathway [10]. In this Drosophila model it is hypothesized that neurofibromin acts as a GAP specific to G-proteins, influencing the interaction between G-proteins and adenylate cyclase [10]. The elucidation of auxiliary functions of neurofibromin can be facilitated by further study of such model organisms containing targeted mutations of the Nf1 gene (Drosophila and murine systems). A mouse model of the cognitive deficits associated with Neurofibromatosis type 1 was first developed in 1994 and has since been utilized in the investigation and characterization of the disease [11,12]. The learning deficits seen in the Nf1+/- mice include difficulties in spatial learning and decreased hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) [5]. Increased levels of GABA-mediated inhibition have been linked to these cognitive deficits within the mouse model and introduction of a GABAA receptor antagonist (Picrotoxin) into the knockout mouse system restores normal LTP in the hippocampus [5]. Double knockout mice heterozygous for mutations in both the Nf1 and K-ras genes (Nf1+/-/K-ras+/-) show similar performance on the hidden water maze task as wildtype mice [5]. Inactivating mutations within the K-ras gene decrease the level of functional Ras protein within the cells. Observations that the combination of Nf1 and K-ras mutations in mice results in normal cognitive function support the link between an increase in Ras activity and visual-spatial learning deficits. Ras activity within cells can also be modulated through the introduction of farnesyl-transferase inhibitors. By blocking the post-translational farnesylation of Ras protein in the Nf1+/- mutant mice, performance on visual-spatial tasks are comparable to wildtype mice, rescuing the phenotype [5]. The detailed mechanism by which diminished function of neurofibromin protein leads to defects in hippocampal long term potentiation, and subsequent deficits in cognition and learning is not fully understood. Some of the intermediate steps are dependent on gene transcription and new protein synthesis [13]. It is thus appropriate to study the cumulative effect of Nf1 gene mutation in the developing hippocampus, and characterize alterations in gene expression profiles in this model system. Here we describe the results of our studies comparing gene expression profiles in the hippocampi of Nf1+/- and wild type mice at postnatal ages 10, 15, and 20 days, a time period that is critical for syanptogenesis and synaptic remodeling in the hippocampus. Application of new high-resolution genomic technologies to the Nf1 knock-out mouse model may provide new insight into the mechanisms behind the cognitive impairment in humans with Neurofibromatosis type 1.

Results

Genes showing fold change values of ≥2.0 and corresponding p-values of ≤0.05 were visualized across the time series (post natal days 10, 15, and 20) (Fig. 1). Figure 1 shows the expression profiles of genes across the time series and includes only genes which are significantly changed at a minimum of one time point. Individual lists of genes significantly changed at each individual time point are contained in Tables 1, 2, and 3. Four genes were dysregulated at more than one time point: Ate1, Tcfap2d, Rad51l1, Arhgap8. The lists of dysregulated genes include a myriad of genes including enzymes, receptors, channel molecules, and transcription factors. All raw expression data is publicly available [14,15].
Figure 1

Visualization of all expression fluctuations in the hippocampus across the time series. Visualization of genes in the second dataset showing a significant (p ≤ 0.05) fold change of ≥2 between Nf1+/- and wild type mice at one or more time points (n = 163). Genes showing increased expression in the mutant model appear in the red portion of the expression color spectrum with decreasing genes in the green portion. The normalized intensity is plotted on a log scale versus the postnatal age. Each line represents the expression of an individual gene.

Table 1

Genes at post natal day 10 showing fold change values of ≥2 between Nf1+/- and wild type mice (p ≤ 0.05).

Probe SetUnigeneFold ChangeP ValueGene NameGene Symbol
1421984_atMm.2091112.20.00205stanniocalcin 1Stc1
1422207_atMm.48359.3910.0006245-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 5AHtr5a
1426141_atMm.2070597.5180.0351RF-amide G protein-coupled receptorMrgA1
1445983_atMm.1728356.7070.0139ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2A, RAD6 homologUbe2a
1436615_a_atMm.26116.3960.0416ornithine transcarbamylaseOtc
1457713_atMm.22136.3880.0281excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiencyErcc5
1459730_atMm.522975.6530.0329formin binding protein 1Fnbp1
1446315_atMm.2820395.3760.0362ATP citrate lyaseAcly
1430486_atMm.3417564.8830.0493RAD51-like 1 (S. cerevisiae)Rad51l1
1425443_atMm.2448584.4410.0239transcription factor AP-2, deltaTcfap2d
1452431_s_atMm.2353384.1750.0242histocompatibility 2, class II antigen A, alphaH2-Aa
1433133_atMm.1596713.7080.0269EDAR (ectodysplasin-A receptor)-associated death domainEdaradd
1429566_a_atMm.237903.690.0369homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2Hipk2
1426005_atMm.1990083.6730.00896dentin matrix protein 1Dmp1
1429668_atMm.2465503.670.0389POU domain, class 4, transcription factor 1Pou4f1
1415861_atMm.304383.6510.0382tyrosinase-related protein 1Tyrp1
1427313_atMm.2875723.5570.0125prostaglandin I receptor (IP)Ptgir
1435663_atMm.92133.4490.00753estrogen receptor 1 (alpha)Esr1
1441957_x_atMm.2051963.2110.0202stromal cell derived factor receptor 1Sdfr1
1422038_a_atMm.2613843.190.0384tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 22Tnfrsf22
1421967_atMm.2008863.0310.0318UDP-Gal:betaGlcNAc beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase, polypeptide 5B4galt5
1419085_atMm.414562.9490.0459Purkinje cell protein 2 (L7)Pcp2
1456151_atMm.2990732.9310.0198zinc finger protein 358Zfp358
1449484_atMm.325062.9290.00956stanniocalcin 2Stc2
1436490_x_atMm.2974402.8880.0446RAN, member RAS oncogene familyRan
1447786_atMm.864132.6840.0443pleckstrin homology, Sec7 and coiled-coil domains 1Pscd1
1457684_atMm.2774652.6830.0331heat shock protein 12BHspa12b
1437571_atMm.2616022.5720.023hypermethylated in cancer 2Hic2
1427637_a_atMm.899352.5160.048desmocollin 3Dsc3
1421275_s_atMm.3547612.4380.00644suppressor of cytokine signaling 7Socs7
1444641_atMm.719962.3510.0412adenylate cyclase 3Adcy3
1459828_atMm.19632.3260.00118serine/arginine repetitive matrix 1Srrm1
1421660_atMm.3145312.3230.026sodium channel, voltage-gated, type IX, alpha polypeptideScn9a
1445314_atMm.48662.3020.000693ets variant gene 1Etv1
1421234_atMm.3326072.2480.0373transcription factor 1Tcf1
1442456_atMm.1726792.2150.0262spermatogenesis associated 5Spata5
1441483_atMm.3360812.1530.0398SLIT and NTRK-like family, member 2Slitrk2
1438597_x_atMm.1965082.1370.0365mortality factor 4 like 1Morf4l1
1439428_x_atMm.2471432.1180.0407GDP-mannose 4, 6-dehydrataseGmds
1459924_atMm.3408182.0880.0306ATPase, H+ transporting, lysosomal V0 subunit a isoform 1Atp6v0a1
1425429_s_atMm.3547572.0030.048hypoxia inducible factor 3, alpha subunitHif3a
1427040_atMm.13140.4990.0418kidney cell line derived transcript 1Kdt1
1418745_atMm.1398170.4980.0139osteomodulinOmd
1419230_atMm.3429590.490.00148keratin complex 1, acidic, gene 12Krt1-12
1423170_atMm.2360090.4870.000269TAF7 RNA polymerase II, TATA box binding protein (TBP)-associated factorTaf7
1419231_s_atMm.3429590.4870.00492keratin complex 1, acidic, gene 12Krt1-12
1457306_atMm.69880.4830.0387aminolevulinate, delta-, dehydrataseAlad
1432834_atMm.242420.4750.00679carboxypeptidase B2 (plasma)Cpb2
1449739_atMm.2814640.4720.0126phosphatidylserine synthase 1Ptdss1
1460250_atMm.433750.4660.00542sclerostin domain containing 1Sostdc1
1425291_atMm.49850.4660.00137forkhead box J1Foxj1
1442344_atMm.826800.4650.00971AP1 gamma subunit binding protein 1Ap1gbp1
1456247_x_atMm.185650.4620.0237LIM domain only 6Lmo6
1450760_a_atMm.399990.4620.0157inhibitor of growth family, member 3Ing3
1418082_atMm.102650.4560.0305N-myristoyltransferase 1Nmt1
1427612_atMm.1712240.4440.00697defensin beta 9Defb9
1439051_a_atMm.2605040.4420.0497MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 4Mark4
1421906_atMm.129260.4270.0224peroxisome proliferator activated receptor binding proteinPparbp
1416203_atMm.186250.4270.0261aquaporin 1Aqp1
1444960_atMm.2438550.4120.031cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily u, polypeptide 1Cyp2u1
1424273_atMm.291190.4020.00623cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily c, polypeptide 70Cyp2c70
1450995_atMm.21350.370.0443folate receptor 1 (adult)Folr1
1418554_atMm.28570.3660.0107adrenomedullin receptorAdmr
1424713_atMm.286230.360.0295calmodulin-like 4Calml4
1454866_s_atMm.447470.3570.00964chloride intracellular channel 6Clic6
1449693_atMm.2585890.3530.0446mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7Map3k7
1452546_x_atMm.2210260.3370.0323defensin beta 11Defb11
1419662_atMm.42580.3320.0234osteoglycinOgn
1417297_atMm.3289000.2940.0313inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor 3Itpr3
1436477_x_atMm.2402240.2880.0103RAB2, member RAS oncogene familyRab2
1459738_x_atMm.11140.2860.0425galactosidase, alphaGla
1439167_atMm.2817380.2840.0116peroxisomal trans-2-enoyl-CoA reductasePecr
1420652_atMm.2163210.270.0445arginine-tRNA-protein transferase 1Ate1
1427560_atMm.34100.2590.0328sine oculis-related homeobox 5 homolog (Drosophila)Six5
1435214_atMm.400160.2410.00726gap junction membrane channel protein alpha 12Gja12
1425794_atMm.2099310.2360.0234polymerase (DNA directed), alpha 2Pola2
1426151_a_atMm.2722640.2350.0214syntaxin 3Stx3
1439878_atMm.2073650.2080.0151involucrinIvl
1450805_atMm.3388900.2020.0179sarcoglycan, delta (dystrophin-associated glycoprotein)Sgcd
1438406_atMm.1949500.1950.00559scavenger receptor class F, member 2Scarf2
1439457_x_atMm.98520.1890.0278autophagy 12-like (S. cerevisiae)Apg12l
1444680_atMm.2089700.1710.0137positive cofactor 2, multiprotein complex, glutamine/Q-rich-associated proteinPcqap
1426171_x_atMm.1934780.170.0166killer cell lectin-like receptor, subfamily A, member 7Klra7
1418618_atMm.26570.08286.20E-05engrailed 1En1
Table 2

Genes at post natal day 15 showing fold change values of ≥2 between Nf1+/- and wild type mice (p ≤ 0.05)

Probe SetUnigeneFold ChangeP ValueGene NameGene Symbol
1425754_a_atMm.142012.450.0354butyrophilin, subfamily 1, member A1Btn1a1
1418555_x_atMm.216426.6490.00469Spi-C transcription factor (Spi-1/PU.1 related)Spic
1420992_atMm.102796.5230.00774ankyrin repeat domain 1 (cardiac muscle)Ankrd1
1418358_atMm.3311926.1820.0229mitochondrial capsule selenoproteinMcsp
1458958_atMm.2090416.010.00798neighbor of Punc E11Nope
1447392_s_atMm.2767365.3570.0228carboxypeptidase DCpd
1450439_atMm.2483535.2240.0198host cell factor C1Hcfc1
1435410_atMm.1596084.960.0419testicular cell adhesion molecule 1Tcam1
1454032_atMm.1260794.8310.0386neuropilin (NRP) and tolloid (TLL)-like 2Neto2
1438414_atMm.397034.3370.0381fukutin related proteinFkrp
1420652_atMm.2163214.2450.0175arginine-tRNA-protein transferase 1Ate1
1425069_atMm.2642524.150.00663similar to nuclear protein, 25 K – mouseLOC223706
1421515_atMm.2427283.9980.0161nuclear receptor subfamily 6, group A, member 1Nr6a1
1447362_atMm.291333.9830.04budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog, betaBub1b
1456697_x_atMm.224803.8140.0171cyclin D binding myb-like transcription factor 1Dmtf1
1422260_x_atMm.143023.750.0144chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5Ccr5
1420253_atMm.2013223.6380.0362dolichol-phosphate (beta-D) mannosyltransferase 1Dpm1
1427825_atMm.2722233.5680.0202solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 1b2Slco1b2
1458678_atMm.3479763.3560.00654NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1, alpha/beta subcomplex, 1Ndufab1
1441659_atMm.1513083.3050.0274D4, zinc and double PHD fingers, family 3Dpf3
1417015_atMm.412653.0940.0256Ras association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family 3Rassf3
1418536_atMm.344213.0340.0147histocompatibility 2, Q region locus 7H2-Q7
1437847_x_atMm.282752.9990.0357RNA binding motif protein, X chromosomeRbmx
1440837_atMm.3586042.7710.031histocompatibility 2, O region beta locusH2-Ob
1418595_atMm.129662.7510.041plasma membrane associated protein, S3-12S3-12
1422278_atMm.3278352.7070.00471dopamine receptor 3Drd3
1425398_atMm.3717662.5390.0134histone 1, H2bcHist1h2bc
1425443_atMm.2448582.530.0347transcription factor AP-2, deltaTcfap2d
1419623_atMm.866572.5150.0308protease, serine, 21Prss21
1421359_atMm.571992.510.000164ret proto-oncogeneRet
1450455_s_atMm.899932.5040.00985aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C12Akr1c12
1420710_atMm.48692.4220.0149reticuloendotheliosis oncogeneRel
1434885_atMm.1556872.3570.0457DNA segment, Chr 7, ERATO Doi 413, expressedD7Ertd413e
1451463_atMm.2913722.3510.0344Rho GTPase activating protein 8Arhgap8
1416309_atMm.2900152.2990.00369nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1Nusap1
1425064_atMm.2502652.2720.00144aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocatorArnt
1425721_atMm.2216882.2450.0475pleckstrin homology domain interacting proteinPhip
1421953_atMm.210482.2190.0017v-crk sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene homolog (avian)-likeCrkl
1426520_atMm.1049322.1990.0211B-cell translocation gene 4Btg4
1450104_atMm.30372.1720.0339a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain 10Adam10
1436008_atMm.3715902.1340.00836tumor protein D52Tpd52
1419535_atMm.2637062.1210.0243solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 6b1Slco6b1
1420499_atMm.106512.1210.0318GTP cyclohydrolase 1Gch
1451870_a_atMm.2535182.0110.0256bromodomain containing 4Brd4
1445886_atMm.44540.4970.0367ELK3, member of ETS oncogene familyElk3
1425690_atMm.2187880.4610.0463beta-1,3-glucuronyltransferase 1 (glucuronosyltransferase P)B3gat1
1441966_atMm.1245670.4520.0279transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 3Trpm3
1427635_atMm.303550.4380.0348kinesin family member 5AKif5a
1418194_atMm.2716700.4210.0445UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 10Galnt10
1416239_atMm.32170.420.00011argininosuccinate synthetase 1Ass1
1449266_atMm.1314080.4150.0128methyl CpG binding protein 2Mecp2
1440072_atMm.2107870.4070.021glucocorticoid induced transcript 1Glcci1
1430357_atMm.3715630.3980.0139H3 histone, family 3BH3f3b
1425707_a_atMm.3287200.3870.0192potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 6Kcnj6
1446185_atMm.211580.3530.0479FK506 binding protein 12-rapamycin associated protein 1Frap1
1422144_atMm.35100.3280.0259inhibin beta EInhbe
1421447_atMm.3033550.2980.000377one cut domain, family member 1Onecut1
1449907_atMm.1741330.2550.0278beta-carotene 15, 15'-dioxygenase 1Bcdo1
1421073_a_atMm.185090.2370.0359prostaglandin E receptor 4 (subtype EP4)Ptger4
1420296_atMm.2543700.2320.00578chloride channel 5Clcn5
1418158_atMm.208940.2050.0342transformation related protein 63Trp63
1448074_atMm.50330.1740.0361relaxin 1Rln1
1453630_atMm.2719530.1220.00471UDP-N-acetyl-alpha-D-galactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 14Galnt14
1446162_atMm.1259790.09380.0101poly A binding protein, cytoplasmic 5Pabpc5
Table 3

Genes at post natal day 20 showing fold change values of ≥2 between Nf1+/- and wild type mice (p ≤ 0.05)

Probe SetUnigeneFold ChangeP ValueGene NameGene Symbol
1425947_atMm.24032713.260.000122interferon gammaIfng
1442827_atMm.380494.5680.0446toll-like receptor 4Tlr4
1425478_x_atMm.2400444.3470.0178ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2IUbe2i
1450337_a_atMm.237883.6180.0132NIMA (never in mitosis gene a)-related expressed kinase 8Nek8
1422411_s_atMm.3270883.4780.0376ribonuclease, RNase A family 3Rnase3
1422297_atMm.1582642.7270.0381prefoldin 5Pfdn5
1438564_atMm.2073602.5730.0405growth arrest specific 2Gas2
1433732_x_atMm.2810182.3130.0229insulin-like growth factor 2, binding protein 3Igf2bp3
1427816_atMm.218412.3060.0137splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 2 (SC-35)Sfrs2
1452349_x_atMm.2554142.1490.0043interferon activated gene 205Ifi205
1418604_atMm.43512.0380.0134arginine vasopressin receptor 1AAvpr1a
1438156_x_atMm.185220.4960.0254carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1a, liverCpt1a
1426714_atMm.1316180.4880.00577DNA segment, Chr 11, ERATO Doi 18D11Ertd18e
1455332_x_atMm.3301610.480.00869Fc receptor, IgG, low affinity IIbFcgr2b
1450951_atMm.149100.4780.0373chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 6Cspg6
1423719_atMm.37830.3590.0127cDNA sequence U46068U46068
1419109_atMm.399680.3570.0432histidine rich calcium binding proteinHrc
1460746_atMm.2361140.3560.0339fidgetin-like 1Fignl1
1433382_atMm.791270.3520.0427dynein, axonemal, intermediate chain 1Dnaic1
1449207_a_atMm.2588460.2970.0232kinesin family member 20AKif20a
1455990_atMm.2593740.2790.00332kinesin family member 23Kif23
1436682_atMm.35320.2730.0428thymosin, beta 10Tmsb10
1430486_atMm.3417560.2320.0143RAD51-like 1 (S. cerevisiae)Rad51l1
1426598_atMm.204770.2220.0128ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat gene, Y chromosomeUty
1451463_atMm.2913720.1930.0173Rho GTPase activating protein 8Arhgap8
1441429_atMm.2615910.1880.036insulin receptor substrate 4Irs4
1452563_a_atMm.2626760.1090.00609selected mouse cDNA on the YSmcy
1457582_atMm.204770.07390.0209ubiquitously transcribed tetratricopeptide repeat gene, Y chromosomeUty
1426438_atMm.3029380.05330.0444DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 3, Y-linkedDdx3y
RT-PCR validation was performed on a select group of genes showing significantly (p ≤ 0.05) regulated fold changes of ≥2 fold. As can be seen in Table 4, Affymetrix microarray fold change values correlate well with the trend of transcript levels calculated through RT-PCR reactions. Though the exact fold change values are not identical, the two assays show consistent trends of regulation.
Table 4

Affymetrix and RT-PCR fold change values for genes significantly regulated in the hippocampus of Nf1+/- mice

Gene SymbolGene NameProbe IDFold ChangeP-valueRT-PCR Fold ChangeRT-PCR P-value
Stc1stanniocalcin 11421984_at12.20.00211.75920.0100
Htr5a5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 5A1422207_at9.3910.00062.00050.0580
Neto2neuropilin (NRP) and tolloid (TLL)-like 21454032_at4.8310.03861.40450.0415
Frap1FK506 binding protein12-rapamycin associated protein 11446185_at0.3530.04790.39270.4711
Genes significantly dysregulated at post natal days 10, 15, and 20 were entered into the GeneGo network developing program, along with proteins known to be involved in learning and memory (Tab, ErbB-2, CREB, calcium, AMPA, SH2, ShcC, NMDA receptor, TrkB, MAPK, CaM Kinase II, calcineurin, Rho-associated kinase, MAP2, peripherin, ERK1, ERK2, TARP, PAK3) [16]. A functional network was created identifying genes within the data set that are linked to these known mediators of long term potentiation (LTP). As expected, the GeneGo networking software identified direct modulation of Ras activity (here notated H-Ras) by neurofibromin. The networking program also identified neurofibromin as a physical binding partner with both the kinesin heavy chain and amyloid beta precursor protein (APP) (Fig. 2). While no significant dysregulation of APP was seen in the data set, members of the kinesin motor protein family were downregulated in the Nf1+/- mice at post natal days 15 and 20 (Tables 2 and 3).
Figure 2

Clustering network connecting neurofibromin primary gene mutation with downstream cellular factors. Enlargement of signaling network connecting neurofibromin (Nf-1) with the dopamine 3 receptor (D3DR HUMAN) created through the GeneGo networking software. Neurofibromin is indicated as a binding partner for both the kinesin heavy chain and amyliod beta precursor protein (APP). APP binds through integrins to filamin A, a cytoskeletal organizational protein which in turn can bind to and possibly transport the dopamine 3 receptor.

Gene expression analysis shows a 2.7 fold increase in the expression of dopamine 3 receptor in Nf1+/- brains at post natal day 15. The GeneGo network development software highlights binding properties between this dopamine receptor and filamin A, a protein involved in cytoskeleton organization through binding with integrins, receptors, and second messengers [17]. The associations between integrins and filamin A and between integrins and APP seen in the GeneGo network links neurofibromin to the dopamine receptor. Here it is hypothesized that the APP and integrin proteins are essential for the transport of the dopamine receptor protein down the axon via the filamin proteins. Several other genes linked to intracellular structure and protein trafficking were also dysregulated in the dataset. Aberrant movement of these complexes within the neurons could lead to abnormal localization or abundance of receptors in neuronal processes.

Discussion

Learning and memory deficits observed in human Neurofibromatosis type 1 patients have been modeled in a Nf1 gene knock-out murine system showing well characterized spatial learning and memory deficiencies. These mutant mice exhibit increased levels of activated Ras (Ras-GTP) and increased GABA mediated inhibition. Research has shown that the cognitive deficit in this mouse model can be rescued by inactivating Ras (through genetic modification or pharmacological treatment) or by blocking postsynaptic GABA uptake [5]. We used gene expression profiling to investigate the genetic pathways leading to GABA mediated inhibition, and to link deficiency of neurofibromin to long term changes at the synapse. Differentially regulated genes at postnatal days 10, 15, and 20 were analyzed using GeneGo networking software. This network analysis identified direct interactions between NF1, APP, integrins, filamins, and kinesins. Though compound binding properties were identified in silico, these interactions must be investigated within the cells including how these interactions affect the activity of each protein or the localization of the proteins with the cell. It is known that kinesin proteins act within the nerve cell to carry proteins and cellular organelles from the cell body down neuronal processes [18]. Interaction between neurofibromin and kinesins suggests a mechanism for intracellular localization of the neurofibromin/APP complex. Current literature has identified physical interactions between NF1, APP, and kinesin-1 integral to vesicle transport in melanocytes and neurons. This study proposed that NF1 gene mutations impair vesicle trafficking through aberrant kinesin transport of both NF1 and APP [19]. Through network analysis an interaction between APP and the dopamine 3 receptor (DRD3) was idenified. DRD3, a member of the G alpha inhibitory G protein coupled receptor family, was also dysregulated in the mutant mice, showing a 3 fold increase in expression in the hippocampus. The DRD3 receptor is a member of the D2 like dopamine receptor superfamily which selectively mediates inhibition of adenylate cyclase V [20]. The DRD3 receptor expression has been localized to limbic areas of the brain, where it acts via the Go subunit and adenylate cyclase to decrease cAMP levels [20,21]. It is unknown if alterations in expression of these receptors are involved in either GABA mediated inhibition, or in other pathways leading to the phenotypic leaning and memory deficits characteristic of NF1. The results of our network analysis are shown in Figure 2, implying a functional connection between neurofibromin and the amyloid beta precursor protein/integrin/filamin complex, which is in turn related to the dopamine receptors (Drd3). These potential interactions between neurofibromin and APP or DRD3 might lead to new ideas about how neurofibromin is involved in cellular signaling and synaptic plasticity. Future research should include studies of APP and related signaling pathways as well as dopaminergic systems in NF1 models. This also raises the possibility of investigating these pathways in human patients using modern imaging modalities (such as positron emission tomography).

Methods

Animals (breeding, dissection, genotyping, and sexing)

Nf1+/- mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (symbol Nf1) [22]. Breeder pairs were allowed to mate, and offspring were collected at postnatal days 10, 15, and 20. At these ages, mice were euthanized and bilateral brain regions (hippocampus, cerebral cortex, cerebellum, olfactory bulb, and basal ganglion/thalamus) dissected and immediately flash frozen in an ethanol/dry ice bath. Liver and blood were also collected from each mouse. All tissues were stored at -80°C until RNA or DNA extraction was performed. The Nf1+/- mice contain a Neo targeting cassette, which disrupts the Nf1 gene to form the knockout allele and can be tested using primers specific for this insert. Genotyping was performed through a series of PCR reactions containing one microliter (approximately 100 ng) of sample DNA, 10 pM of primers, 1× PCR buffer, 2.25 mM MgCl2, 10 mM of each dNTP, and 1 unit of Taq Gold polymerase. The PCR cycling program started with 95°C for 5 minutes followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 minute, 55°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 1 minute. The final step was 72°C for 10 minutes followed by a 4°C hold. Genotyping and sexing primers included: Control primers (1.2 kilobase product): mMeC.U256 Forward 5'-GTATGATGACCCCACCTTGC mMeC.L1452 Reverse 5'-TTCAGTCCCTTCCCGCTTTT Neo specific primers (2 kilobase product): Neo5' Forward 5'-GCGTGTTCGAATTCGCCAATG Exon 32 Reverse 5'-GAAGGACAGCATCAGCATG Y Chromosome specific primers (200 base pair product): STS162400 Forward 5'GCAAACAACCTCATAGTCCC STS162400 Reverse 5'CTGGATTTGTGACAAGGAGC The reaction product was visualized by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and the presence of bands noted. The control PCR reaction detected a segment of the MeCP2 gene on the X chromosome, and was used to monitor the integrity of template genomic DNA, and the amplification reaction. The presence of a single 2 kb band in the Neo specific reaction indicated a Nf1+/- heterozygous mouse, whereas wild type genomic DNA was represented by absence of a band. Sex was determined by PCR amplification using the Y-chromosome specific primer set. The presence of a band at 200 bp indicates a male mouse and females are shown as the absence of any product.

Affymetrix expression profiling

Four Nf1+/- mice and four age and sex matched wild type mice were analyzed at each time point. Hippocampi (~20 mg each) from two mice within a single condition were pooled and divided to yield two identical samples, and each was individually extracted, labeled, and hybridized to the Affymetrix (Murine 430 2.0) chip. Total RNA was isolated from each 40 mg tissue sample using Stratagene RTPCR Mini-prep kit (the average yield was 15 μg RNA/40 mg tissue). Extracted RNA was subsequently cleaned using the Qiagen Mini kit protocol, and the purified RNA was analyzed through agarose gel electrophoresis to insure quality. cDNA was synthesis from 7 μg of purified total RNA, in vitro transcription, and hybridization proceeded as previously described [21]. Strict quality controls require that each RNA sample show >4 × amplification through the in vitro transcription protocol, that each scanned array should contain >30% present calls across the array, and that the 3'/5' should show consistent values >3 indicating low nonspecific hybridization. Arrays that do not satisfy these conditions were not included in the analysis and a second sample of cRNA was created utilizing a second allotment of stored total RNA from the sample.

Data analysis

Data was extracted from the array images using Affymetrix Microarray Suite version 5.1 software (MAS5.0). Raw expression data was corrected for saturation at individual probes using an in-house Array Data Manipulation program which replaces S2 values with S1 values if the S2 values are greater than 1500 (baseline normalization of 150) or the S2/S1 signal ratio is less than 0.8. The modified gene expression data for each individual array was imported into GeneSpring v 5.0 (Agilent Technologies). For each time point, average fold changes (relative to wildtype expression data) were calculated with error bars. Genes showing expression changes with significant p-values (p ≤ 0.05) and fold change values of ≥2.0 within at least one time point were exported for functional annotation. Thereafter, the function of each gene was determined through literature searches, genes were binned into ontologic categories, and relevant biological processes and pathways identified.

Modeling the dysfunctional genetic network

The main goal of both temporal and functional clustering is to generate an integrated pathway beginning with the known primary genetic defect and ending with proteins known to be involved in causing the cognitive pathology under study. This pathway then becomes the template for later in vivo validation. The GeneGo network building algorithms (GeneGo, Inc) were used in an iterative fashion to build gene/protein interaction pathways between known NF1 pathway members (NF1, Ras, GABA) and proteins known to be involved in LTP. The gene expression changes with ≥2 fold differences at p ≤ 0.05 were used to seed the algorithms and identified new pathway members which link the primary defect to the cognitive phenotype. All raw expression data is publicly available [14,15].

Validation of the pathogenic cascade

Quantitative Real-Time PCR – Total RNA was extracted from ~20 mg of hippocampus from 3 Nf1+/- and 3 wild type mice using the Absolutely RNA Miniprep Kit (Stratagene). Reverse transcription reactions were done using 3 μg of total RNA from hippocampus, oligo dT primers, and the Super Script III First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Resulting cDNA was amplified on the Chromo4 Four-Color Real-Time System (MJ Research) using the DyNAmo HS SYBR Green qPCR Kit (Finnzymes) and gene specific primers. Standardized and optimized primers were ordered from SuperArray Bioscience Corporation. These included primers designed for Stc1 (stanniocalcin1), Htr5a (5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 5A), Neto2 (neuropilin and tolloid like protein 2), and Frap1 (FK506 binding protein 12-rapamycin associated protein1). The housekeeping gene GAPD (glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was analyzed using the primer set (f-CCAGTATGACTCCACTCACG, r-GAGATGATGACCCGTTTGGC). For amplification, the following program was employed: a 95°C heat activation step for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 10 sec, 55°C for 25 sec, 72°C for 30 sec, incubate at 72°C, and plate reads at both 77°C and 81°C. A melting curve was created evaluating the products between 60–95°C reading every 0.2°C. Primer set specificity was verified through melting curve analysis. The threshold for amplification was set as the number of cycles necessary to reach logarithmic fluorescence accumulation (C(T)). Fold difference in cDNA concentration was calculated using the formula F = 2((MH-MG)-(WH-WG)) where F = fold difference, MH = mutant housekeeping gene (GAPD) C(T), MG = mutant gene of interest C(T), WH = wild type housekeeping gene (GAPD) C(T), WG = wild type gene of interest C(T) [24,25]. Statistical significance of the resulting fold change values was calculated with a two-tailed t-test assuming unequal variance.

Authors' contributions

EAD performed all animal breeding and dissection, as well as network analysis and RT-PCR validation. RH performed all Affymetrix expression profiling. DAS developed experimental design and participated in network and data analysis. VN conceived of the study and assisted in data analysis and interpretation of results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  22 in total

Review 1.  Local protein synthesis and its role in synapse-specific plasticity.

Authors:  K C Martin; M Barad; E R Kandel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  The carboxy-terminal pleckstrin homology domain of ROCK interacts with filamin-A.

Authors:  Kozue Ueda; Yasutaka Ohta; Hiroshi Hosoya
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Identification and validation of P311 as a glioblastoma invasion gene using laser capture microdissection.

Authors:  L Mariani; W S McDonough; D B Hoelzinger; C Beaudry; E Kaczmarek; S W Coons; A Giese; M Moghaddam; R W Seiler; M E Berens
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Detection of gene amplification in archival breast cancer specimens by laser-assisted microdissection and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  U Lehmann; S Glöckner; W Kleeberger; H F von Wasielewski; H Kreipe
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Efficient functional coupling of the human D3 dopamine receptor to G(o) subtype of G proteins in SH-SY5Y cells.

Authors:  P G Zaworski; G L Alberts; J F Pregenzer; W B Im; J L Slightom; G S Gill
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Mechanism for the learning deficits in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Rui M Costa; Nikolai B Federov; Jeff H Kogan; Geoffrey G Murphy; Joel Stern; Masuo Ohno; Raju Kucherlapati; Tyler Jacks; Alcino J Silva
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Neurofibromin regulates G protein-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity.

Authors:  Jiayuan Tong; Frances Hannan; Yinghua Zhu; Andre Bernards; Yi Zhong
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  Learning, memory, and transcription factors.

Authors:  Michael V Johnston; Lily Alemi; Karen H Harum
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.756

9.  Genetic and cellular defects contributing to benign tumor formation in neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  J L Rutkowski; K Wu; D H Gutmann; P J Boyer; E Legius
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-04-12       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  The neurofibromatosis 1 gene product neurofibromin regulates pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-mediated signaling in astrocytes.

Authors:  Biplab Dasgupta; Laura L Dugan; David H Gutmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  9 in total

1.  Selective blockade of dopamine D3 receptors enhances while D2 receptor antagonism impairs social novelty discrimination and novel object recognition in rats: a key role for the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  David J G Watson; Florence Loiseau; Manuela Ingallinesi; Mark J Millan; Charles A Marsden; Kevin C F Fone
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Neurofibromin and amyloid precursor protein expression in dopamine D3 receptor knock-out mice brains.

Authors:  Alessandro Castorina; Gian Marco Leggio; Salvatore Giunta; Gaetano Magro; Giovanni Scapagnini; Filippo Drago; Velia D'Agata
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 3.  The potential role of dopamine D₃ receptor neurotransmission in cognition.

Authors:  Shinichiro Nakajima; Philip Gerretsen; Hiroyoshi Takeuchi; Fernando Caravaggio; Tiffany Chow; Bernard Le Foll; Benoit Mulsant; Bruce Pollock; Ariel Graff-Guerrero
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.600

4.  Hippocampal neurofibromin and amyloid precursor protein expression in dopamine D3 receptor knock-out mice following passive avoidance conditioning.

Authors:  Agata Grazia D'Amico; Alessandro Castorina; Gian Marco Leggio; Filippo Drago; Velia D'Agata
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Multivariate pattern analysis reveals subtle brain anomalies relevant to the cognitive phenotype in neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  João V Duarte; Maria J Ribeiro; Inês R Violante; Gil Cunha; Eduardo Silva; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in phenotypically similar neurogenetic conditions: Turner syndrome and the RASopathies.

Authors:  Tamar Green; Paige E Naylor; William Davies
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.025

7.  Assessing Psychiatric Comorbidity and Pharmacologic Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

Authors:  Alexander C Houpt; Shaina E Schwartz; Robert A Coover
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-07

8.  Gene expression profile of neuronal progenitor cells derived from hESCs: activation of chromosome 11p15.5 and comparison to human dopaminergic neurons.

Authors:  William J Freed; Jia Chen; Cristina M Bäckman; Catherine M Schwartz; Tandis Vazin; Jingli Cai; Charles E Spivak; Carl R Lupica; Mahendra S Rao; Xianmin Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Neurofibromin Structure, Functions and Regulation.

Authors:  Mohammed Bergoug; Michel Doudeau; Fabienne Godin; Christine Mosrin; Béatrice Vallée; Hélène Bénédetti
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.